Literature DB >> 2658352

Screening for colorectal cancer: a critical review.

J D Hardcastle, G Pye.   

Abstract

This article discusses the place of symptom detection, endoscopy, and fecal occult blood testing in population screening for colorectal cancer. There is now considerable evidence that screening the population over the age of 50 years for occult blood in the feces will result in an increased yield of tumors localized to the bowel at the time of surgical treatment. These tumors also have other favorable prognostic features and it is likely that the prognosis of this group will be better than the prognosis of patients presenting with symptoms in the usual way. Because of the biases that result from the selection and detection of tumors in screening studies, the mortality results of the control trials now underway must be awaited until it is known whether population screening is of real value. In chemical fecal occult blood screening tests, a compromise has to be made between sensitivity and specificity. The fecal occult blood test most widely used and the one that has been subjected to the most evaluation in screening studies is the guaiac-based slide test, Hemoccult. The predictive value of a positive test for invasive cancer is 11-17%, and for adenomas, 36-41%. This specificity is achieved at a loss of sensitivity, the interval cancer rate reported in screening studies being over 20%. Newly developed immunological techniques appear to be more sensitive and specific, but require further evaluation in population screening studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2658352     DOI: 10.1007/bf01671152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  51 in total

1.  Hemoccult detection of fecal occult blood quantitated by radioassay.

Authors:  J R Stroehlein; V F Fairbanks; D B McGill; V L Go
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1976-10

2.  A comparison of methods for increasing compliance within a general practitioner based screening project for colorectal cancer and the effect on practitioner workload.

Authors:  G Pye; M Christie; J O Chamberlain; S M Moss; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Detection and diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Fecal blood loss in patients with colonic polyps: a comparison of measurements with 51chromium-labeled erythrocytes and with the Haemoccult test.

Authors:  P Herzog; K H Holtermüller; J Preiss; J Fischer; K Ewe; H J Schreiber; M Berres
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Colon cancer screening: the Minnesota experience.

Authors:  V Gilbertsen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  An immunologic test for fecal occult blood by counter immunoelectrophoresis. Higher sensitivity and higher positive reactions in colorectal cancer than single radial immunodiffusion and hemoccult test.

Authors:  H Saito; S Tsuchida; S Nakaji; R Kakizaki; T Aisawa; A Munakata; Y Yoshida
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  An assessment of occult blood testing to determine which patients with large bowel symptoms require urgent investigation.

Authors:  P A Farrands; D O'Regan; I Taylor
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. Results of a controlled trial.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; N C Armitage; J Chamberlain; S S Amar; P D James; T W Balfour
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Surveillance for colorectal cancer in average-risk patients, familial high-risk groups, and patients with adenomas.

Authors:  S J Winawer; P Sherlock
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A comparison of an immunological faecal occult blood test Fecatwin sensitive/FECA EIA with Haemoccult in population screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N Armitage; J D Hardcastle; S S Amar; T W Balfour; J Haynes; P D James
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Four-year evaluation of a direct-access fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy service.

Authors:  M N Vipond; V Moshakis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  General surgery.

Authors:  I Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Feasibility study of colonoscopy as the primary screening investigation in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J M Gilbert; C J Vaizey; P G Cassell; J Holden
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Colon cancer incidence: recent trends in the United States.

Authors:  W H Chow; S S Devesa; W J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Colo-rectal carcinoma 1975 and 1990: no improvement in the stage of disease at resection.

Authors:  I A Robinson; D O Hourihane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Adjuvant therapy for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  U Metzger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W J Campbell; R J Moorehead
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1997-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.