Literature DB >> 16475776

Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.

John M Boone1, Alexander L C Kwan, J Anthony Seibert, Nikula Shah, Karen K Lindfors, Thomas R Nelson.   

Abstract

The use of breast computed tomography (CT) as an alternative to mammography in some patients is being studied at several institutions. However, the radiation dosimetry issues associated with breast CT are markedly different than in the case of mammography. In this study, the spectral properties of an operational breast CT scanner were characterized both by physical measurement and computer modeling of the kVp-dependent spectra, from 40 to 110 kVp (Be window W anode with 0.30 mm added Cu filtration). Previously reported conversion factors, normalized glandular dose for CT-DgN(ct), derived from Monte Carlo methods, were used in concert with the output spectra of the breast scanner to compute the mean glandular dose to the breast based upon different combinations of x-ray technique factors (kVp and mAs). The mean glandular dose (MGD) was measured as a function of the compressed breast thickness (2-8 cm) and three different breast compositions (0%, 50%, and 100% glandular fractions) in four clinical mammography systems in our institution. The average MGD from these four systems was used to compute the technique factors for breast CT systems that would match the two-view mammographic dose levels. For a 14 cm diameter breast (equivalent to a 5 cm thick compressed breast in mammography), air kerma levels at the breast CT scanner's isocenter (468 mm from the source) of 4.4, 6.4, and 9.0 mGy were found to deliver equivalent mammography doses for 0%, 50%, and 100% glandular breasts (respectively) at 80 kVp. At 80 kVp (where air kerma was 11.3 mGy/100 mAs at the isocenter), 57 mAs (integrated over the entire scan) was required to match the mammography dose for a 14 cm 50% glandular breast. At 50 kVp, 360 mAs is required to match mammographic dose levels. Tables are provided for both air kerma at the isocenter and mAs for 0%, 50%, and 100% glandular breasts. Other issues that impact breast CT technique factors are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16475776     DOI: 10.1118/1.2128126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  46 in total

1.  The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.

Authors:  Christina M Shafer; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Steve Si Jia Feng; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; Karen K Lindfors; Shonket Ray; Shih-Ying Huang; Laurel A Beckett; Wayne L Monsky; John M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Quantification of breast density with spectral mammography based on a scanned multi-slit photon-counting detector: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Huanjun Ding; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Investigation of x-ray spectra for iodinated contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick; Andrey Makeev
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-26

Review 6.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Yiannis Kyriakou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Computer modeling of the spatial resolution properties of a dedicated breast CT system.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  An X-Ray computed tomography/positron emission tomography system designed specifically for breast imaging.

Authors:  John M Boone; Kai Yang; George W Burkett; Nathan J Packard; Shih-ying Huang; Spencer Bowen; Ramsey D Badawi; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.