| Literature DB >> 34172893 |
David P Steensma1, Martin Wermke2, Virginia M Klimek3, Peter L Greenberg4, Patricia Font5, Rami S Komrokji6, Jay Yang7, Andrew M Brunner8, Hetty E Carraway9, Lionel Ades10, Aref Al-Kali11, Juan M Alonso-Dominguez12, Ana Alfonso-Piérola13, Catherine C Coombs14, H Joachim Deeg15, Ian Flinn16, James M Foran17, Guillermo Garcia-Manero18, Michael B Maris19, Malgorzata McMasters20, Jean-Baptiste Micol21, Jaime Perez De Oteyza22, Felicitas Thol23, Eunice S Wang24, Justin M Watts25, Justin Taylor25, Richard Stone1, Vikram Gourineni26, Alyssa J Marino26, Huilan Yao26, Benoit Destenaves26, Xiaobin Yuan27, Kun Yu26, Sara Dar26, Lernik Ohanjanian26, Keisuke Kuida26, Jianjun Xiao26, Catherine Scholz26, Antonio Gualberto28, Uwe Platzbecker29.
Abstract
We conducted a phase I clinical trial of H3B-8800, an oral small molecule that binds Splicing Factor 3B1 (SF3B1), in patients with MDS, CMML, or AML. Among 84 enrolled patients (42 MDS, 4 CMML and 38 AML), 62 were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent at study entry. Dose escalation cohorts examined two once-daily dosing regimens: schedule I (5 days on/9 days off, range of doses studied 1-40 mg, n = 65) and schedule II (21 days on/7 days off, 7-20 mg, n = 19); 27 patients received treatment for ≥180 days. The most common treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. No complete or partial responses meeting IWG criteria were observed; however, RBC transfusion free intervals >56 days were observed in nine patients who were transfusion dependent at study entry (15%). Of 15 MDS patients with missense SF3B1 mutations, five experienced RBC transfusion independence (TI). Elevated pre-treatment expression of aberrant transcripts of Transmembrane Protein 14C (TMEM14C), an SF3B1 splicing target encoding a mitochondrial porphyrin transporter, was observed in MDS patients experiencing RBC TI. In summary, H3B-8800 treatment was associated with mostly low-grade TAEs and induced RBC TI in a biomarker-defined subset of MDS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34172893 PMCID: PMC8632688 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01328-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528
Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients.
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Median age (range), years | 74 (46–87) |
| Male, | 61 (73) |
| Race, | |
| White | 72 (86) |
| Black or African American | 2 (2) |
| Asian | 2 (2) |
| Other or missing | 8 (10) |
| ECOG performance status, | |
| 0 | 18 (21) |
| 1 | 59 (70) |
| 2 | 7 (8) |
| Previous anticancer regimens, | |
| 0 | 3 (4) |
| 1 | 33 (39.3) |
| 2 | 24 (29) |
| ≥3 | 24 (29) |
| Prior anticancer regimens, median | 2 |
| Prior HMA treatment, | 73 (87) |
| Transfusion dependence,a
| |
| RBC | 62 (71) |
| Platelet | 34 (41) |
| Disease | |
| | 42 (50)b |
| Lower risk | 21 (25) |
| Higher risk | 20 (24) |
| IPSS missing | 1 (1) |
| | 4 (5) |
| Lower risk | 1 (1) |
| Higher risk | 3 (4) |
| | 38 (45) |
AML acute myeloid leukemia, CMML chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, HMA hypomethylating agent, IPSS International Prognostic Scoring System, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, RBC red blood cell.
aAssessed using International Working Group criteria [23].
bOne patient had a diagnosis of RARS-T (MDS/MPN overlap syndrome).
Fig. 1Swimmer plot of enrolled patients and their duration of therapy by disease subtype and spliceosome missense mutation at baseline.
A Lower-risk MDS or CMML, B higher-risk MDS or CMML, and C AML. Colors designate the dose level of enrolled patients. *CMML patient. AML acute myeloid leukemia, CMML chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, QD once daily.
