Literature DB >> 31363735

Towards clinical utility of polygenic risk scores.

Samuel A Lambert1,2,3,4, Gad Abraham1,2,5, Michael Inouye1,2,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Prediction of disease risk is an essential part of preventative medicine, often guiding clinical management. Risk prediction typically includes risk factors such as age, sex, family history of disease and lifestyle (e.g. smoking status); however, in recent years, there has been increasing interest to include genomic information into risk models. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) aggregate the effects of many genetic variants across the human genome into a single score and have recently been shown to have predictive value for multiple common diseases. In this review, we summarize the potential use cases for seven common diseases (breast cancer, prostate cancer, coronary artery disease, obesity, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer's disease) where PRS has or could have clinical utility. PRS analysis for these diseases frequently revolved around (i) risk prediction performance of a PRS alone and in combination with other non-genetic risk factors, (ii) estimation of lifetime risk trajectories, (iii) the independent information of PRS and family history of disease or monogenic mutations and (iv) estimation of the value of adding a PRS to specific clinical risk prediction scenarios. We summarize open questions regarding PRS usability, ancestry bias and transferability, emphasizing the need for the next wave of studies to focus on the implementation and health-economic value of PRS testing. In conclusion, it is becoming clear that PRS have value in disease risk prediction and there are multiple areas where this may have clinical utility.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31363735     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddz187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  120 in total

Review 1.  Polygenic Scores to Assess Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Clinical Perspectives and Basic Implications.

Authors:  Krishna G Aragam; Pradeep Natarajan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Holistic cancer genome profiling for every patient.

Authors:  Serena Nik-Zainal; Yasin Memari; Helen R Davies
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 3.  Polygenic Risk Scores to Identify CVD Risk and Tailor Therapy: Hope or Hype?

Authors:  Charles A German; Michael D Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Harveian Oration 2019: Prediction and prevention in the genomic era.

Authors:  John Burn
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Combined Utility of 25 Disease and Risk Factor Polygenic Risk Scores for Stratifying Risk of All-Cause Mortality.

Authors:  Allison Meisner; Prosenjit Kundu; Yan Dora Zhang; Lauren V Lan; Sungwon Kim; Disha Ghandwani; Parichoy Pal Choudhury; Sonja I Berndt; Neal D Freedman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Electronic health records and polygenic risk scores for predicting disease risk.

Authors:  Ruowang Li; Yong Chen; Marylyn D Ritchie; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 7.  Genetic prediction of complex traits with polygenic scores: a statistical review.

Authors:  Ying Ma; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Combined application of genetic and polygenic risk scores for type 1 diabetes risk prediction.

Authors:  Hui-Qi Qu; Jingchun Qu; Jonathan Bradfield; Joseph Glessner; Xiao Chang; Michael March; Frank D Mentch; Jeffrey D Roizen; John J Connolly; Patrick Sleiman; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Clinical Evaluation of the Polygenetic Background of Blood Pressure in the Population-Based Setting.

Authors:  Cristiano Fava; Olle Melander; Alice Giontella; Marketa Sjögren; Luca A Lotta; John D Overton; Aris Baras; Pietro Minuz
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Polygenic prediction of atopic dermatitis improves with atopic training and filaggrin factors.

Authors:  Christopher H Arehart; Michelle Daya; Monica Campbell; Meher Preethi Boorgula; Nicholas Rafaels; Sameer Chavan; Gloria David; Jon Hanifin; Mark K Slifka; Richard L Gallo; Tissa Hata; Lynda C Schneider; Amy S Paller; Peck Y Ong; Jonathan M Spergel; Emma Guttman-Yassky; Donald Y M Leung; Lisa A Beck; Christopher R Gignoux; Rasika A Mathias; Kathleen C Barnes
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.