Literature DB >> 6146875

Does a booklet on breast self-examination improve subsequent detection rates?

J Turner, R Blaney, D Roy, W Odling-Smee, G Irwin, G Mackenzie.   

Abstract

Of 28 788 women aged 40 to 74 registered at 28 university teaching practices in greater Belfast, half were randomly selected to receive a booklet on breast self-examination from their general practitioner at the start of the study and 1 year later. The frequency of breast abnormalities was identical in both groups (0.83%) during the 2-year follow-up. Early malignant breast cancers (stages TX, TO, Tla) were significantly more frequent in the intervention group (53.6%) than in the control group (24.3%). Among women in the intervention group with malignant lesions, 2 sites, left nipple and left inner/upper quadrant, were significantly less frequently involved. These findings in relation to staging and site were confirmed by multivariate comparisons. The intervention group also had a smaller average tumour size (24.0 mm compared with 32.6 mm) due to significantly smaller benign tumours and the absence of the relationship between delay and tumour size evident in the control group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6146875     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92699-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  7 in total

1.  Edinburgh breast education campaign on breast cancer and breast self-examination: was it worth while?

Authors:  M M Roberts; S E Robinson; K French; A Proudfoot; H Talbot; R A Elton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Review of general surgery 1984-85.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Randomisation by cluster and the problem of social class bias.

Authors:  F Alexander; M M Roberts; W Lutz; W Hepburn
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Self examination of the breast: is it beneficial? Meta-analysis of studies investigating breast self examination and extent of disease in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  D Hill; V White; D Jolley; K Mapperson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-07-23

Review 5.  Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Kösters; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

6.  Breast self-examination programmes in the trial of early detection of breast cancer: ten year findings.

Authors:  R Ellman; S M Moss; D Coleman; J Chamberlain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Breast self examination and breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  D Mant; M P Vessey; A Neil; K McPherson; L Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.