Literature DB >> 19000070

Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.

Vivianne H M Visschers1, Ree M Meertens, Wim W F Passchier, Nanne N K de Vries.   

Abstract

Communicating probability information about risks to the public is more difficult than might be expected. Many studies have examined this subject, so that their resulting recommendations are scattered over various publications, diverse research fields, and are about different presentation formats. An integration of empirical findings in one review would be useful therefore to describe the evidence base for communication about probability information and to present the recommendations that can be made so far. We categorized the studies in the following presentation formats: frequencies, percentages, base rates and proportions, absolute and relative risk reduction, cumulative probabilities, verbal probability information, numerical versus verbal probability information, graphs, and risk ladders. We suggest several recommendations for these formats. Based on the results of our review, we show that the effects of presentation format depend not only on the type of format, but also on the context in which the format is used. We therefore argue that the presentation format has the strongest effect when the receiver processes probability information heuristically instead of systematically. We conclude that future research and risk communication practitioners should not only concentrate on the presentation format of the probability information but also on the situation in which this message is presented, as this may predict how people process the information and how this may influence their interpretation of the risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000070     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  50 in total

1.  Information related to prenatal genetic counseling: interpretation by adolescents, effects on risk perception and ethical implications.

Authors:  Philippe A Melas; Susanne Georgsson Öhman; Niklas Juth; The-Hung Bui
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Medical decision making and the importance of baseline risk.

Authors:  Steven D Stovitz; Ian Shrier
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Unresolved issues in risk communication research: the case of the H1N1 pandemic (2009-2011).

Authors:  Clara Barrelet; Mathilde Bourrier; Claudine Burton-Jeangros; Mélinée Schindler
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Comprehension of the description of side effects in drug information leaflets: a survey of doctors, pharmacists and lawyers.

Authors:  Andreas Ziegler; Anka Hadlak; Steffi Mehlbeer; Inke R König
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Effect of Communication Style on Perceptions of Medication Side Effect Risk among Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Ruta V Sawant; Collin R Beatty; Sujit S Sansgiry
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Communicating Risk Information in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Television Ads: A Content Analysis.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin; Jon Poehlman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-11-10

Review 8.  Pre-exposure prophylaxis state of the science: empirical analogies for research and implementation.

Authors:  Sarit A Golub; Don Operario; Pamina M Gorbach
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Association of injection drug use with incidence of HIV-associated non-AIDS-related morbidity by age, 1995-2014.

Authors:  Catherine R Lesko; Richard D Moore; Weiqun Tong; Bryan Lau
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.