Literature DB >> 17810202

Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake.

D P Hill, P A Reasenberg, A Michael, W J Arabaz, G Beroza, D Brumbaugh, J N Brune, R Castro, S Davis, D Depolo, W L Ellsworth, J Gomberg, S Harmsen, L House, S M Jackson, M J Johnston, L Jones, R Keller, S Malone, L Munguia, S Nava, J C Pechmann, A Sanford, R W Simpson, R B Smith, M Stark, M Stickney, A Vidal, S Walter, V Wong, J Zollweg.   

Abstract

The magnitude 7.3 Landers earthquake of 28 June 1992 triggered a remarkably sudden and widespread increase in earthquake activity across much of the western United States. The triggered earthquakes, which occurred at distances up to 1250 kilometers (17 source dimensions) from the Landers mainshock, were confined to areas of persistent seismicity and strike-slip to normal faulting. Many of the triggered areas also are sites of geothermal and recent volcanic activity. Static stress changes calculated for elastic models of the earthquake appear to be too small to have caused the triggering. The most promising explanations involve nonlinear interactions between large dynamic strains accompanying seismic waves from the mainshock and crustal fluids (perhaps including crustal magma).

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 17810202     DOI: 10.1126/science.260.5114.1617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  25 in total

1.  Scaling in geology: landforms and earthquakes.

Authors:  D L Turcotte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Initiation process of earthquakes and its implications for seismic hazard reduction strategy.

Authors:  H Kanamori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Global risk of big earthquakes has not recently increased.

Authors:  Peter M Shearer; Philip B Stark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How many great earthquakes should we expect?

Authors:  Gregory C Beroza
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The 2009 Samoa-Tonga great earthquake triggered doublet.

Authors:  Thorne Lay; Charles J Ammon; Hiroo Kanamori; Luis Rivera; Keith D Koper; Alexander R Hutko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Decay of aftershock density with distance does not indicate triggering by dynamic stress.

Authors:  Keith Richards-Dinger; Ross S Stein; Shinji Toda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Remote triggering of fault-strength changes on the San Andreas fault at Parkfield.

Authors:  Taka'aki Taira; Paul G Silver; Fenglin Niu; Robert M Nadeau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Slow earthquakes triggered by typhoons.

Authors:  ChiChing Liu; Alan T Linde; I Selwyn Sacks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Induced and endogenous acoustic oscillations in granular faults.

Authors:  L de Arcangelis; E Lippiello; M Pica Ciamarra; A Sarracino
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The 11 April 2012 east Indian Ocean earthquake triggered large aftershocks worldwide.

Authors:  Fred F Pollitz; Ross S Stein; Volkan Sevilgen; Roland Bürgmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.