Literature DB >> 19141526

Imprecision in automated volume measurements of pulmonary nodules and its effect on the level of uncertainty in volume doubling time estimation.

Paul J Nietert1, James G Ravenel2, William M Leue3, James V Miller3, Katherine K Taylor4, Elizabeth S Garrett-Mayer5, Gerard A Silvestri4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection of small indeterminate pulmonary nodules (4 to 10 mm in diameter) in clinical practice is increasing, largely because of increased utilization and improved imaging technology. Although there currently exists software for CT scan machines that automate nodule volume estimation, the imprecision associated with volume estimates is particularly poor for nodules < or = 6 mm in diameter, with greater imprecision associated with increasing CT scan slice thickness. This study examined the effects of the volume estimation error associated with four CT scan slice thicknesses (0.625, 1.25, 2.50, and 5.00 mm) on estimates of volume doubling time (VDT) for solid nodules of various sizes.
METHODS: Data reflecting the accuracy of 1,624 automated volume estimations were obtained from experiments incorporating volume estimation software, performed on a commercially available lung phantom. These data informed mathematical simulations that were used to estimate imprecision around VDT estimates for hypothetical pairs of volume estimates for a given solid pulmonary nodule observed at different time points.
RESULTS: The confidence intervals around the VDT estimates were extremely wide for 2.50- and 5.00-mm slice thicknesses, often encompassing values traditionally associated with both benignity and malignity for simulated 1- and 2-mm growths in diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: Because of the inaccuracy in automated volume estimation, the confidence a clinician should have in estimating VDT should be highly dependent on the degree of observed growth and on the CT scan slice thickness. The performance of CT scanners with slice thicknesses of > or = 2.5 mm for assessing growth in pulmonary nodules is essentially inadequate for 1-mm changes in nodule diameter.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19141526      PMCID: PMC5989730          DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-2040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  25 in total

1.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; A P Reeves; W J Kostis; B Zhao; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Small pulmonary nodules: volume measurement at chest CT--phantom study.

Authors:  Jane P Ko; Henry Rusinek; Erika L Jacobs; James S Babb; Margrit Betke; Georgeann McGuinness; David P Naidich
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility.

Authors:  Dag Wormanns; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst Klotz; Anke Marheine; Florian Beyer; Walter Heindel; Stefan Diederich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Effect of blood vessels on measurement of nodule volume in a chest phantom.

Authors:  Jane P Ko; Rachel Marcus; Elan Bomsztyk; James S Babb; Cornel Stefanescu; Manmeen Kaur; David P Naidich; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.

Authors:  Myria Petrou; Leslie E Quint; Bin Nan; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lindell; Thomas E Hartman; Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Henry D Tazelaar; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  3-D segmentation algorithm of small lung nodules in spiral CT images.

Authors:  S Diciotti; G Picozzi; M Falchini; M Mascalchi; N Villari; G Valli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2008-01

9.  Pulmonary metastases: effect of CT section thickness on measurement--initial experience.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Chaya S Moskowitz; Liang Wang; Michelle S Ginsberg; Cathleen A Cooper; Li Jiang; John P Kalaigian
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Pulmonary metastases tumor doubling time: assessment by computed tomography.

Authors:  Rubens Chojniak; Riad N Younes
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  11 in total

1.  Application of CT-PSF-based computer-simulated lung nodules for evaluating the accuracy of computer-aided volumetry.

Authors:  Ayumu Funaki; Masaki Ohkubo; Shinichi Wada; Kohei Murao; Toru Matsumoto; Shinji Niizuma
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-03-25

2.  Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals.

Authors:  Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Matthijs Oudkerk; Geertruida H de Bock; Harry J de Koning; Xueqian Xie; Peter M A van Ooijen; Marcel J W Greuter; Pim A de Jong; Harry J M Groen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Quality assurance and quantitative imaging biomarkers in low-dose CT lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Chara E Rydzak; Samuel G Armato; Ricardo S Avila; James L Mulshine; David F Yankelevitz; David S Gierada
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Inter-Method Performance Study of Tumor Volumetry Assessment on Computed Tomography Test-Retest Data.

Authors:  Andrew J Buckler; Jovanna Danagoulian; Kjell Johnson; Adele Peskin; Marios A Gavrielides; Nicholas Petrick; Nancy A Obuchowski; Hubert Beaumont; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Rudresh Jarecha; Jan-Martin Kuhnigk; Ninad Mantri; Michael McNitt-Gray; Jan H Moltz; Gergely Nyiri; Sam Peterson; Pierre Tervé; Christian Tietjen; Etienne von Lavante; Xiaonan Ma; Samantha St Pierre; Maria Athelogou
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Clinical impact of the tumor volume doubling time on sarcoma patients with lung metastases.

Authors:  Tomoki Nakamura; Akihiko Matsumine; Takao Matsubara; Kunihiro Asanuma; Astumasa Uchida; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Pulmonary Nodules: growth rate assessment in patients by using serial CT and three-dimensional volumetry.

Authors:  Jane P Ko; Erika J Berman; Manmeen Kaur; James S Babb; Elan Bomsztyk; Alissa K Greenberg; David P Naidich; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Michael K Gould; Jessica Donington; William R Lynch; Peter J Mazzone; David E Midthun; David P Naidich; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Reproducibility of Volumetric Computed Tomography of Stable Small Pulmonary Nodules with Implications on Estimated Growth Rate and Optimal Scan Interval.

Authors:  Gary T Smith; Ahmad R Rahman; Ming Li; Brandon Moore; Hester Gietema; Giulia Veronesi; Pierre P Massion; Ronald C Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The impact of lung parenchyma attenuation on nodule volumetry in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Diana Penha; Erique Pinto; Bruno Hochhegger; Colin Monaghan; Edson Marchiori; Luís Taborda-Barata; Klaus Irion
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 10.  Low-dose CT: technique, reading methods and image interpretation.

Authors:  Cristiano Rampinelli; Daniela Origgi; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.