Literature DB >> 34190612

ImuA Facilitates SOS Mutagenesis by Inhibiting RecA-Mediated Activity in Myxococcus xanthus.

Duohong Sheng1, Ye Wang1, Zhiwei Jiang1, Dongkai Liu1, Yuezhong Li1.   

Abstract

Bacteria have two pathways to restart stalled replication forks caused by environmental stresses, error-prone translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) catalyzed by TLS polymerase and error-free template switching catalyzed by RecA, and their competition on the arrested fork affects bacterial SOS mutagenesis. DnaE2 is an error-prone TLS polymerase, and its functions require ImuA and ImuB. Here, we investigated the transcription of imuA, imuB, and dnaE2 in UV-C-irradiated Myxococcus xanthus and found that the induction of imuA occurred significantly earlier than that of the other two genes. Mutant analysis showed that unlike that of imuB or dnaE2, the deletion of imuA significantly delayed bacterial regrowth and slightly reduced the bacterial mutation frequency and UV resistance. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that the absence of ImuA released the expression of some known SOS genes, including recA1, recA2, imuB, and dnaE2. Yeast two-hybrid and pulldown analyses proved that ImuA interacts physically with RecA1 besides ImuB. Protein activity analysis indicated that ImuA had no DNA-binding activity but inhibited the DNA-binding and recombinase activity of RecA1. These findings indicate the new role of ImuA in SOS mutagenesis; that is, ImuA inhibits the recombinase activity of RecA1, thereby facilitating SOS mutagenesis in M. xanthus. IMPORTANCE DnaE2 is responsible for bacterial SOS mutagenesis in nearly one-third of sequenced bacterial strains. However, its mechanism, especially the function of one of its accessory proteins, ImuA, is still unclear. Here, we report that M. xanthus ImuA could affect SOS mutagenesis by inhibiting the recombinase activity of RecA1, which helps to explain the mechanism of DnaE2-dependent TLS and the selection of the two restart pathways to repair the stalled replication fork.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DnaE2; ImuA; Myxococcus xanthus; SOS mutagenesis; replication restart

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34190612      PMCID: PMC8388814          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00919-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  DNA replication during aggregation phase is essential for Myxococcus xanthus development.

Authors:  Linfong Tzeng; Terri N Ellis; Mitchell Singer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  DNA damage responses in prokaryotes: regulating gene expression, modulating growth patterns, and manipulating replication forks.

Authors:  Kenneth N Kreuzer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Evolution of sensory complexity recorded in a myxobacterial genome.

Authors:  B S Goldman; W C Nierman; D Kaiser; S C Slater; A S Durkin; J A Eisen; J Eisen; C M Ronning; W B Barbazuk; M Blanchard; C Field; C Halling; G Hinkle; O Iartchuk; H S Kim; C Mackenzie; R Madupu; N Miller; A Shvartsbeyn; S A Sullivan; M Vaudin; R Wiegand; H B Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  SOS, the formidable strategy of bacteria against aggressions.

Authors:  Zeynep Baharoglu; Didier Mazel
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  DNA strand exchange promoted by RecA K72R. Two reaction phases with different Mg2+ requirements.

Authors:  Q Shan; M M Cox; R B Inman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-03-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Properties and functions of Escherichia coli: Pol IV and Pol V.

Authors:  Robert P Fuchs; Shingo Fujii; Jérôme Wagner
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2004

Review 7.  Template-switching during replication fork repair in bacteria.

Authors:  Susan T Lovett
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-06-13

8.  Social gliding is correlated with the presence of pili in Myxococcus xanthus.

Authors:  D Kaiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Mutations for Worse or Better: Low-Fidelity DNA Synthesis by SOS DNA Polymerase V Is a Tightly Regulated Double-Edged Sword.

Authors:  Malgorzata Jaszczur; Jeffrey G Bertram; Andrew Robinson; Antoine M van Oijen; Roger Woodgate; Michael M Cox; Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  New insights into the structures and interactions of bacterial Y-family DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Kęstutis Timinskas; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.