Catherine R Lesko1, Heidi E Hutton2, Anthony T Fojo3, Nicola M Shen1, Richard D Moore3, Geetanjali Chander3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, and. 3. Department of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the risk of viral nonsuppression across the depression care cascade. DESIGN: A clinical cohort study. METHODS: We used depressive symptoms (PHQ-8 ≥ 10) self-reported on computer-assisted surveys, clinical diagnoses of depression in the medical record in the prior year and pharmacologic (any prescription for an antidepressant) and psychologic treatments for depression (attendance at at least two mental health visits in the prior year) to classify patients into groups: no history of depression; prior depression diagnosis; current indication for depression treatment (symptoms or clinical diagnosis); and treated depression (stratified by presence of persistent symptoms). We associated position in the depression care cascade with viral nonsuppression (>200 copies/ml) 7 days before to 6 months after the index self-report of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: History of depression [adjusted risk difference (aRD) relative to no history = 5.9%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-10.3] and current depression (symptoms or diagnosis) in the absence of treatment (aRD relative to no current depression or depression treatment = 4.8%, 95% CI: 1.8-7.8) were associated with a higher risk of viral nonsuppression than no history of depression. Depression treatment mitigated this association (aRD = -0.4%, 95% CI: -2.5 to 1.7). CONCLUSION: The relationship between depression care cascade and viral suppression is complex. Untreated depression and clinically unrecognized depressive symptoms were both related to viral nonsuppression. Treated depression was not associated with viral nonsuppression; however, a high proportion of treated patients still had depressive symptoms. Depression treatment should be titrated if patients' symptoms are not responsive and patients with a history of depression should be monitored for ART adherence.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the risk of viral nonsuppression across the depression care cascade. DESIGN: A clinical cohort study. METHODS: We used depressive symptoms (PHQ-8 ≥ 10) self-reported on computer-assisted surveys, clinical diagnoses of depression in the medical record in the prior year and pharmacologic (any prescription for an antidepressant) and psychologic treatments for depression (attendance at at least two mental health visits in the prior year) to classify patients into groups: no history of depression; prior depression diagnosis; current indication for depression treatment (symptoms or clinical diagnosis); and treated depression (stratified by presence of persistent symptoms). We associated position in the depression care cascade with viral nonsuppression (>200 copies/ml) 7 days before to 6 months after the index self-report of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: History of depression [adjusted risk difference (aRD) relative to no history = 5.9%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-10.3] and current depression (symptoms or diagnosis) in the absence of treatment (aRD relative to no current depression or depression treatment = 4.8%, 95% CI: 1.8-7.8) were associated with a higher risk of viral nonsuppression than no history of depression. Depression treatment mitigated this association (aRD = -0.4%, 95% CI: -2.5 to 1.7). CONCLUSION: The relationship between depression care cascade and viral suppression is complex. Untreated depression and clinically unrecognized depressive symptoms were both related to viral nonsuppression. Treated depression was not associated with viral nonsuppression; however, a high proportion of treated patients still had depressive symptoms. Depression treatment should be titrated if patients' symptoms are not responsive and patients with a history of depression should be monitored for ART adherence.
Authors: Myron S Cohen; Ying Q Chen; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; Mina C Hosseinipour; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; James G Hakim; Johnstone Kumwenda; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Jose H S Pilotto; Sheela V Godbole; Sanjay Mehendale; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Breno R Santos; Kenneth H Mayer; Irving F Hoffman; Susan H Eshleman; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Lei Wang; Joseph Makhema; Lisa A Mills; Guy de Bruyn; Ian Sanne; Joseph Eron; Joel Gallant; Diane Havlir; Susan Swindells; Heather Ribaudo; Vanessa Elharrar; David Burns; Taha E Taha; Karin Nielsen-Saines; David Celentano; Max Essex; Thomas R Fleming Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robin M Nance; J A Chris Delaney; Jane M Simoni; Ira B Wilson; Kenneth H Mayer; Bridget M Whitney; Frances M Aunon; Steven A Safren; Michael J Mugavero; W Christopher Mathews; Katerina A Christopoulos; Joseph J Eron; Sonia Napravnik; Richard D Moore; Benigno Rodriguez; Bryan Lau; Rob J Fredericksen; Michael S Saag; Mari M Kitahata; Heidi M Crane Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rushina Cholera; Brian W Pence; Angela M Bengtson; Heidi M Crane; Katerina Christopoulos; Steven R Cole; Rob Fredericksen; Bradley N Gaynes; Amy Heine; W Christopher Mathews; Matthew J Mimiaga; Richard Moore; Sonia Napravnik; Conall O'Clerigh; Steven Safren; Michael J Mugavero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zihao Li; David W Purcell; Stephanie L Sansom; Demorah Hayes; H Irene Hall Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 17.586