Literature DB >> 2072069

Practice of breast self examination: disease extent at diagnosis and patterns of surgical care. A report from an Italian study. GIVIO (Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation).

.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine whether breast self examination leads to earlier diagnosis and whether this translates into a larger utilisation of conservative surgical procedures.
DESIGN: The study was a survey of a cohort of breast cancer patients diagnosed over the period September 1986-July 1988.
SUBJECTS: Participants were 1315 women enrolled in a clinical trial testing the effectiveness of two follow up regimens by 30 general hospitals throughout Italy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 511 patients (39%) reported some breast self examination practice, but only 109 (8%) did this regularly and in a way deemed correct by their physicians. Breast self examination practice was positively associated with patients' education and past history of benign breast disease and negatively with age. Self examiners were found to have a significantly greater chance of being diagnosed with a primary tumour coded as pT1 according to the 1982 TNM classification (odds ratio = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.13-1.79). This protective effect was mostly evident in the subgroup of optimal performers (odds ratio = 1.54, CI = 1.01-2.34). Nearly half the patients (319/655) eligible for conservative surgery still had an unnecessary radical procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Premorbid breast self examination seems to have a modest effect on the extent of disease at diagnosis. The still widespread use of radical surgery suggests that a careful reanalysis of priorities among possible public interventions is needed before launching massive educational campaigns targeted exclusively at consumers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2072069      PMCID: PMC1060727          DOI: 10.1136/jech.45.2.112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  28 in total

1.  Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study.

Authors:  H J Collette; N E Day; J J Rombach; F de Waard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1985-05

3.  Self-examination of the breast: use and effectiveness.

Authors:  W L Owen; A G Hoge; N R Asal; P L Anderson; A J Cucchiara
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Breast self-examination practices and breast cancer survival.

Authors:  R S Foster; M C Costanza
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Clinical measures to assess the practice and efficiency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; R Margolese; R Poisson; Y Pilch; C Redmond; E Fisher; N Wolmark; M Deutsch; E Montague
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Breast self-examination among diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  S E Taylor; R R Lichtman; J V Wood; A Z Bluming; G M Dosik; R L Leibowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The effects of breast self-examination in a population-based cancer registry. A report of differences in extent of disease.

Authors:  E M Smith; T L Burns
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast self examination and breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  D Mant; M P Vessey; A Neil; K McPherson; L Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: should women be routinely taught breast self-examination to screen for breast cancer?

Authors:  N Baxter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Breast self-examination and survival from breast cancer: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  A Auvinen; L Elovainio; M Hakama
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Can breast self-examination continue to be touted justifiably as an optional practice?

Authors:  T T Fancher; J A Palesty; J J Paszkowiak; R P Kiran; A D Malkan; S J Dudrick
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-06

4.  Breast Self-Examination - the case for a second look.

Authors:  Eric Dietze; Veronica Jones; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-02-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.