Literature DB >> 15755609

The development of vaccines against SARS corona virus in mice and SCID-PBL/hu mice.

Masaji Okada1, Yuji Takemoto, Yoshinobu Okuno, Satomi Hashimoto, Shigeto Yoshida, Yukari Fukunaga, Takao Tanaka, Yoko Kita, Sachiko Kuwayama, Yumiko Muraki, Noriko Kanamaru, Hiroko Takai, Chika Okada, Yayoi Sakaguchi, Izumi Furukawa, Kyoko Yamada, Makoto Matsumoto, Tetsuo Kase, Daphne E Demello, J S M Peiris, Pei-Jer Chen, Naoki Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki Yoshinaka, Tatsuji Nomura, Isao Ishida, Shigeru Morikawa, Masato Tashiro, Mitsunori Sakatani.   

Abstract

We have investigated to develop novel vaccines against SARS CoV using cDNA constructs encoding the structural antigen; spike protein (S), membrane protein (M), envelope protein (E), or nucleocapsid (N) protein, derived from SARS CoV. Mice vaccinated with SARS-N or -M DNA using pcDNA 3.1(+) plasmid vector showed T cell immune responses (CTL induction and proliferation) against N or M protein, respectively. CTL responses were also detected to SARS DNA-transfected type II alveolar epithelial cells (T7 cell clone), which are thought to be initial target cells for SARS virus infection in human. To determine whether these DNA vaccines could induce T cell immune responses in humans as well as in mice, SCID-PBL/hu mice was immunized with these DNA vaccines. As expected, virus-specific CTL responses and T cell proliferation were induced from human T cells. SARS-N and SARS-M DNA vaccines and SCID-PBL/hu mouse model will be important in the development of protective vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15755609      PMCID: PMC7115605          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


Introduction

The causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been identified as a new type of corona virus, SARS corona virus (SARS CoV) [1], [2], [3]. SARS has infected more than 8400 patients in about 7 months in over 30 countries and caused more than 800 deaths. The deadly epidemic has had significant impacts on many health, social, economic and political aspects. SARS is assumed to resurge in the near future. However, no SARS vaccine is currently available for clinical use. Therefore, we have developed novel vaccine candidates against SARS CoV using cDNA constructs encoding the structural antigens; S, M, E, or N protein. In immunized mice, neutralizing antibodies against the virus and T cell immunity against virus-infected-cells were studied, since these immunities play important roles in protection against many virus infections. In particular, CD8+ CTL plays an important role in T cell immunity dependent protection against virus infections and the eradication of murine and human cancers [4], [5]. In the present study, a type II alveolar epithelial cell clone, T7, was used for analyzing precise mechanism of CTL against SARS CoV membrane antigens, as the SARS-CoV infects alveolar epithelial cell in the lungs [6]. Furthermore, the SCID-PBL/hu model, which is capable of analyzing in vivo human immune response, was also used because it is a more relevant translational model for human cases [4].

Materials and methods

Three kinds of SARS CoV strains: HKU39849(1), TW-1 and FFM-1(2) and their cDNAs were used. S, M, N or E cDNA was transferred into pcDNA 3.1(+) vector and pcDNA 3.1(+)/vs-His Topo (QIAGEN K K, Tokyo, Japan). These genes were expressed in eukaryotic cells and Escherichia coli. pcDNA 3.1(+) vector, 50 μg each, containing SARS S, M, N, or E DNA was injected i.m. (M.tibia anterior) into C57BL/6 mice (female, 8 weeks CLEA Japan Inc, Japan) and BALB/c mice (female, 8 weeks) three times, at an interval of 7 days. Neutralizing antibodies against SARS CoV in the serum from the mice immunized with SARS S, M, N or -E DNA vaccines were assayed by use of Vero-E6 cell. CTL activity against SARS CoV was studied using human type II alveolar epithelial cells, T7, expressing SARS antigens [6]. PBL from healthy human volunteers were administered i.p. into IL-2 receptor γ-chain disrupted NOD SCID mice [IL-2R(−/−) NOD-SCID], and SCID-PBL/hu mice were constructed [4]. SARS DNA vaccines at 50 μg were injected i.m. into the SCID-PBL/hu mice. CTL activity of human CD8-positive lymphocytes in the spleen from SCID-PBL/hu was assessed using IFN-γ production and 51Cr-release assay [4], [5].

