Literature DB >> 34192436

Problems with Using Polygenic Scores to Select Embryos.

Patrick Turley1, Michelle N Meyer1, Nancy Wang1, David Cesarini1, Evelynn Hammonds1, Alicia R Martin1, Benjamin M Neale1, Heidi L Rehm1, Louise Wilkins-Haug1, Daniel J Benjamin1, Steven Hyman1, David Laibson1, Peter M Visscher1.   

Abstract

Companies have recently begun to sell a new service to patients considering in vitro fertilization: embryo selection based on polygenic scores (ESPS). These scores represent individualized predictions of health and other outcomes derived from genomewide association studies in adults to partially predict these outcomes. This article includes a discussion of many factors that lower the predictive power of polygenic scores in the context of embryo selection and quantifies these effects for a variety of clinical and nonclinical traits. Also discussed are potential unintended consequences of ESPS (including selecting for adverse traits, altering population demographics, exacerbating inequalities in society, and devaluing certain traits). Recommendations for the responsible communication about ESPS by practitioners are provided, and a call for a society-wide conversation about this technology is made. (Funded by the National Institute on Aging and others.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34192436      PMCID: PMC8387884          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsr2105065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  34 in total

1.  Screening Human Embryos for Polygenic Traits Has Limited Utility.

Authors:  Ehud Karavani; Or Zuk; Danny Zeevi; Nir Barzilai; Nikos C Stefanis; Alex Hatzimanolis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Leonid Kruglyak; Gil Atzmon; Max Lam; Todd Lencz; Shai Carmi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Towards clinical utility of polygenic risk scores.

Authors:  Samuel A Lambert; Gad Abraham; Michael Inouye
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities.

Authors:  Alicia R Martin; Masahiro Kanai; Yoichiro Kamatani; Yukinori Okada; Benjamin M Neale; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Heterozygous mutations of growth hormone receptor gene in children with idiopathic short stature.

Authors:  Eugenio Bonioli; Marina Tarò; Carmen La Rosa; Amedeo Citana; Roberto Bertorelli; Guido Morcaldi; Roberto Gastaldi; Domenico A Coviello
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.372

5.  Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribe.

Authors:  M Bobbio; B Demichelis; G Giustetto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Elke Kurz-Milcke; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2007-11-01

7.  The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.

Authors:  D J Malenka; J A Baron; S Johansen; J W Wahrenberger; J M Ross
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Implementing Expanded Prenatal Genetic Testing: Should Parents Have Access to Any and All Fetal Genetic Information?

Authors:  Michelle J Bayefsky; Benjamin E Berkman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 9.  Polygenic risk scores: from research tools to clinical instruments.

Authors:  Cathryn M Lewis; Evangelos Vassos
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 11.117

10.  Utility and First Clinical Application of Screening Embryos for Polygenic Disease Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Jennifer Eccles; Lou Lello; Elan Bechor; Jeffrey Hsu; Kathryn Plunkett; Raymond Zimmerman; Bhavini Rana; Artem Samoilenko; Steven Hsu; Laurent C A M Tellier
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.555

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Maria Siermann; Zoë Claesen; Laurent Pasquier; Taneli Raivio; Olga Tšuiko; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-14

2.  Psychiatric polygenic risk scores: Child and adolescent psychiatrists' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences.

Authors:  Stacey Pereira; Katrina A Muñoz; Brent J Small; Takahiro Soda; Laura N Torgerson; Clarissa E Sanchez; Jehannine Austin; Eric A Storch; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.358

3.  The controversial embryo tests that promise a better baby.

Authors:  Max Kozlov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Polygenic embryo screening: four clinical considerations warrant further attention.

Authors:  S Pereira; S Carmi; G Altarescu; J Austin; D Barlevy; A Hershlag; E Juengst; K Kostick-Quenet; E Kovanci; R B Lathi; M Mukherjee; I Van den Veyver; O Zuk; G Lázaro-Muñoz; T Lencz
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.353

Review 5.  Open problems in human trait genetics.

Authors:  Nadav Brandes; Omer Weissbrod; Michal Linial
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 17.906

6.  Polygenic scores in biomedical research.

Authors:  Iftikhar J Kullo; Cathryn M Lewis; Michael Inouye; Alicia R Martin; Samuli Ripatti; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 59.581

Review 7.  Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 87.241

8.  Embryo Screening for Polygenic Disease Risk: Recent Advances and Ethical Considerations.

Authors:  Laurent C A M Tellier; Jennifer Eccles; Nathan R Treff; Louis Lello; Simon Fishel; Stephen Hsu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  The Future of IVF: The New Normal in Human Reproduction.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Gary D Smith; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 10.  Ethical, anticipatory genomics research on human behavior means celebrating disagreement.

Authors:  Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko; Sam Trejo
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.