Zhihua Bai1,2, Ying Cao1,3, Wenjun Liu1,2,4, Jing Li1,2. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China. 2. Savaid Medical School, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. 3. CAS Key Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China. 4. Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Abstract
The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the world is still expanding. Thus, there is an urgent need to better understand this novel virus and find a way to control its spread. Like other coronaviruses, the nucleocapsid (N) protein is one of the most crucial structural components of SARS-CoV-2. This protein shares 90% homology with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus N protein, implying functional significance. Based on the evolutionary conservation of the N protein in coronavirus, we reviewed the currently available knowledge regarding the SARS-CoV-2 N protein in terms of structure, biological functions, and clinical application as a drug target or vaccine candidate.
The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the world is still expanding. Thus, there is an urgent need to better understand this novel virus and find a way to control its spread. Like other coronaviruses, thenucleocapsid (N) protein is one of the most crucial structural components of SARS-CoV-2. This protein shares 90% homology with thesevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirusN protein, implying functional significance. Based on theevolutionary conservation of theN protein in coronavirus, we reviewed the currently available knowledge regarding theSARS-CoV-2N protein in terms of structure, biological functions, and clinical application as a drug target or vaccine candidate.
Coronavirus (CoVs) can cause a variety of diseases in humans and animals, such as infectious gastroenteritis in livestock, infectiousbronchitis in chickens, and thecommon cold with some mild respiratory symptoms in humans [1,2]. However, in the past two decades, novel deadly CoVs haveemerged, causing threeinfectious disease pandemics in human society, resulting in enormous health threats and disrupting the global economy [3]. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first reported in December 2019 and has since spread worldwide, making it the seventh known CoVs to infect humans [4]. The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection is called COVID-19, and is characterized by symptoms, such as shortness of breath or dyspnea, fever, muscle pain, evendeath in severe cases [5]. The cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases already exceeded 200 million worldwide.Molecular evolution analysis based on nucleic acid sequence alignment shows that SARS-CoV-2 is a member of the genus β-Coronavirus and the subgenus Sarbecovirus. The viral genome consists of a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA, which comprises 14 open reading frames (ORFs), encoding 16 nonstructural proteins that make up the replicase complex, nine accessory proteins (ORF), and four structural proteins: spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) [4,6,7]. Among them, theN protein is highly conserved in theCoVs genus and is one of the most abundant structural proteins in virus-infected cells [8]. The fundamental function of theN protein is to package the viral genome RNA into a long helical ribonucleocapsid (RNP) complex and to participate in the assembly of the virion through its interactions with the viral genome and membrane protein M [9]. In addition, theN protein of theCoVs has been shown to be involved in the host cellular machinery such as interferon inhibition, RNA interference, and apoptosis, serving a regulatory role in viral life cycles [10,11]. Moreover, theN protein is also an immunodominant antigen in host immune responses that can be used as a diagnostic antigen and immunogen [12]. As summarized in this article, numerous studies on theN protein of SARS-CoV-2 to investigate the role of theN protein in viral assembly, replication, and the host immune response regulation, to provide a reference for developing specific immune-based drug and vaccine.
2. The Biological Function of the SARS-CoV-2 N Protein
2.1. Composition and Structure of SARS-CoV-2 N Protein
TheN protein of SARS-CoV-2 is encoded by the ninth ORF of the virus and is composed of 419 amino acids. Like other CoVs, theSARS-CoV-2N protein has a modular organization which can be divided into intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and conserved structural regions according to the sequence characteristics [13]. The IDRs include three modules: N-arm, central Ser/Arg-rich flexible linker region (LKR), and C-tail, while the conserved structural regions including two modules: N-terminal domain (NTD) and C-terminal domain (CTD). In the primary structure, NTD and CTD are connected by LKR and are usually flanked by N-arm and C-tail (Figure 1A,B).
Figure 1
Structural overview of the SARS-CoV-2 N protein. (A,B) Schematic of the SARS-CoV-2 N protein modular organization. The three intrinsically disordered regions, including the N-arm, central Ser/Arg(SR)-rich flexible linker region (LKR) and C-tail, and the N-terminal domain (NTD) and C-terminal domain (CTD) are illustrated. (C) Electrostatic surface of the SARS-CoV-2 N-NTD (PDB ID 6YI3) and N-CTD (PDB ID 7CE0). Blue denotes positive charge potential, while red indicates negative charge potential. All structural figures were prepared using PyMOL.
