Diana Penha1,2, Erique Pinto3, Bruno Hochhegger4, Colin Monaghan5, Edson Marchiori6,7, Luís Taborda-Barata3, Klaus Irion8. 1. Universidade da Beira Interior Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Covilha, Portugal. dianapenha@gmail.com. 2. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. dianapenha@gmail.com. 3. Universidade da Beira Interior Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Covilha, Portugal. 4. Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 5. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK. 6. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Faculdade de Medicina, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 7. Universidade Federal Fluminense Faculdade de Medicina, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. 8. Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent recommendations for lung nodule management include volumetric analysis using tools that present intrinsic measurement variability, with possible impacts on clinical decisions and patient safety. This study was conducted to evaluate whether changes in the attenuation of the lung parenchyma adjacent to a nodule affect the performance of nodule segmentation using computed tomography (CT) studies and volumetric tools. METHODS: Two radiologists retrospectively applied two commercially available volumetric tools for the assessment of lung nodules with diameters of 5-8 mm detected by low-dose chest CT during a lung cancer screening program. The radiologists recorded the success and adequacy of nodule segmentation, nodule volume, manually and automatically (or semi-automatically) obtained long- and short-axis measurements, mean attenuation of adjacent lung parenchyma, and presence of interstitial lung abnormalities or disease, emphysema, pleural plaques, and linear atelectasis. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of good nodule segmentation using the volumetric tools. Interobserver and intersoftware agreement on good nodule segmentation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: In total, data on 1265 nodules (mean patient age, 68.3 ± 5.1 years; 70.2% male) were included in the study. In the regression model, attenuation of the adjacent lung parenchyma was highly significant (odds ratio 0.987, p < 0.001), with a large effect size. Interobserver and intersoftware agreement on good segmentation was good, although one software package performed better and measurements differed consistently between software packages. CONCLUSION: For lung nodules with diameters of 5-8 mm, the likelihood of good segmentation declines with increasing attenuation of the adjacent parenchyma.
BACKGROUND: Recent recommendations for lung nodule management include volumetric analysis using tools that present intrinsic measurement variability, with possible impacts on clinical decisions and patient safety. This study was conducted to evaluate whether changes in the attenuation of the lung parenchyma adjacent to a nodule affect the performance of nodule segmentation using computed tomography (CT) studies and volumetric tools. METHODS: Two radiologists retrospectively applied two commercially available volumetric tools for the assessment of lung nodules with diameters of 5-8 mm detected by low-dose chest CT during a lung cancer screening program. The radiologists recorded the success and adequacy of nodule segmentation, nodule volume, manually and automatically (or semi-automatically) obtained long- and short-axis measurements, mean attenuation of adjacent lung parenchyma, and presence of interstitial lung abnormalities or disease, emphysema, pleural plaques, and linear atelectasis. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of good nodule segmentation using the volumetric tools. Interobserver and intersoftware agreement on good nodule segmentation was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: In total, data on 1265 nodules (mean patient age, 68.3 ± 5.1 years; 70.2% male) were included in the study. In the regression model, attenuation of the adjacent lung parenchyma was highly significant (odds ratio 0.987, p < 0.001), with a large effect size. Interobserver and intersoftware agreement on good segmentation was good, although one software package performed better and measurements differed consistently between software packages. CONCLUSION: For lung nodules with diameters of 5-8 mm, the likelihood of good segmentation declines with increasing attenuation of the adjacent parenchyma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Interstitial lung disease; Lung cancer screening; Segmentation; Volumetry
Authors: Paul J Nietert; James G Ravenel; William M Leue; James V Miller; Katherine K Taylor; Elizabeth S Garrett-Mayer; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: James G Ravenel; William M Leue; Paul J Nietert; James V Miller; Katherine K Taylor; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Colin Jacobs; Eva M van Rikxoort; Ernst Th Scholten; Pim A de Jong; Mathias Prokop; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Bram van Ginneken Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Heber MacMahon; David P Naidich; Jin Mo Goo; Kyung Soo Lee; Ann N C Leung; John R Mayo; Atul C Mehta; Yoshiharu Ohno; Charles A Powell; Mathias Prokop; Geoffrey D Rubin; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; William D Travis; Paul E Van Schil; Alexander A Bankier Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Rob J van Klaveren; Matthijs Oudkerk; Mathias Prokop; Ernst T Scholten; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Rene Vernhout; Carola A van Iersel; Karien A M van den Bergh; Susan van 't Westeinde; Carlijn van der Aalst; Erik Thunnissen; Dong Ming Xu; Ying Wang; Yingru Zhao; Hester A Gietema; Bart-Jan de Hoop; Harry J M Groen; Geertruida H de Bock; Peter van Ooijen; Carla Weenink; Johny Verschakelen; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Wim Timens; Dik Willebrand; Aryan Vink; Willem Mali; Harry J de Koning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J K Field; S W Duffy; D R Baldwin; D K Whynes; A Devaraj; K E Brain; T Eisen; J Gosney; B A Green; J A Holemans; T Kavanagh; K M Kerr; M Ledson; K J Lifford; F E McRonald; A Nair; R D Page; M K B Parmar; D M Rassl; R C Rintoul; N J Screaton; N J Wald; D Weller; P R Williamson; G Yadegarfar; D M Hansell Journal: Thorax Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Thomas Sartoretti; Damien Racine; Victor Mergen; Lisa Jungblut; Pascal Monnin; Thomas G Flohr; Katharina Martini; Thomas Frauenfelder; Hatem Alkadhi; André Euler Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-02-18