| Literature DB >> 34156474 |
Rob Driessen1,2, Dorien Kiers3, Casper Schalkwijk4,5, Jean Scheijen4,5, Jelle Gerretsen3, Peter Pickkers3, Marcel van de Poll1,6,7, Iwan van der Horst1,5, Dennis Bergmans1,6, Matthijs Kox3, Bas van Bussel1,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypoxia and inflammation are hallmarks of critical illness, related to multiple organ failure. A possible mechanism leading to multiple organ failure is hypoxia- or inflammation-induced down-regulation of the detoxifying glyoxalase system that clears dicarbonyl stress. The dicarbonyl methylglyoxal (MGO) is a highly reactive agent produced by metabolic pathways such as anaerobic glycolysis and gluconeogenesis. MGO leads to protein damage and ultimately multi-organ failure. Whether detoxification of MGO into D-lactate by glyoxalase functions appropriately under conditions of hypoxia and inflammation is largely unknown. We investigated the effect of inflammation and hypoxia on the MGO pathway in humans in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: dicarbonyl; glyoxalase; hypoxia; inflammation; methylglyoxal; sepsis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34156474 PMCID: PMC8411911 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20210954
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
Figure 1Overview of the human endotoxemia and hypoxia model procedures
First, venous and arterial cannula were placed. Subsequently, prehydration with 1.5 L glucose 2.5% infusion (light blue line) was started. After 1 h, prehydration was ceased, and maintenance fluid infusion of the same solution of 150 ml/h was commenced. Application of a non-invasive helmet for 210 min (blue arrows) to induce hypoxia or normoxia (indicated by the blue square) was initiated after 30 min. One hour after the start of prehydration and application of the helmet, 2 ng/kg LPS was administered intravenously (red arrow). Blood samples were drawn at ten time points from 0 until 570 min, and an additional blood sample was drawn after 24 h (1440 min).
Baseline characteristics of 40 healthy male participants
| Experimental conditions | Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxia ( | LPS ( | LPS+hypoxia ( | ( | ||
| Age, years | 21 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 21 ± 2 | 22 ± 2 | 0.598 |
| Height, cm | 183 ± 5 | 185 ± 8 | 184 ± 7 | 184 ± 7 | 0.976 |
| Weight, kg | 78 ± 11 | 77 ± 10 | 77 ± 9 | 77 ± 12 | 0.999 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23 ± 3 | 22 ± 2 | 23 ± 3 | 23 ± 3 | 0.970 |
| Body surface area, m2 | 2 ± 0.2 | 2 ± 0.2 | 2 ± 0.1 | 2 ± 0.2 | 0.999 |
Data are means ± standard deviation; P-values by one-way ANOVA
LPS, lipopolysaccharide
Inflammatory parameters in the 40 male participants
| Experimental conditions | Control | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxia baseline
( | Hypoxia peak ( | LPS baseline ( | LPS peak ( | LPS+hypoxia baseline
( | LPS+hypoxia peak
( | Baseline ( | Peak ( | |
| Leukocytes, ×109/l | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 7.8 ± 1.4 | 4.9 ±1.1 | 11.0 ± 1.9 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 14.5 ± 1.6 | 6.2 ± 1.6 | 6.2 ± 1.3 |
| Body temperature, °C | 36.4 ± 0.3 | 36.6 ± 0.4 | 36.6 ± 0.3 | 37.9 ± 0.6 | 36.8 ± 0.3 | 38.3 ± 0.6 | 36.7 ± 0.4 | 37.0 ± 0.4 |
| Plasma TNF-α, pg/mL | 5.5 ± 2.9 | 5.0 ± 2.7 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 284.6 ± 135.1 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 195.5 ± 77.0 | 4.6 ± 1.9 | 4.1 ± 1.7 |
| Plasma IL-6, pg/ml | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 478.6 ± 241.3 | 3.2 ± 0.0 | 292.3 ± 156.4 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.1 |
Data are means ± standard deviation.
LPS, lipopolysaccharide
Peak was measured at 360, 180, 90 and 120 min post-LPS administration for leukocytes, body temperature, TNF-α and IL-6, respectively.
Figure 2Glyoxalase-1 mRNA expression in the hypoxia (HYP, orange line), LPS (grey line), and LPS+hypoxia (LPS+HYP, blue line) groups during the experiment, depicted as means + standard error of the mean
After adjustment for age and BMI, GLO1 expression decreased in the LPS (β (95%CI); -0.87 (-1.24; -0.50)) and LPS+hypoxia (-0.78 (-1.07; -0.48)) groups, compared with the hypoxia group (P<0.001), calculated using generalized estimating equations.
Figure 3Methylglyoxal (MGO) concentrations for the hypoxia (orange line), LPS (grey line), combined LPS and hypoxia (blue line), and control (black line) groups during the experiment depicted as means + standard error of the mean
No between-group differences were found using generalized estimating equations.
Figure 4Concentrations of L- and D-lactate and MG-H1 for the different conditions and the control group. A: Panel A: L-lactate, B: Panel B: D-lactate, C: Panel C: MG-H1
L- (panel A) and D-lactate (panel B), and MG-H1 (panel C) concentrations in the hypoxia (orange boxes), LPS (grey boxes), combined LPS and hypoxia (blue boxes), and the control group (black boxes) at 0 and 450 min. Results are reported as means + standard error of the mean (SEM). Student’s t-test was used for determining P-values.