To date, theNTD and CTD of theSARS-CoV-2N protein have been solved and show strongly resembles other CoVsN protein structures [14,15]. For SARS-CoV-2N protein, each NTD molecule presents a right-handed fist shape. The core subdomain consists of a five-stranded U-shaped antiparallel β-sheet with the topology β4–β2–β3–β1–β5, sandwiched between two short α-helices (α1 before β2 strand and α2 after β5). There is a large protruding β-hairpin ((β2′–β3′) between β2 and β3 as a bridge to connect them, which stands out of the core (PDB ID: 6YI3). In terms of the CTD, it exists as a tight homodimer and displays an overall rectangular slab shape, in which each protomer is comprised of five α-helices, two β-strands, and two 310 helices. The β-hairpin from one protomer is inserted into the cavity of the other protomer, resulting in the formation of the four-stranded, antiparallel β-sheet at the dimer interface. The β sheet forms one face of the slab dimer, while on the opposite face of the dimer, the surface is formed by α-helices and loops (PDB ID: 7CE0). Extensivehydrogen bond interactions between the two hairpins and hydrophobic interactions between the β-sheet and the α-helices make the dimeric structure highly stable [14]. However, due to various reasons, such as difficulty in maintaining protein stability and the highly disordered sequence of IDRs, there are no structures available for any of the full-length N proteins from CoVs [16,17]. Some bioinformatics methods may provide some hints. A recent study compared the IDRs of N protein, as well as other CoVs proteins, betweenSARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and bat SARS-likeCoV, which provide important grounds for a better understanding of the biological functions and structure [18]. Meanwhile, the information regarding theN-IDRs by using a combination of 2D spectra and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is worthy of consideration [19].
2.2. Genome Encapsidation: The Primary Function of a Viral N Protein
The fundamental function of theSARS-CoV-2N protein is to package the viral genome into an RNP particle. Thus, theN protein should have the ability to recognize and bind RNA, which numerous studies have proven [17]. Among theSARS-CoV-2N-NTD domain, the protruding β-hairpin (β2′–β3′) is composed mostly of basic amino acid residues. Further analysis of the surfaceelectrostatic potential revealed a positively charged pocket at the junction between the basic hairpin and the core structure which served as a putative RNA binding site (Figure 1C) [15]. By building atomic models of the protein: RNA complex, Dinesh et al. proved that both dsRNA and ssRNA bind in a similar manner to the positively charged canyon located between the basic β-hairpin and the core of theN-NTD where thearginine residues (R92, R107, and R149) that directly bind the RNA are located. Previous studies have proven the presence of another RNA binding domain with a positively charged groove in the helix face of theN-CTD dimer [17,20,21]. For theSARS-CoV-2N-CTD, the positively charged groove consists of K256, K257, K261, and R262 residues (Figure 1C) [14]. In addition, it was reported that both theN-terminal IDR and the LKR have RNA binding activity [22]. While increasing binding affinity, they also enhance the binding allostery, enabling theN protein to bind RNA with high cooperativity [23]. Taken together, this information indicates that theNTD, the CTD, and some disordered regions of N protein can bind RNA cooperatively to promote RNP packaging.Another crucial property of theN protein for genomeencapsidation is its ability to self-associate. TheN-CTD of other β-CoVs was confirmed to self-associate to form an oligomer (dimer, trimer, tetramer, or hexamer, in a concentration-dependent manner) [16,24,25,26]. Similarly, the high-resolution crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2N-CTD shows a compact, strand-swapped dimer in solution [14]. Most important, it was found that the C-terminal domain (residues 365–419) can also self-assemble and further mediateN protein tetramer formation [27]. Studies have also shown that theSer/Arg-rich portion of the LKR domain is highly phosphorylated, which not only affects the nucleocytoplasmic shuttle of theN protein but also regulates the self-association of theN protein [28]. Further experiments have proven that the phosphorylation of LKR reduces the total positive charge of N protein and thereby regulates the oligomerization of theN protein through theelectrostatic effect [29]. Therefore, the assembly of full-length N protein into helical filaments is a complex biological process, which is mediated by cooperative interactions among several interfaces.