Results

Induction of CTL against SARS CoV by SARS (N) DNA and SARS (M) DNA vaccine

Spleen cells from C57BL/6 mice immunized with SARS-S, -M, -N or -E DNA vaccine were cultured with syngeneic T7 lung cells transfected with S, M, N or E cDNA. pcDNA 3.1(+) SARS (N) DNA vaccine induced significantly CTL activity (IFN-γ production) against N cDNA transfected T7 cells (Fig. 1A). Similarly, SARS M DNA vaccine induced SARS antigen M-specific CTL against T7 cells transfected with SARS M DNA (data not shown).
Fig. 1

Induction of CTL and T cell proliferation against SARS (N). (A) Induction of CTL against SARS (N) antigen in the spleen cells from C57BL/6 mice immunized with SARS (N) DNA vaccine. SARS (N) DNA using pcDNA3.1(+) vector was injected i.m. into C57BL/6 mice three times, at an interval of 7 days. CTL activity was assessed by IFN-γ production in the culture of 1 × 106 spleen cells and 1 × 104 T7 lung alveolar type II epithelial cells transfected with SARS (N) DNA at the E/T ratio of 100:1. IFN-γ production was assessed by ELISA assay. (B) Augmentation of lymphocyte proliferation specific for SARS (N) DNA vaccine. 1 × 105 responder cells from vaccinated mice were cultured with Mitomycin C treated 1 × 104 T7 cells transfected with SARS (N) DNA for 48 h and then Bromodeoxy Uridine (BrdU) was added. Proliferative responses were assessed by BrdU assay.

Induction of CTL and T cell proliferation against SARS (N). (A) Induction of CTL against SARS (N) antigen in the spleen cells from C57BL/6 mice immunized with SARS (N) DNA vaccine. SARS (N) DNA using pcDNA3.1(+) vector was injected i.m. into C57BL/6 mice three times, at an interval of 7 days. CTL activity was assessed by IFN-γ production in the culture of 1 × 106 spleen cells and 1 × 104 T7 lung alveolar type II epithelial cells transfected with SARS (N) DNA at the E/T ratio of 100:1. IFN-γ production was assessed by ELISA assay. (B) Augmentation of lymphocyte proliferation specific for SARS (N) DNA vaccine. 1 × 105 responder cells from vaccinated mice were cultured with Mitomycin C treated 1 × 104 T7 cells transfected with SARS (N) DNA for 48 h and then Bromodeoxy Uridine (BrdU) was added. Proliferative responses were assessed by BrdU assay.

Augmentation of lymphocyte proliferation specific for SARS CoV antigens by the immunization with SARS (M) DNA and SARS (N) DNA vaccine

The proliferation of splenic T cells stimulated by co-culture either with T7 cells transfected with M DNA or SARS M peptide (TW1 M102-116) was strongly augmented by M DNA vaccine (data not shown). SARS N DNA vaccine also induced proliferation of splenic T cells in the presence of recombinant N protein as well as N DNA-transfected T7 cells (Fig. 1B). Thus, both SARS N DNA vaccine and M DNA vaccine were shown to induce T cell immune responses against the relevant SARS CoV antigens.

SARS M DNA and N DNA vaccines induced human T cell immune responses (CTL and proliferation) in SCID-PBL/hu model

The M DNA vaccine enhanced the CTL activity and proliferation in the presence of M peptide in SCID-PBL/hu mice (Fig. 2 ). Furthermore, the SARS N DNA vaccine induced CTL activity (IFN-γ production by recombinant N protein or N protein pulsed-autologous B blast cells) and proliferation of spleen cells in SCID-PBL/hu mice (Fig. 3 ). From these results, it was demonstrated that SARS M DNA vaccine and N DNA vaccine induced human CTL and human T cell proliferative responses.
Fig. 2

SARS (M) DNA vaccine induces in vivo human T cell proliferation against SARS CoV in the SCID-PBL/hu human immune systems. 4 × 107 PBL from healthy human volunteers were administered i.p. into IL-2 receptor γ-chain disrupted NOD SCID mice [IL-2R (−/−) NOD-SCID], and SCID-PBL/hu mice were constructed. Fifty micrograms of SARS DNA vaccine was injected i.m. into these SCID-PBL/hu mice. 1 × 105 spleen cells from these vaccinated mice were cultured with 10∼50 μg of SARS M peptide for 3 days. Proliferation was assayed by BrdU.

