| Literature DB >> 34202760 |
Kang He1, Juan Zou1, Yu-Xue Wang1, Chen-Liang Zhao1,2, Jiang-Hai Ye1, Jing-Jie Zhang1, Lu-Tai Pan1, Hong-Jie Zhang2.
Abstract
A phytochemical investigation of the leaves of the medicinal plant Isodon rubescens led to the isolation of the two new degraded abietane lactone diterpenoids rubesanolides F (1) and G (2). Their structures were elucidated based on the analyses of the HRESIMS and 1D/2D NMR spectral data, and their absolute configurations were determined by ECD spectrum calculations and X-ray single crystal diffraction methods. Compounds 1 and 2, with a unique γ-lactone subgroup between C-8 and C-20, were found to form a carbonyl carbon at C-13 by removal of the isopropyl group in an abietane diterpene skeleton. Rubesanolide G (2) is a rare case of abietane that possesses a cis-fused configuration between rings B and C. The two isolates were evaluated for their biological activities against two cancer cell lines (A549 and HL60), three fungal strains (Candida alba, Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus nigricans) and three bacterial strains (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis).Entities:
Keywords: ECD calculation; Isodon rubescens; biological activities; norditerpenoids; single-crystal X-ray diffraction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34202760 PMCID: PMC8270274 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133865
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The structures of abietane diterpene and compounds 1 and 2.
1H and 13C-NMR spectral data of 1 and 2.
| No. | 1 a | 2 b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 1a | 1.41 (m) | 26.0 t | 1.21 (brtd, 13.9, 5.0) | 25.2 t |
| 1b | 1.90 (d, 13.1) | 2.11 (m) | ||
| 2a | 1.47 (m) | 19.0 t | 1.58 (m) | 18.0 t |
| 2b | 2.26 (m) | 2.08 (m) | ||
| 3a | 1.15 (brt, 13.4) | 42.1 t | 1.11 (brtd, 13.5, 3.0) | 41.3 t |
| 3b | 1.39 (m) | 1.48 (m) | ||
| 4 | – | 33.9 s | – | 33.8 s |
| 5 | 2.29 (dd, 13.0, 5.6) | 42.0 d | 1.41 (dd, 13.4, 4.7) | 44.4 d |
| 6a | 1.47 (m) | 20.8 t | 1.50 (m) | 19.8 t |
| 6b | 1.75 (dd, 13.7, 4.7) | 1.81 (m) | ||
| 7a | 1.64 (dd, 13.3, 5.2) | 30.9 t | 1.62 (m) | 31.6 t |
| 7b | 2.42 (dd, 13.4, 9.1) | 1.91 (dd, 15.5, 7.2) | ||
| 8 | – | 87.9 s | – | 84.3 s |
| 9 | – | 76.2 s | – | 80.5 s |
| 10 | – | 53.6 s | – | 52.8 s |
| 11a | 2.01 (brtd, 14.6, 2.0) | 32.4 t | 1.86 (d, 5.7) | 24.4 t |
| 11b | 2.20 (d, 14.5) | 2.15 (ddd, 13.7, 11.4, 6.2) | ||
| 12a | 2.34 (dd, 13.8, 2.1) | 37.0 t | 2.44 (dd, 16.6, 6.2) | 36.2 t |
| 12b | 3.00 (m) | 2.75 (m) | ||
| 13 | – | 207.4 s | – | 207.2 s |
| 14a | 2.82 (d, 14.3) | 46.4 t | 2.47 (d, 14.4) | 47.0 t |
| 14b | 2.80 (d, 14.3) | 3.28 (d, 14.4) | ||
| 18 | 0.87 (s) | 32.4 q | 0.89 (s) | 32.2 q |
| 19 | 1.02 (s) | 20.8 q | 0.90 (s) | 20.0 q |
| 20 | – | 179.0 s | – | 179.3 s |
Data (a C5D5N and b CDCl3) were recorded on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz spectrometer. c Multiplicities in parentheses represent: s (singlet), dd (doublet of doublet), td (triplet of doublet) and m (multiplet).
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY (blue and bold) and HMBC (red arrows) correlations of 1.
Figure 3X-ray crystallographic structure of 1.
Figure 4Experimental (black) and calculated ECD (red) spectra of 1.
Figure 5X-ray crystallographic structure of 2.
Figure 6Experimental (black) and calculated ECD (red) spectra of 2.
Scheme 1Proposed biogenetic pathways of 1 and 2.