2.3. N Protein Undergoes Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation to Enhance Viral Transcription and Assembly
Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a common cellular process to organize biological material into compartments. During the process of virion assembly, it is necessary to format dense protein-nucleic acid compartments that sequester host cell proteins as a means of protection from the host immune system and to locally concentrate viral components to increase theefficiency of replication [30]. Given that it contains both IDRs and RNA-binding domains, theN protein displays the hallmarks of proteins that undergo LLPS [31]. To date, several groups have proved that theN protein of SARS-CoV-2 can phase separately with various RNAs in vitro and its phase behavior is tuned by pH, salt, and RNA concentration [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Meanwhile, it has been revealed that the SR-phosphorylation of N proteins modulate RNA-induced phase separation. The unmodified N protein forms partially ordered gel-like condensates based on multivalent RNA-protein and protein–protein interactions, which facilitates assembly of thenucleocapsid. While the phosphorylated SR region reduces these interactions, generating a more liquid-like compartment for viral genome processing [33]. In addition, a recent observation suggests that viral RNA sequence and structure regulateN protein condensation, depending on their binding patterns. LLPS-promoting sequences are located at 5′ and 3′ ends of the genome, suggestive of a genome packaging role, while other genomic regions promote condensate dissolution, potentially preventing aggregation of the large genome [34].However, although it was clear that theN protein would undergo LLPS and some regulatory elements have been found, how phase separation might relate to a single-genome packaging, although RNA compaction has not been clearly described in detail. So far, some models have been proposed. One model is similar to that proposed in themeasles virus studies [38], in which the process of phase separation is decoupled from genome packaging. In this model, theSARS-CoV-2N protein and genome RNA (gRNA) phase separate in the cytosol. Subsequently, a discrete pre-capsid state forms within condensates, while gRNA condensation occurs through association with a helical nucleocapsid. Upon maturation, the pre-capsid is released from the condensate and undergoes subsequent virion assembly by interacting with themembrane-bound structural proteins (M, E, and S) at theER-to-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC). Another attractive model interpretation is that theN protein has evolved to drive genome compaction for packaging. In this model, a single-genome condensate forms through dynamic multivalent interactions between theN protein and gRNA. During this process, condensate-associated N proteins exchange with solubleN proteins, so the interactions that drive compaction are heterogeneous and dynamic. Subsequently, the single-genome condensate undergoes maturation, leading to virion assembly. Further, the mature condensate then interacts with M protein directly [39]. Both models require moreexperimental data to support their reliability. Of note, it has been demonstrated that LLPS of SARS-CoV-2N protein promotes cooperative association of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase complex with polyU RNA in vitro, which suggests that SARS-CoV-2 uses LLPS-based mechanisms similar to transcription hubs in cellular nuclei to enable high initiation and elongation rates during viral transcription [32,40].
