Literature DB >> 29700224

Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event.

Kwang-Hee Kim1, Jin-Han Ree2, YoungHee Kim3, Sungshil Kim4, Su Young Kang5, Wooseok Seo5.   

Abstract

The moment magnitude (Mw) 5.4 Pohang earthquake, the most damaging event in South Korea since instrumental seismic observation began in 1905, occurred beneath the Pohang geothermal power plant in 2017. Geological and geophysical data suggest that the Pohang earthquake was induced by fluid from an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) site, which was injected directly into a near-critically stressed subsurface fault zone. The magnitude of the mainshock makes it the largest known induced earthquake at an EGS site.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Year:  2018        PMID: 29700224     DOI: 10.1126/science.aat6081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  16 in total

1.  Earthquakes triggered by underground fluid injection modelled for a tectonically active oil field.

Authors:  Mirko van der Baan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Induced Seismicity and Acute Development of Anxiety and Stress-Related Mental Disorders: Findings from the 2017 Pohang Earthquake.

Authors:  Changwoo Han
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 11.035

3.  Analytical Solution to Assess the Induced Seismicity Potential of Faults in Pressurized and Depleted Reservoirs.

Authors:  Haiqing Wu; Victor Vilarrasa; Silvia De Simone; Maarten Saaltink; Francesco Parisio
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  Seismic velocity changes in the Groningen reservoir associated with distant drilling.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Hanneke Paulssen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Ridgecrest aftershocks at Coso suppressed by thermal destressing.

Authors:  Kyungjae Im; Jean-Philippe Avouac; Elías R Heimisson; Derek Elsworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Energy of injection-induced seismicity predicted from in-situ experiments.

Authors:  Louis De Barros; Frédéric Cappa; Yves Guglielmi; Laure Duboeuf; Jean-Robert Grasso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The risks of long-term re-injection in supercritical geothermal systems.

Authors:  Francesco Parisio; Victor Vilarrasa; Wenqing Wang; Olaf Kolditz; Thomas Nagel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Operational and geological controls of coupled poroelastic stressing and pore-pressure accumulation along faults: Induced earthquakes in Pohang, South Korea.

Authors:  Kyung Won Chang; Hongkyu Yoon; YoungHee Kim; Moo Yul Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Earthquakes and very deep groundwater perturbation mutually induced.

Authors:  Dugin Kaown; Kang-Kun Lee; Jaeyeon Kim; Jeong-Ung Woo; Sanghoon Lee; In-Woo Park; Daeha Lee; Jin-Yong Lee; Heejung Kim; Shemin Ge; In-Wook Yeo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effective time- and frequency-domain techniques for interpreting seismic precursors in groundwater level fluctuations on Jeju Island, Korea.

Authors:  Hak Soo Hwang; Se-Yeong Hamm; Jae-Yeol Cheong; Soo-Hyoung Lee; Kyoochul Ha; Cholwoo Lee; Nam-Chil Woo; Sul-Min Yun; Kwang-Hee Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.