Literature DB >> 34169538

A signal detection model for quantifying overregularization in nonlinear image reconstruction.

Emil Y Sidky1, John Paul Phillips1, Weimin Zhou2, Greg Ongie3, Juan P Cruz-Bastida1, Ingrid S Reiser1, Mark A Anastasio2, Xiaochuan Pan1.   

Abstract

Many useful image quality metrics for evaluating linear image reconstruction techniques do not apply to or are difficult to interpret for nonlinear image reconstruction. The vast majority of metrics employed for evaluating nonlinear image reconstruction are based on some form of global image fidelity, such as image root mean square error (RMSE). Use of such metrics can lead to overregularization in the sense that they can favor removal of subtle details in the image. To address this shortcoming, we develop an image quality metric based on signal detection that serves as a surrogate to the qualitative loss of fine image details. The metric is demonstrated in the context of a breast CT simulation, where different equal-dose configurations are considered. The configurations differ in the number of projections acquired. Image reconstruction is performed with a nonlinear algorithm based on total variation constrained least-squares (TV-LSQ). The resulting images are studied as a function of three parameters: number of views acquired, total variation constraint value, and number of iterations. The images are evaluated visually, with image RMSE, and with the proposed signal-detection-based metric. The latter uses a small signal, and computes detectability in the sinogram and in the reconstructed image. Loss of signal detectability through the image reconstruction process is taken as a quantitative measure of loss of fine details in the image. Loss of signal detectability is seen to correlate well with the blocky or patchy appearance due to overregularization with TV-LSQ, and this trend runs counter to the image RMSE metric, which tends to favor the over-regularized images. The proposed signal detection-based metric provides an image quality assessment that is complimentary to that of image RMSE. Using the two metrics in concert may yield a useful prescription for determining CT algorithm and configuration parameters when nonlinear image reconstruction is used.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT image quality; image reconstruction; model observers; total-variation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34169538      PMCID: PMC8697366          DOI: 10.1002/mp.14703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.506


  26 in total

1.  Statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  Idris A Elbakri; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer.

Authors:  Brandon D Gallas; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.

Authors:  John M Boone; Alexander L C Kwan; J Anthony Seibert; Nikula Shah; Karen K Lindfors; Thomas R Nelson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Task-based image quality evaluation of iterative reconstruction methods for low dose CT using computer simulations.

Authors:  Jingyan Xu; Matthew K Fuld; George S K Fung; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  CNN-Based Projected Gradient Descent for Consistent CT Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Harshit Gupta; Kyong Hwan Jin; Ha Q Nguyen; Michael T McCann; Michael Unser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Comparison of human and Hotelling observer performance for a fan-beam CT signal detection task.

Authors:  Adrian A Sanchez; Emil Y Sidky; Ingrid Reiser; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Sparse-view x-ray CT reconstruction via total generalized variation regularization.

Authors:  Shanzhou Niu; Yang Gao; Zhaoying Bian; Jing Huang; Wufan Chen; Gaohang Yu; Zhengrong Liang; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.

Authors:  C K Abbey; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  A Spectral CT Method to Directly Estimate Basis Material Maps From Experimental Photon-Counting Data.

Authors:  Taly Gilat Schmidt; Rina Foygel Barber; Emil Y Sidky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization.

Authors:  Emil Y Sidky; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Addressing CT metal artifacts using photon-counting detectors and one-step spectral CT image reconstruction.

Authors:  Taly Gilat Schmidt; Barbara A Sammut; Rina Foygel Barber; Xiaochuan Pan; Emil Y Sidky
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.