2.4. Regulation of the Host’ Immune Response
The innate immune system functions as the first line of host defense against microbial infections by recognizing and removing infected cells while coordinating adaptive immune responses during viral infection [41]. To replicateeffectively in host cells, viruses haveevolved a variety of antagonistic strategies to circumvent innate immune detection, such as glycosylation to shield essential invasive sites, reduction of thecytosine phosphate guanosine (CpG) levels in the genome, and generation of viral proteins to interfere with anti-viral responses [42]. Together these strategies allow widespread and effectiveinfection. Current studies showed that theN protein also plays a part in this game.In host cells, there is a cell-intrinsic antiviral immune defense mechanism, termed RNAi, which can lead to the destruction of the viral genome to inhibit viral replication [43]. As a countermeasure, viruses encode viral suppressors of RNAi (VSRs) to antagonize the RNAi pathway. In past studies, theSARS-CoVN protein has exhibited a VSR activity in mammalian cells [44]. Intriguingly, cells infected with SARS CoV-2 also exhibited the same phenomenon and SARS CoV-2N protein can antagonize RNAi in multiple steps. In the initiation step, the dsRNA in infected cells could be sequestrated by theN protein, which probably prevents the recognition and cleavage of viral dsRNA by Dicer. In addition, theN protein can suppress siRNA-induced RNAi in cells, implying the antagonistic effect in theeffector step [45]. This suggests that using N protein as the VSR is a common immuneevasion strategy for coronaviruses (Figure 2A). It is well known that infection by various RNA viruses activates theRIG-I-like receptor pathway and initiates theexpression of IFN-β, which is one of the main mechanisms of the host innate immune defense [46,47]. It has been identified that SARS-CoV-2ORF6, ORF8, and N are potent interferon antagonists [48,49]. Further research found that theN protein could inhibit IFN production to varying degrees in different ways. It worth noting that N protein interacted with RIG-I through the Helicase domain, which plays an important role in the binding of immunostimulatory RNAs, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2N protein could suppress the IFN-β response through targeting the cellular RIG-I and RNA recognition, the initial step of IFN activation (Figure 2B) [50]. The other part of the IFN-mediated antiviral pathway is the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, which activates theexpression of a set of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) to establish the host antiviral state. A recent study found that theSARS-CoV-2N protein also exhibited a significant inhibitory effect on this process. Specifically, theN protein interfered with the interactions of STAT1 with JAK1 and STAT2 with TYK2 by competitively binding to STAT1/STAT2 and, in turn, inhibiting their phosphorylation and subsequent nuclear translocation in the293T cells. Furthermore, in theHepG2 cells expressing N protein and infected with SARS-CoV-2, it was found that the phosphorylation of STAT1 and the mRNA levels of ISG15 were reduced and the viral RNA replication was significantly elevated. Taken together, these findings indicated that theN protein could efficiently enhance the replication of SARS-CoV-2 by suppressing the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT1/STAT2, subsequently inhibiting theexpression of ISGs (Figure 2C) [51]. In summary, emerging evidence about theSARS-CoV-2N protein, and comparison with SARS-CoV reveal the many strategies used to evade the innate immune response. These facilitate widespread viral replication and probably lead to exacerbation and hyperinflammation of the innate immune response once triggered.
Figure 2
The host cell’s innate immune processes involving the N protein. (A) N proteins act as viral suppressors of RNA interference (RNAi) in host cells. In the initiation step, the dsRNA in infected cells could be sequestrated by N proteins, which prevent the recognition and cleavage of viral dsRNA by Dicer. In addition, the N protein can suppress siRNA-induced RNA degradation in the effector step. (B) N proteins interact with RIG-I and repress RIG-mediated IFN-β production. N proteins can interact with RIG-I through the helicase domain of DExD/H-box helicases, which has ATPase activity and plays an important role in the binding of immunostimulatory RNAs. Therefore, SARS-CoV-2 N proteins suppress the IFN-β response by targeting the initial step of IFN activation. (C) N proteins antagonize type I IFN signaling by suppressing phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 and 2 (STAT1 and STAT2). The binding of secreted type I IFN to their receptors on neighboring cells can trigger phosphorylation of pre-associated Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2), which in turn phosphorylates the receptors. This leads to the recruitment and phosphorylation of STAT1 and 2. In SARS-CoV-2 infected cells, N proteins can interfere with the interactions of STAT1 with JAK1 and STAT2 with TYK2 by competitively binding to STAT1/STAT2 and in turn inhibit their phosphorylation. Therefore, N proteins further reduce the subsequent nuclear translocation of the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) transcription complex and inhibiting the expression of IFN stimulated genes (ISGs).
