Literature DB >> 34179219

Multi-class medical image segmentation using one-vs-rest graph cuts and majority voting.

Yu-Chi Hu1,2, Gikas Mageras1, Michael Grossberg2.   

Abstract

Purpose: Semi-automatic image segmentation is still a valuable tool in clinical applications since it retains the expert oversights legally required. However, semi-automatic methods for simultaneous multi-class segmentation are difficult to be clinically implemented due to the complexity of underlining algorithms. We purpose an efficient one-vs-rest graph cut approach of which the complexity only grows linearly as the number of classes increases. Approach: Given an image slice, we construct multiple one-vs-rest graphs, each for a tissue class, for inference of a conditional random field (CRF). The one-vs-rest graph cut is to minimize the CRF energy derived from regional and boundary class probabilities estimated from random forests to obtain a one-vs-rest segmentation. The final segmentation is obtained by fusing from those one-vs-rest segmentations based on majority voting. We compare our method to a well-used multi-class graph cut method, alpha-beta swap, and a fully connected CRF (FCCRF) method, in brain tumor segmentation of 20 high-grade tumor cases in 2013 MICCAI dataset.
Results: Our method achieved mean Dice score of 0.83 for whole tumor, compared to 0.80 by alpha-beta swap and 0.79 by FCCRF. There was a performance improvement over alpha-beta swap by a factor of five. Conclusions: Our method utilizes the probabilistic-based CRF which can be estimated from any machine learning technique. Comparing to traditional multi-class graph cut, the purposed one-vs-rest approach has complexity that grows only linearly as the number of classes increases, therefore, our method can be applicable for both online semi-automatic and offline automatic segmentation in clinical applications.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  conditional random field; graph cuts; multi-class segmentation; semi-automatic segmentation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34179219      PMCID: PMC8223166          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.034003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  8 in total

1.  What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?

Authors:  Vladimir Kolmogorov; Ramin Zabih
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Robert Brandt; Randolf Menzel; Calvin R Maurer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multiatlas-based segmentation with preregistration atlas selection.

Authors:  Thomas R Langerak; Floris F Berendsen; Uulke A Van der Heide; Alexis N T J Kotte; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Multi-atlas based segmentation using probabilistic label fusion with adaptive weighting of image similarity measures.

Authors:  C Sjöberg; A Ahnesjö
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Mindboggle: automated brain labeling with multiple atlases.

Authors:  Arno Klein; Brett Mensh; Satrajit Ghosh; Jason Tourville; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  How much will linked deformable registrations decrease the quality of multi-atlas segmentation fusions?

Authors:  Carl Sjöberg; Silvia Johansson; Anders Ahnesjö
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Topological Voting Method for Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Nga T T Nguyen; Phuong B Le
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  Unified Deep Learning-Based Mouse Brain MR Segmentation: Template-Based Individual Brain Positron Emission Tomography Volumes-of-Interest Generation Without Spatial Normalization in Mouse Alzheimer Model.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Seo; Soo-Jong Kim; Jungsu S Oh; Jinwha Chung; Seog-Young Kim; Seung Jun Oh; Segyeong Joo; Jae Seung Kim
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Performance and Robustness of Regional Image Segmentation Driven by Selected Evolutionary and Genetic Algorithms: Study on MR Articular Cartilage Images.

Authors:  Jan Kubicek; Alice Varysova; Martin Cerny; Kristyna Hancarova; David Oczka; Martin Augustynek; Marek Penhaker; Ondrej Prokop; Radomir Scurek
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.847

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.