| Literature DB >> 36148165 |
Nadia Marascio1, Angela Quirino1, Giuseppe Guido Maria Scarlata1, Giorgio Settimo Barreca1, Aida Giancotti1, Angelo Giuseppe Lamberti1, Luigia Gallo1, Fabio Foti1, Domenico Luca Laurendi2, Daniela Dattola3, Antonino Marsico4, Antonia La Rocca4, Giovanni Matera1.
Abstract
Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) conducted on nasopharyngeal swabs is the gold standard in the diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Italy, recent guidelines indicate that rapid antigen tests (RATs) can be used for the isolation of positive patients or for the interruption of quarantine, but they are often less sensitive to detect positive subjects. Indeed, the performance of these RATs depends on the timing and the population on which they are evaluated. Herein, we evaluated the performance of BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag and Fluorecare® SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test during a population screening in the Calabria Region, Southern Italy. We report that both antigen test shows low sensitivity in contrast to the high sensitivity declared by manufacturer (90% and 92%, respectively) and that the area under the curve (AUC) was good for Fluorecare® SARS-CoV- 2 Spike Protein Test but very poor for BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag. We suggest that these RATs should be re-evaluated in the current pandemic era.Entities:
Keywords: RT-PCR; Rapid antigen tests; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2022 PMID: 36148165 PMCID: PMC9448309 DOI: 10.53854/liim-3003-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infez Med ISSN: 1124-9390