BACKGROUND: The reactive α-oxoaldehydes glyoxal (GO), methylglyoxal (MGO) and 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG) have been linked to diabetic complications and other age-related diseases. Numerous techniques have been described for the quantification of α-oxoaldehydes in blood or plasma, although with several shortcomings such as the need of large sample volume, elaborate extraction steps or long run-times during analysis. Therefore, we developed and evaluated an improved method including sample preparation, for the quantification of these α-oxoaldehydes in blood and plasma with ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC MS/MS). METHODS: EDTA plasma and whole blood samples were deproteinized using perchloric acid (PCA) and subsequently derivatized with o-phenylenediamine (oPD). GO, MGO and 3-DG concentrations were determined using stable isotope dilution UPLC MS/MS with a run-to-run time of 8 min. Stability of α-oxoaldehyde concentrations in plasma and whole blood during storage was tested. The concentration of GO, MGO and 3-DG was measured in EDTA plasma of non-diabetic controls and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). RESULTS: Calibration curves of GO, MGO and 3-DG were linear throughout selected ranges. Recoveries of these α-oxoaldehydes were between 95% and 104%. Intra- and inter-assay CVs were between 2% and 14%. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain stable and reliable α-oxoaldehyde concentrations, immediate centrifugation of blood after blood sampling is essential and the use of EDTA as anticoagulant is preferable. Moreover, immediate precipitation of plasma protein with PCA stabilized α-oxoaldehyde concentrations for at least 120 min. With the use of the developed method, we found increased plasma concentrations of GO, MGO and 3-DG in T2DM as compared with non-diabetic controls.
BACKGROUND: The reactive α-oxoaldehydes glyoxal (GO), methylglyoxal (MGO) and 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG) have been linked to diabetic complications and other age-related diseases. Numerous techniques have been described for the quantification of α-oxoaldehydes in blood or plasma, although with several shortcomings such as the need of large sample volume, elaborate extraction steps or long run-times during analysis. Therefore, we developed and evaluated an improved method including sample preparation, for the quantification of these α-oxoaldehydes in blood and plasma with ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC MS/MS). METHODS:EDTA plasma and whole blood samples were deproteinized using perchloric acid (PCA) and subsequently derivatized with o-phenylenediamine (oPD). GO, MGO and 3-DG concentrations were determined using stable isotope dilution UPLC MS/MS with a run-to-run time of 8 min. Stability of α-oxoaldehyde concentrations in plasma and whole blood during storage was tested. The concentration of GO, MGO and 3-DG was measured in EDTA plasma of non-diabetic controls and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). RESULTS: Calibration curves of GO, MGO and 3-DG were linear throughout selected ranges. Recoveries of these α-oxoaldehydes were between 95% and 104%. Intra- and inter-assay CVs were between 2% and 14%. CONCLUSIONS: To obtain stable and reliable α-oxoaldehyde concentrations, immediate centrifugation of blood after blood sampling is essential and the use of EDTA as anticoagulant is preferable. Moreover, immediate precipitation of plasma protein with PCA stabilized α-oxoaldehyde concentrations for at least 120 min. With the use of the developed method, we found increased plasma concentrations of GO, MGO and 3-DG in T2DM as compared with non-diabetic controls.
Authors: Anna K Becker; Andrea Auditore; Monika Pischetsrieder; Karl Messlinger; Thomas Fleming; Peter W Reeh; Susanne K Sauer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Olaf Brouwers; Petra M G Niessen; Toshio Miyata; Jakob A Østergaard; Allan Flyvbjerg; Carine J Peutz-Kootstra; Jonas Sieber; Peter H Mundel; Michael Brownlee; Ben J A Janssen; Jo G R De Mey; Coen D A Stehouwer; Casper G Schalkwijk Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2013-10-26 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Sahar Hasim; Nur Ahmad Hussin; Fadhel Alomar; Keshore R Bidasee; Kenneth W Nickerson; Mark A Wilson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Olaf Brouwers; Joyce M J de Vos-Houben; Petra M G Niessen; Toshio Miyata; Frans van Nieuwenhoven; Ben J A Janssen; Geja Hageman; Coen D A Stehouwer; Casper G Schalkwijk Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Dionne E Maessen; Nordin M Hanssen; Mirjam A Lips; Jean L Scheijen; Ko Willems van Dijk; Hanno Pijl; Coen D Stehouwer; Casper G Schalkwijk Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Marie-Julie Nokin; Florence Durieux; Paul Peixoto; Barbara Chiavarina; Olivier Peulen; Arnaud Blomme; Andrei Turtoi; Brunella Costanza; Nicolas Smargiasso; Dominique Baiwir; Jean L Scheijen; Casper G Schalkwijk; Justine Leenders; Pascal De Tullio; Elettra Bianchi; Marc Thiry; Koji Uchida; David A Spiegel; James R Cochrane; Craig A Hutton; Edwin De Pauw; Philippe Delvenne; Dominique Belpomme; Vincent Castronovo; Akeila Bellahcène Journal: Elife Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 8.140