3. Clinical Applications of the SARS CoV-2 N Protein
3.1. N-Protein as a Diagnostic Marker
Prompt detection is essential to limit the spread of pathogens. The availability of the complete genomic sequence of SARS CoV-2 has facilitated the development of a variety of diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been used as a rapid diagnostic test during theepidemic [52]. However, the sensitivity of viral RNA testing varies depending on the timing of testing relative to exposure, which could lead to false-negative results [53]. Thus, more and more laboratories pay attention to serological tests.Among the four CoVs structural proteins, the S and N proteins are the main immunogens [54]. There have been several serological tests showing that S and N induced a strong antibody response in hosts [55,56]. During the detection process, it was found that the detection rate of N protein was higher than that of S protein in PCR-positivepatients [57]. Hence, it is a feasible method to useN proteins for serological tests or combined N and S proteins as capture antigens to increase the sensitivity of this assay. However, one question raised is that the test for specific antibodies against SARS-COV-2 in theserum will appear positive only about 7 days after infection or later, making it difficult to detect theinfection at an early stage. Given this situation, it is necessary to explore the diagnostic value of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in theearly stages of SARS-COV-2 infection. Several studies have detected serum N protein level in SARS-COV-2 infectedpatients and analyzed the correlation with serum N protein antibody level using the commercial kit. Based on the CUT-OFF value determined from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the specificity of theSARS-COV-2serum N protein detection was 96.84%, and the sensitivity was 92% before the appearance of antibodies, suggesting that the detection of SARS-COV-2serum N protein has a high diagnostic value for infectedpatients before the appearance of antibodies, and shortens the window of serological diagnosis [58]. Meanwhile, several laboratories have tried to identify the immunodominant epitopes of N protein and develop specific monoclonal antibodies that can be used in ELISA. Amrun et al. identified four immunodominant epitopes: S14P5, S20P2, S21P2, and N4P5, on the S and N viral proteins. IgG responses to all identified epitopes displayed a strong detection profile, with N4P5 achieving the highest level of specificity (100%) and sensitivity (>96%) against SARS-CoV-2, suggesting the feasibility of developing mAbs to theseepitopes alone or in combination used in ELISA to detect SARS-CoV-2 [59].Taken together, all these data support the notion that theN-protein could be used as an efficient diagnostic tool for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the specific detection methods of N protein should further be validated in morepatient samples.
3.2. N Protein: As a Therapeutic Target
Despiteextensive research on COVID-19, there is currently no effective treatment available for clinical use. Based on the conservation of CoVsN protein in evolution and its key role in viral replication, it is a promising target for drug discovery. Firstly, since the RNA binding activity of N protein is pivotal to viral RNP formation and genome replication, blocking the RNA binding of N-NTD has been proven to be a considering strategy. To date, there have been some small compounds targeting other CoVs considered as candidate inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 by virtual screening. For example, the compounds PJ34 and H3, which targeted the RNA binding site of N-NTD, can inhibit HCoV-OC43 replication [14]. Notably, the key residues that are involved in the RNA binding interactions, including S51, F53, R107, Y109, Y111, and R149 (in SARS-CoV-2N-NTD numbering), are conserved, suggesting potential development possibility (Figure 3) [60,61].
Figure 3
Sequences alignment of four CoVs N-NTD. Multiple sequence alignment of HCoV-OC43 (UniProtKB: P33469), SARS-CoV-2 (UniProtKB: P0DTC9), SARS-CoV (UniProtKB: P59595), MERS-CoV (UniProtKB: K9N4V7). The highly conserved residues were filled with colors. Red arrows indicate conserved RNA binding sites. Blue arrows and green arrow indicate conserved and mutant residues for the non-native interaction interface, respectively. HCoV-OC43, human coronavirus OC43; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SARS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. (The fill color selected in this figure legend is the default setting of the BioEdit software.).
