Literature DB >> 29700226

The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea.

F Grigoli1, S Cesca2, A P Rinaldi3, A Manconi4, J A López-Comino2, J F Clinton3, R Westaway5, C Cauzzi3, T Dahm2,6, S Wiemer3.   

Abstract

The moment magnitude (Mw) 5.5 earthquake that struck South Korea in November 2017 was one of the largest and most damaging events in that country over the past century. Its proximity to an enhanced geothermal system site, where high-pressure hydraulic injection had been performed during the previous 2 years, raises the possibility that this earthquake was anthropogenic. We have combined seismological and geodetic analyses to characterize the mainshock and its largest aftershocks, constrain the geometry of this seismic sequence, and shed light on its causal factors. According to our analysis, it seems plausible that the occurrence of this earthquake was influenced by the aforementioned industrial activities. Finally, we found that the earthquake transferred static stress to larger nearby faults, potentially increasing the seismic hazard in the area.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700226     DOI: 10.1126/science.aat2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  16 in total

1.  Earthquakes triggered by underground fluid injection modelled for a tectonically active oil field.

Authors:  Mirko van der Baan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Induced Seismicity and Acute Development of Anxiety and Stress-Related Mental Disorders: Findings from the 2017 Pohang Earthquake.

Authors:  Changwoo Han
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 11.035

3.  Analytical Solution to Assess the Induced Seismicity Potential of Faults in Pressurized and Depleted Reservoirs.

Authors:  Haiqing Wu; Victor Vilarrasa; Silvia De Simone; Maarten Saaltink; Francesco Parisio
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Ridgecrest aftershocks at Coso suppressed by thermal destressing.

Authors:  Kyungjae Im; Jean-Philippe Avouac; Elías R Heimisson; Derek Elsworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Energy of injection-induced seismicity predicted from in-situ experiments.

Authors:  Louis De Barros; Frédéric Cappa; Yves Guglielmi; Laure Duboeuf; Jean-Robert Grasso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The risks of long-term re-injection in supercritical geothermal systems.

Authors:  Francesco Parisio; Victor Vilarrasa; Wenqing Wang; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Operational and geological controls of coupled poroelastic stressing and pore-pressure accumulation along faults: Induced earthquakes in Pohang, South Korea.

Authors:  Kyung Won Chang; Hongkyu Yoon; YoungHee Kim; Moo Yul Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Relaxation damage control via fatigue-hydraulic fracturing in granitic rock as inferred from laboratory-, mine-, and field-scale experiments.

Authors:  Arno Zang; Günter Zimmermann; Hannes Hofmann; Peter Niemz; Kwang Yeom Kim; Melvin Diaz; Li Zhuang; Jeoung Seok Yoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Hydraulic Fracturing Experiment Investigation for the Application of Geothermal Energy Extraction.

Authors:  Yuxiang Cheng; Yanjun Zhang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-04-07

10.  Understanding rate effects in injection-induced earthquakes.

Authors:  Maryam Alghannam; Ruben Juanes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.