Literature DB >> 34194023

Ridgecrest aftershocks at Coso suppressed by thermal destressing.

Kyungjae Im1, Jean-Philippe Avouac2, Elías R Heimisson2,3, Derek Elsworth4,5.   

Abstract

Geothermal and volcanic areas are prone to earthquake triggering1,2. The Coso geothermal field in California lies just north of the surface ruptures driven by the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake (moment magnitude Mw = 7.1), in an area where changes in coseismic stress should have triggered aftershocks3,4. However, no aftershocks were observed there4. Here we show that 30 years of geothermal heat production at Coso depleted shear stresses within the geothermal reservoir. Thermal contraction of the reservoir initially induced substantial seismicity, as observed in the Coso geothermal reservoir, but subsequently depleted the stress available to drive the aftershocks during the Ridgecrest sequence. This destressing changed the faulting style of the reservoir and impeded aftershock triggering. Although unlikely to have been the case for the Ridgecrest earthquake, such a destressed zone could, in principle, impede the propagation of a large earthquake.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34194023     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03601-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  9 in total

1.  Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake.

Authors:  D P Hill; P A Reasenberg; A Michael; W J Arabaz; G Beroza; D Brumbaugh; J N Brune; R Castro; S Davis; D Depolo; W L Ellsworth; J Gomberg; S Harmsen; L House; S M Jackson; M J Johnston; L Jones; R Keller; S Malone; L Munguia; S Nava; J C Pechmann; A Sanford; R W Simpson; R B Smith; M Stark; M Stickney; A Vidal; S Walter; V Wong; J Zollweg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  INDUCED SEISMICITY. Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip.

Authors:  Yves Guglielmi; Frédéric Cappa; Jean-Philippe Avouac; Pierre Henry; Derek Elsworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The spatial footprint of injection wells in a global compilation of induced earthquake sequences.

Authors:  Thomas H W Goebel; Emily E Brodsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea.

Authors:  F Grigoli; S Cesca; A P Rinaldi; A Manconi; J A López-Comino; J F Clinton; R Westaway; C Cauzzi; T Dahm; S Wiemer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event.

Authors:  Kwang-Hee Kim; Jin-Han Ree; YoungHee Kim; Sungshil Kim; Su Young Kang; Wooseok Seo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.

Authors:  Zachary E Ross; Benjamín Idini; Zhe Jia; Oliver L Stephenson; Minyan Zhong; Xin Wang; Zhongwen Zhan; Mark Simons; Eric J Fielding; Sang-Ho Yun; Egill Hauksson; Angelyn W Moore; Zhen Liu; Jungkyo Jung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Stabilization of fault slip by fluid injection in the laboratory and in situ.

Authors:  Frédéric Cappa; Marco Maria Scuderi; Cristiano Collettini; Yves Guglielmi; Jean-Philippe Avouac
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Cascading and pulse-like ruptures during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes in the Eastern California Shear Zone.

Authors:  Kejie Chen; Jean-Philippe Avouac; Saif Aati; Chris Milliner; Fu Zheng; Chuang Shi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cooling-induced reactivation of distant faults during long-term geothermal energy production in hot sedimentary aquifers.

Authors:  Iman Rahimzadeh Kivi; Estanislao Pujades; Jonny Rutqvist; Víctor Vilarrasa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.