In addition, blocking normal N protein oligomerization or triggering abnormal RNP formation is also an attractive inhibitory strategy. More recently, Lin et al. identified 5-benzyloxygramine (P3) is a novel inhibitor for MERS-CoV by virtual screening. This compound could mediateMERS-CoVN-NTD non-native dimerization and induceN protein aggregation. The structure-based study showed that P3 targets the non-native interface of N-NTD dimers and simultaneously interacts with the hydrophobic pockets in both N-NTD protomers. It was demonstrated that P3 was able to replace the vector-fusion residues of promoter 2 to occupy its binding cavity in promoter 1 under the legend free condition, which, in turn, stabilized the dimeric status by triggering massive hydrophobic interactions [14,62]. By comparing the binding sites of P3 in the hydrophobic cavity, it was found that almost all of the residues of theN-NTD involved in the interactions are conserved, except F135 in MERS-CoV, which is replaced by I146 in SARS-CoV-2(Figure 3). Although both residues are nonpolar amino acids, theeffect on SARS-CoV-2 replication needs to be further verified. For other viruses, such as thehuman immunodeficiency virus and influenza virus, the researchers proposed a strategy to inhibit viral N protein oligomerization by developing competing peptides [63,64]. For CoVs, it has been shown that theexcessive peptide based on the C-terminal tail sequence can interfere with CTD oligomerization of HCoV-229EN protein and decrease the viral titer, providing a reference for relevant studies on SARS COV-2N protein [65]. Notably, the LLPS of N protein induced by viral genomic RNA is also a potential target [35]. Slowing viral infection by increasing or decreasing theN protein LLPS is a strategy that could be considered. 1,6-hexanediol, lipoic acid, and aminoglycosidekanamycin, each of which potentially alters LLPS by a representative and distinct mechanism. In terms of SARS-CoV-2, further experiments showed that the formation or the size of condensates could be reduced after treatment with these small molecules [34]. Meanwhile, high-throughput virtual screening is underway, several potential drug candidates have been proposed, and thenext focus is on rigorous experimental validation, such as (−)-catechin gallate and (−)-gallocatechin gallate [66] (Table 1).
Considerable insights regarding the structure and function of the β-CoVsN protein were revealed in the last decades due to theemergence of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Remarkably, theSARS-CoV-2N protein shares a common modular structure organization including theNTD, CTD, and IDRs with other CoVs. Existing studies have shown that theSARS-CoV-2N protein is a multifunctional RNA-binding protein, which is not only responsible for packaging viral genomes but also regulates the innate immune response caused by viral infection. However, the quest for understanding how theSARS-CoV-2N protein, as well as CoVsN proteins in general, forms the RNP and carries out its roles during the viral life cycle is still far from over. Hence, moreeffort will be required to clarify its role. In addition, compared with other structure proteins, the conserved nature of theN protein in theevolutionary process cannot be ignored, and it is therefore considered an important diagnostic marker and drug target. Recently, inhibition strategies targeting theSARS-CoV-2N protein have been proposed, such as blocking the binding between theN protein and viral genome or inducing abnormal oligomerization of theN protein to inhibit the correct assembly of RNP, thus affecting progeny viral replication. Meanwhile, experimental validation of drug candidates from high-throughput virtual screening is also progressing.Unfortunately, theepidemic of SARS-CoV-2 is still ongoing and is likely to become a common pathogen, which makes combating this disease a constant challenge [70]. Therefore, in the long-term, a vaccine to prevent infection is crucial. To date, several COVID-19 vaccines have been approved for the market, all of which were selected from the S protein or the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S protein as the leading immunogen, based on the critical role of the S protein in the process of virus invasion [71,72]. However, some problems cannot be ignored; primarily the nonsynonymous mutations, which have developed in the S protein as theSARS-CoV-2epidemic progressed [73,74], which may jeopardize previous vaccine countermeasures. Given this concern, Chenet al. obtained or generated a panel of authentic infectiousSARS-CoV-2 strains with sequence variations in thespike gene, including a B.1.1.7 isolate, chimeric Washington strains with a South African (Wash SA-B.1.351), or Brazilian (Wash BR-B.1.1.248) spike gene and isogenic recombinant variants, with designed mutations or deletions at positions 69–70, 417, 484, 501, 614 and/or 681 of the S protein, subsequently using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), animal immunesera, human convalescent sera, and