Fig. 3

SARS (N) DNA vaccine induces in vivo human CTL against SARS CoV in the SCID-PBL/hu human immune systems. 4 × 107 PBL from healthy human volunteers were administered i.p. into IL-2 receptor γ-chain disrupted NOD SCID mice [IL-2R (−/−) NOD-SCID], and SCID-PBL/hu mice were constructed 50 μg of SARS (N) DNA vaccine or 50 μg of SARS (S) DNA vaccine. 1 × 105 spleen cells from SCID-PBL/hu were cultured with 10 μg of recombinant SARS (N) protein for 72 h. IFN-γ production in the culture supernatant was assayed using ELISA.

SARS (M) DNA vaccine induces in vivo human T cell proliferation against SARS CoV in the SCID-PBL/hu human immune systems. 4 × 107 PBL from healthy human volunteers were administered i.p. into IL-2 receptor γ-chain disrupted NOD SCID mice [IL-2R (−/−) NOD-SCID], and SCID-PBL/hu mice were constructed. Fifty micrograms of SARS DNA vaccine was injected i.m. into these SCID-PBL/hu mice. 1 × 105 spleen cells from these vaccinated mice were cultured with 10∼50 μg of SARS M peptide for 3 days. Proliferation was assayed by BrdU. SARS (N) DNA vaccine induces in vivo human CTL against SARS CoV in the SCID-PBL/hu human immune systems. 4 × 107 PBL from healthy human volunteers were administered i.p. into IL-2 receptor γ-chain disrupted NOD SCID mice [IL-2R (−/−) NOD-SCID], and SCID-PBL/hu mice were constructed 50 μg of SARS (N) DNA vaccine or 50 μg of SARS (S) DNA vaccine. 1 × 105 spleen cells from SCID-PBL/hu were cultured with 10 μg of recombinant SARS (N) protein for 72 h. IFN-γ production in the culture supernatant was assayed using ELISA.

Discussion

We have demonstrated that SARS (M) DNA and (N) DNA vaccines induce virus-specific immune responses (CTL and T cell proliferation) in the mouse systems using type II lung alveolar T cell lines in clone target models [6]. These DNA vaccines induced SARS-CoV-specific CTL and T cell proliferation in vivo human immune systems using SCID-PBL/hu. Gao et al. developed adenovirus based a SARS DNA vaccine encoding S1 polypeptide was capable of inducing neutralizing antibody, while another SARS DNA vaccine encoding N protein generated IFN-γ producing T cells in rhesus monkeys [7]. SARS S DNA vaccine which elicits effective neutralizing antibody responses that generate protective immunity in a mouse model [8]. However its immunogenicity in humans has yet to be established. Therefore, it is very important to evaluate the efficacy of SARS DNA vaccine in a SCID-PBL/hu mice, which is a highly relevant translational model for demonstrating human immune responsiveness. Recently, SARS DNA vaccines capable of inducing human neutralizing antibodies against SARS CoV have been established by our SCID-PBL/hu model. It has been demonstrated that Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a functional receptor for the SARS CoV [9]. A transgenic mouse with human ACE-2 may be useful as an animal model of SARS. Furthermore, ACE-2 transgenic SCID mice should be useful as a human model for pre-clinical trial for SARS vaccines, since ACE-transgenic SCID-PBL/hu model could analyze the human immune responses against SARS infection in vivo. The effect of combination immunization with such SARS vaccines and neutralizing antibody dependent DNA vaccine is now being studied. These DNA vaccines should provide a useful tool for development of protective vaccines.
  9 in total

Review 1.  The severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph S M Peiris; Kwok Y Yuen; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Klaus Stöhr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The anti-human tumor effect and generation of human cytotoxic T cells in SCID mice given human peripheral blood lymphocytes by the in vivo transfer of the Interleukin-6 gene using adenovirus vector.