Common treatment-related TEAEs (all grades) reported in ≥10% of patients by dosing schedule.
| Preferred term | Dose (QD), | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, 2, 3.5, & 5 mg | 7 mg | 10 mg | 12 mg | 14 mg | 20 mg | 30 mg | 40 mg | Total | |
| Any TEAE | 19 (76) | 11 (79) | 3 (43) | – | 5 (100) | 3 (75) | 4 (100) | 5 (83) | 50 (77) |
| Diarrhea | 7 (28) | 4 (29) | 2 (29) | – | 5 (100) | 1 (25) | 3 (75) | 5 (83) | 27 (42) |
| Nausea | 3 (12) | 4 (29) | 2 (29) | – | 1 (20) | 2 (50) | 3 (75) | 3 (50) | 18 (28) |
| Fatigue | 3 (12) | 2 (14) | 1 (14) | – | 0 | 2 (50) | 1 (25) | 2 (33) | 11 (17) |
| Vomiting | 1 (4) | 2 (14) | 2 (29) | – | 1 (20) | 0 | 0 | 3 (50) | 9 (14) |
Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related TEAEs reported in >2% of patients by dosing schedule.
| Preferred term | Schedule I, | Schedule II, |
|---|---|---|
| Anemia | 4 (6) | 0 |
| ECG QTcF prolonged | 2 (3) | 1 (5) |
| Fatigue | 2 (3) | 1 (5) |
| Platelet count decreased | 2 (3) | 1 (5) |
| Hypophosphatemia | 0 | 1 (5) |
| Nausea | 0 | 1 (5) |
| Sinus bradycardia | 0 | 1 (5) |
The severity of TEAEs was graded using NCI-CTCAE (version 4.03).
ECG electrocardiogram, NCI-CTCAE National Cancer Institute Common Terminology for Clinical Adverse Events, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event.
Fig. 2H3B-8800 pharmacokinetics.
Plasma concentration in ng/mL of H3B-8800 on Cycle 1 Day 4 (depicted) for schedule I. h hours.
Summary of H3B-8800 plasma PK parameters on Day 4 following once-daily dose regiments.
| Statistical summary of plasma PK parameters on Day 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose (mg) | Tmax (h) | Cmax (µg/L) | AUC0-24 (µg*h/L) | ||
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 (0.5–2) | 0.835 (90.8) | 4.89 (38.6) | 5.1 (65.3) |
| 2.0 | 7 | 2 (0.5–6) | 1.09 (64.4) | 8.39 (42.0) | 5.4 (31.9) |
| 3.5 | 6 | 1.5 (0.5–2) | 2.78 (82.4) | 15.6 (52.5) | 5.4 (15.2) |
| 5.0 | 9 | 1 (0.5–4) | 3.94 (30.0) | 24.5 (24.2) | 5.8 (27.1) |
| 7.0 | 19 | 1 (0.5–4) | 9.61 (69.7) | 39.4 (38.7) | 5.3 (23.8) |
| 10 | 7 | 1 (0.5–2) | 12.7 (36.3) | 51.0 (20.5) | 5.5 (14.2) |
| 12 | 5 | 2 (1–2) | 12.2 (37.4) | 64.7 (33.4) | 5.4 (17.3) |
| 14 | 10 | 1 (0.5–2) | 25.6 (63.9) | 108 (55.1) | 5.1 (21.8) |
| 20 | 8 | 0.75 (0.5–4) | 33.6 (49.2) | 142 (43.0) | 5.1 (10.3) |
| 30 | 4 | 1.25 (0.5–2) | 34.4 (44.7) | 159 (23.9) | 5.3 (10.2) |
| 40 | 6 | 0.5 (0.5–1) | 73.3 (85.8) | 265 (61.5) | 4.5 (17.2) |
Median (min–max) for Tmax and geometric mean (CV%) for other parameters.
Fig. 3Pre-treatment TMEM14C AJ/CJ ratio may predict the RBC TI of MDS subjects on H3B-8800 treatment.
A Box plots representing the relationship between pre-treatment TMEM14C AJ/CJ (NanoString) and RBC TI on study by tumor indication. Diagnosis of AML, MDS, or CMML is shown as per central assessment. B ROC curve analyses and ranking of MDS subjects with available pre-treatment TMEM14C AJ/CJ data. C TMEM14C AJ/CJ expression ratio post H3B-8800 treatment in MDS subjects with high pre-treatment TMEM14C AJ/CJ ratio. RBC TI red blood cell transfusion independence, MDS myelodysplastic syndromes.