humansera from recipients of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine to evaluate theeffects of SARS-CoV-2 strain variation on antibody neutralization. Many highly neutralizing mAbs, most convalescent sera, and mRNA vaccine-induced immunesera reduced the inhibitory activity against viruses containing an E484Kspike mutation [75]. Hence, adjusting the gene sequence of thespike antigen to prevent the vaccine from losing protective ability in vivo may need to be considered.Meanwhile, more attention should be paid to the more conservativeN protein. TheN protein of CoVs was highly immunogenic and is expressed abundantly during infection [76]. High levels of IgG antibodies against theN protein have been detected in sera from SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2patients [55,56,77], and theN protein is a representative antigen for the T-cell response in a vaccine setting, inducing SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell proliferation and cytotoxic activity [78,79,80]. Immune monitoring of patients recovering from SARS-CoV infection showed SARS-CoV-specific antibodies dropped below the limit of detection within 2 to 3 years [81], whereas the specific memory T cells have been detected even 11 years later [82]. Thus, more importantly, the induction of long-term T cell immune memory must be considered in vaccine design. It is exciting to discover that SARS-CoV recovered patients possess long-lasting memory T cells that are reactive to theN protein of SARS-CoV 17 years after the outbreak of SARS in 2003, and these T cells displayed robust cross-reactivity to theN protein of SARS-CoV-2 [83]. Given the prior exposure to other human coronaviruses may confer some protection, Oliveira et al. predicted major T cell epitopes of theSARS-CoV-2N protein and compared with the other CoVs that infect humans to find conserved motifs [84]. Notably, it has been found that a potential T cell cross-reactivity region within theSARS-CoV-2N protein position 102–110 amino acids that traverse multiplehumanCoVsexists. Vaccination strategies designed to target these conserved peptides may elicit cross-reacting T cell responses among different CoVs. In addition, a DNA-based vaccine platform examined the safety and immunogenicity of theSARS-CoV-2N gene as an antigen and found that theN protein plasmid could induce anti-N titers of 104 to 105 after a boost in New Zealand Whiterabbits. Further, when C57BL/6 mice were immunized with N protein in adjuvant or 50 μg of DNA, specific T cell responses could also be detected [85]. These reports offer important and timely insights relevant to theSARS-CoV-2N protein as a vaccine target. Compared with other potential SARS-CoV-2 antigens, theN antigen has some distinct advantages, including the conservation of theN protein sequence, theexpanding knowledge of its genetics and biochemistry, and its strong immunogenicity. Hence, considering theN antigen as a vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2 and/or including N antigen in spike-related vaccine design, adds the benefits of increasing immunogenicity and ensures a more future-proof vaccine strategy. Regardless of the considerable areas remaining to beexplored about theN protein of SARS-CoV-2, more work is needed to improve our understanding of the biology of SARS-CoV-2 and may contribute to the design of better prevention tools.
Authors: Nina Le Bert; Anthony T Tan; Kamini Kunasegaran; Christine Y L Tham; Morteza Hafezi; Adeline Chia; Melissa Hui Yen Chng; Meiyin Lin; Nicole Tan; Martin Linster; Wan Ni Chia; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Lin-Fa Wang; Eng Eong Ooi; Shirin Kalimuddin; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah; Jenny Guek-Hong Low; Yee-Joo Tan; Antonio Bertoletti Journal: Nature Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Siti Naqiah Amrun; Cheryl Yi-Pin Lee; Bernett Lee; Siew-Wai Fong; Barnaby Edward Young; Rhonda Sin-Ling Chee; Nicholas Kim-Wah Yeo; Anthony Torres-Ruesta; Guillaume Carissimo; Chek Meng Poh; Zi Wei Chang; Matthew Zirui Tay; Yi-Hao Chan; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Jenny Guek-Hong Low; Paul A Tambyah; Shirin Kalimuddin; Surinder Pada; Seow-Yen Tan; Louisa Jin Sun; Yee-Sin Leo; David C Lye; Laurent Renia; Lisa F P Ng Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Yi Jun Ruan; Chia Lin Wei; Ai Ling Ee; Vinsensius B Vega; Herve Thoreau; Se Thoe Yun Su; Jer-Ming Chia; Patrick Ng; Kuo Ping Chiu; Landri Lim; Tao Zhang; Chan Kwai Peng; Ean Oon Lynette Lin; Ng Mah Lee; Sin Leo Yee; Lisa F P Ng; Ren Ee Chee; Lawrence W Stanton; Philip M Long; Edison T Liu Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-05-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: George Krashias; Elie Deeba; Astero Constantinou; Maria Hadjiagapiou; Dana Koptides; Jan Richter; Christina Tryfonos; Stavros Bashiardes; Anastasia Lambrianides; Maria A Loizidou; Andreas Hadjisavvas; Mihalis I Panayiotidis; Christina Christodoulou Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-12-31