Literature DB >> 24007134

Multiatlas-based segmentation with preregistration atlas selection.

Thomas R Langerak1, Floris F Berendsen, Uulke A Van der Heide, Alexis N T J Kotte, Josien P W Pluim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Automatic, atlas-based segmentation of medical images benefits from using multiple atlases, mainly in terms of robustness. However, a large disadvantage of using multiple atlases is the large computation time that is involved in registering atlas images to the target image. This paper aims to reduce the computation load of multiatlas-based segmentation by heuristically selecting atlases before registration.
METHODS: To be able to select atlases, pairwise registrations are performed for all atlas combinations. Based on the results of these registrations, atlases are clustered, such that each cluster contains atlas that registers well to each other. This can all be done in a preprocessing step. Then, the representatives of each cluster are registered to the target image. The quality of the result of this registration is estimated for each of the representatives and used to decide which clusters to fully register to the target image. Finally, the segmentations of the registered images are combined into a single segmentation in a label fusion procedure.
RESULTS: The authors perform multiatlas segmentation once with postregistration atlas selection and once with the proposed preregistration method, using a set of 182 segmented atlases of prostate cancer patients. The authors performed the full set of 182 leave-one-out experiments and in each experiment compared the result of the atlas-based segmentation procedure to the known segmentation of the atlas that was chosen as a target image. The results show that preregistration atlas selection is slightly less accurate than postregistration atlas selection, but this is not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results the authors conclude that the proposed method is able to reduce the number of atlases that have to be registered to the target image with 80% on average, without compromising segmentation accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24007134     DOI: 10.1118/1.4816654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  BrainSegNet: a convolutional neural network architecture for automated segmentation of human brain structures.

Authors:  Raghav Mehta; Aabhas Majumdar; Jayanthi Sivaswamy
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-04-20

3.  FCN Based Label Correction for Multi-Atlas Guided Organ Segmentation.

Authors:  Hancan Zhu; Ehsan Adeli; Feng Shi; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-04

Review 4.  Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: A survey.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Mert R Sabuncu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  3D whole brain segmentation using spatially localized atlas network tiles.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Zhoubing Xu; Yunxi Xiong; Katherine Aboud; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Shunxing Bao; Camilo Bermudez; Susan M Resnick; Laurie E Cutting; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  SOMA: Subject-, object-, and modality-adapted precision atlas approach for automatic anatomy recognition and delineation in medical images.

Authors:  Jieyu Li; Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Yubing Tong; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Multi-atlas learner fusion: An efficient segmentation approach for large-scale data.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Plassard; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  A fully automatic multi-atlas based segmentation method for prostate MR images.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tian; LiZhi Liu; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-20

9.  Brain extraction in pediatric ADC maps, toward characterizing neuro-development in multi-platform and multi-institution clinical images.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Randy L Gollub; Kallirroi Retzepi; Nathaniel Reynolds; Rudolph Pienaar; Steve Pieper; Shawn N Murphy; P Ellen Grant; Lilla Zöllei
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Atlas-guided prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning.

Authors:  Yang Sheng; Taoran Li; You Zhang; W Robert Lee; Fang-Fang Yin; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.