Literature DB >> 6605779

Self-reported dark red bleeding as a marker comparable with occult blood testing in screening for large bowel neoplasms.

A J Silman, P Mitchell, R J Nicholls, F A Macrae, R J Leicester, C I Bartram, M J Simmons, P D Campbell, C E Hearn, P J Constable.   

Abstract

The study was designed to determine the prevalence of large bowel symptoms in an adult working population and to assess their value in screening for large bowel neoplasms. A symptom questionnaire was sent to workers in two large organizations and the results were compared with faecal occult blood testing in the same individuals using Haemoccult (Eaton Laboratories). Completed symptom questionnaires and Haemoccult test kits were returned by 916 out of a total of 1805 employees over the age of 40 (compliance 50.7 per cent). Twenty-eight (3.1 per cent) were Haemoccult positive and 114 (12.4 per cent) had one or more symptoms. All positives (129 persons) were examined by flexible sigmoidoscopy and barium enema. No cancer was found but 7 patients with adenomas greater than 10 mm diameter were discovered. Each of the 7 patients reported at least one symptom (dark red bleeding in 4, bright red bleeding in 2 and diarrhoea in 1) and 6 were Haemoccult positive. There was no individual with a Haemoccult positive adenoma without symptoms. Predictive values for adenomas over 10 mm for Haemoccult positive tests (21 per cent), self-reported dark bleeding (16 per cent) and diarrhoea (17 per cent), were significantly higher than for other symptoms. The predictive value rose significantly to 46 per cent for Haemoccult-positive patients who in addition had at least one symptom (P less than 0.05) and to 57 per cent for Haemoccult positive with dark bleeding. These combinations of Haemoccult- and symptom-positive results increased the specificity of 97.6 per cent for Haemoccult alone to values over 99 per cent without reducing sensitivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6605779     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800701209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

1.  Delay in consulting a medical practitioner about rectal bleeding.

Authors:  J E Byles; S Redman; D Hennrikus; R W Sanson-Fisher; J Dickinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy.

Authors:  J V Metcalf; J Smith; R Jones; C O Record
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Colorectal cancer prevention. An approach to increasing compliance in a faecal occult blood test screening programme.

Authors:  A R Hart; J Eaden; S Barnett; A M de Bono; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  A comparison of methods for increasing compliance within a general practitioner based screening project for colorectal cancer and the effect on practitioner workload.

Authors:  G Pye; M Christie; J O Chamberlain; S M Moss; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  [Empirical study of the assessment of diagnostic procedures as exemplified by the Hemoccult test].

Authors:  J Windeler; J Köbberling
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1986-10-31

6.  An evaluation of a direct access flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy service.

Authors:  K D Vellacott; A M Roe; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Colonoscopic evaluation of hematochezia in low and average risk patients for colorectal cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Puglisi Carlo; Russo-Francesco Paolo; Barbera Carmelo; Incarbone Salvatore; Aprile Giuseppe; Bonanno Giacomo; Russo Antonio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Hematochezia in the young patient: a review of health-seeking behavior, physician attitudes, and controversies in management.

Authors:  Rashid Khan; David Hyman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  An industry based approach to colorectal cancer screening in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  A R Hart; N Glover; J Howick-Baker; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding.

Authors:  E J Irvine; J O'Connor; R A Frost; P Shorvon; S Somers; G W Stevenson; R H Hunt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.