Authors:  F Tanaka; M Abe; T Akiyoshi; T Nomura; K Sugimachi; T Kishimoto; T Suzuki; M Okada
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Establishment and characterization of human T hybrid cells secreting immunoregulatory molecules.

Authors:  M Okada; N Yoshimura; T Kaieda; Y Yamamura; T Kishimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  J S M Peiris; S T Lai; L L M Poon; Y Guan; L Y C Yam; W Lim; J Nicholls; W K S Yee; W W Yan; M T Cheung; V C C Cheng; K H Chan; D N C Tsang; R W H Yung; T K Ng; K Y Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Generation of an immortal differentiated lung type-II epithelial cell line from the adult H-2K(b)tsA58 transgenic mouse.

Authors:  D E deMello; S Mahmoud; P J Padfield; J W Hoffmann
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Yang; Wing-Pui Kong; Yue Huang; Anjeanette Roberts; Brian R Murphy; Kanta Subbarao; Gary J Nabel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Effects of a SARS-associated coronavirus vaccine in monkeys.

Authors:  Wentao Gao; Azaibi Tamin; Adam Soloff; Leonardo D'Aiuto; Edward Nwanegbo; Paul D Robbins; William J Bellini; Simon Barratt-Boyes; Andrea Gambotto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus.

Authors:  Wenhui Li; Michael J Moore; Natalya Vasilieva; Jianhua Sui; Swee Kee Wong; Michael A Berne; Mohan Somasundaran; John L Sullivan; Katherine Luzuriaga; Thomas C Greenough; Hyeryun Choe; Michael Farzan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  25 in total

Review 1.  Mice with human immune system components as in vivo models for infections with human pathogens.

Authors:  Patrick C Rämer; Obinna Chijioke; Sonja Meixlsperger; Carol S Leung; Christian Münz
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.126

2.  Comparative study of synonymous codon usage variations between the nucleocapsid and spike genes of coronavirus, and C-type lectin domain genes of human and mouse.

Authors:  Insung Ahn; Byeong-Jin Jeong; Hyeon Seok Son
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 8.718

Review 3.  The SARS-Coronavirus Infection Cycle: A Survey of Viral Membrane Proteins, Their Functional Interactions and Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Nicholas A Wong; Milton H Saier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 is a potential target for developing new generation of vaccine.

Authors:  Weixu Feng; Yunru Xiang; Lianpeng Wu; Zhuo Chen; Qingfeng Li; Jun Chen; Yanru Guo; Dandan Xia; Na Chen; Lifang Zhang; Shanli Zhu; Kong-Nan Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.124

Review 5.  SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and assessment of coronaviruses in CNS diseases with a focus on therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Jayalakshmi Vallamkondu; Albin John; Willayat Yousuf Wani; Suguru Pathinti Ramadevi; Kishore Kumar Jella; P Hemachandra Reddy; Ramesh Kandimalla
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.187

Review 6.  Viewing SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein in Terms of Molecular Flexibility.

Authors:  Tatsuhito Matsuo
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 7.  The SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein and Its Role in Viral Structure, Biological Functions, and a Potential Target for Drug or Vaccine Mitigation.

Authors:  Zhihua Bai; Ying Cao; Wenjun Liu; Jing Li
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  The Nucleocapsid Protein of SARS-CoV-2: a Target for Vaccine Development.

Authors:  Noton K Dutta; Kaushiki Mazumdar; James T Gordy
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Development of vaccines and passive immunotherapy against SARS corona virus using SCID-PBL/hu mouse models.

Authors:  Masaji Okada; Yoshinobu Okuno; Satomi Hashimoto; Yoko Kita; Noriko Kanamaru; Yasuko Nishida; Yoshie Tsunai; Ruriko Inoue; Hitoshi Nakatani; Reiko Fukamizu; Yumi Namie; Junko Yamada; Kyoko Takao; Ritsuko Asai; Ryoko Asaki; Tetsuo Kase; Yuji Takemoto; Shigeto Yoshida; J S M Peiris; Pei-Jer Chen; Naoki Yamamoto; Tatsuji Nomura; Isao Ishida; Shigeru Morikawa; Masato Tashiro; Mitsunori Sakatani
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Nanotechnology in vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Laura J Peek; C Russell Middaugh; Cory Berkland
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.