Literature DB >> 25806001

Warburg revisited: lessons for innate immunity and sepsis.

Anup Srivastava1, Praveen Mannam1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIF1a; Warburg effect; glycolysis; inflammation; mTOR; metabolism; oxidative phosphorylation; sepsis

Year:  2015        PMID: 25806001      PMCID: PMC4353299          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


× No keyword cloud information.
Warburg effect was first described as a mechanism by which the tumor cells rely on glycolysis to power proliferation and biosynthesis (Hsu and Sabatini, 2008). The transcription factor, hypoxia-inducible factor–1α (HIF-1α), and the serine/threonine protein kinase, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), are major drivers of this metabolic switch (Lu et al., 2002; Sun et al., 2011). In recent years a number of reports have shown that immune cells such as monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cell, and T cells utilize a similar mechanism during activation (Palsson-McDermott and O'Neill, 2013). It is known that activated monocytes/macrophages switch their core metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis (Rodríguez-Prados et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012). This process is similar to the Warburg effect in tumor cells because the activated immune cells need a readily available source of energy for phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and biosynthetic precursors to divide and produce cytokines. The mechanism of such metabolic switching remains unclear but a recent article by Cheng et al. sheds light on this crucial process (Cheng et al., 2014). They studied the mechanism by which monocytes acquire trained immunity (Figure 1). This is a process by which monocytes on initial stimulation undergo epigenetic programing by histone modification, leading to stronger gene transcription upon restimulation (Netea et al., 2011). Using a model of β-glucan exposure of macrophages and subsequent LPS stimulation they show that the macrophages undergo epigenetic upregulation of genes expressing mTOR and glycolysis, that are targets of the transcription factor HIF-1α. The β-glucan trained monocytes showed elevated aerobic glycolysis, reduced basal respiration rate and increased glucose consumption and lactate production. This was associated with a decrease in oxygen consumption and reduced mitochondrial capacity, consistent with a metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis. This process occurs through the activation of Akt-mTOR-HIF-1α pathway. Blocking of the mTOR-HIF-1α pathway by chemical inhibitors abrogated the trained immunity and indirect inhibition of mTOR by AICAR (an activator of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase, AMPK) had similar effects. Significantly, myeloid specific HIF1α deficient mice were not protected in a model of β-glucan induced tolerance against S. aureus sepsis, indicating that this pathway is important for septic responses.
Figure 1

Glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. In resting monocytes the metabolism is predominated by oxidative phosphorylation, providing a majority of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as the energy source. Activated monocytes during induction of trained immunity undergo a metabolic shift toward glycolysis, the Warburg effect, mediated by Akt-mTOR- HIF-1α.

Glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity. In resting monocytes the metabolism is predominated by oxidative phosphorylation, providing a majority of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as the energy source. Activated monocytes during induction of trained immunity undergo a metabolic shift toward glycolysis, the Warburg effect, mediated by Akt-mTOR- HIF-1α. This important study by Cheng et al. adds to a growing number of recent studies that have demonstrated that glycolytic flux and metabolic intermediates are drivers of immune responses. For example, macrophages exposed to LPS show a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis (Rodríguez-Prados et al., 2010); and succinate, an intermediate in the TCA cycle, induced Interleukin 1beta (IL-1β) production (Tannahill et al., 2013). In addition, Glucose transporter 1 (Glut1) mediated increase in glycolysis drives a proinflammatory phenotype in macrophages (Freemerman et al., 2014). The realization that oncogenesis and immune responses have a common underlying mechanism of metabolic switching indicates that this fundamental biological process can be a potential drug target for many diseases. An important clinical application of the concept of metabolic switching is in the identification of therapeutic targets in sepsis. Sepsis, a systemic inflammatory reaction to infection, is the leading cause of death in the world. The incidence of sepsis worldwide is 18 million every year with 30% mortality. The economic impact of sepsis is substantial with costs of up to $50,000/patient and $17 billion annually in United States alone (Slade et al., 2003; Moss, 2005). While in most cases we can control the infection with antibiotics, we lack therapies to minimize the hyperactive inflammatory response and downstream target injury (Lyle et al., 2014). Higher levels of lactate (product of glycolysis) and its slower rate of clearance during resuscitation predicts worse outcome in sepsis (Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2014). It is commonly thought that the lactate elevation is secondary to poor perfusion or microcirculatory disturbances, but it appears from recent studies that the lactate is more than just a marker of circulatory abnormalities and likely indicates a fundamental shift in metabolism to a more proinflammatory glycolysis. In line with this concept, a recent study has shown that pyruvate kinase M2- HIF-1α mediated Warburg effect drives mortality in sepsis (Yang et al., 2014). Our data on macrophages indicates that preservation of mitochondrial function under inflammatory conditions leads to attenuated cytokine responses (Srivastava et al., 2015). The mechanism by which metabolic switching regulates inflammatory processes is a novel and promising area of research. By targeting the upstream events in the inflammatory cascade we may get effective therapies for sepsis as well as for other inflammatory disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to the effective treatment of sepsis: antimicrobial agents, sepsis definitions, and host-directed therapies.

Authors:  Ngan H Lyle; Olga M Pena; John H Boyd; Robert E W Hancock
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  MKK3 mediates inflammatory response through modulation of mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Anup Srivastava; Amanda S Shinn; Patty J Lee; Praveen Mannam
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Mammalian target of rapamycin up-regulation of pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 is critical for aerobic glycolysis and tumor growth.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Xinxin Chen; Jianhui Ma; Haiyong Peng; Fang Wang; Xiaojun Zha; Yanan Wang; Yanling Jing; Hongwang Yang; Rongrong Chen; Long Chang; Yu Zhang; June Goto; Hiroaki Onda; Tong Chen; Ming-Rong Wang; Youyong Lu; Han You; David Kwiatkowski; Hongbing Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Substrate fate in activated macrophages: a comparison between innate, classic, and alternative activation.

Authors:  Juan-Carlos Rodríguez-Prados; Paqui G Través; Jimena Cuenca; Daniel Rico; Julián Aragonés; Paloma Martín-Sanz; Marta Cascante; Lisardo Boscá
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages: glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1)-mediated glucose metabolism drives a proinflammatory phenotype.

Authors:  Alex J Freemerman; Amy R Johnson; Gina N Sacks; J Justin Milner; Erin L Kirk; Melissa A Troester; Andrew N Macintyre; Pankuri Goraksha-Hicks; Jeffery C Rathmell; Liza Makowski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond.

Authors:  Peggy P Hsu; David M Sabatini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Fueling the flame: bioenergy couples metabolism and inflammation.

Authors:  Tie Fu Liu; Candice M Brown; Mohamed El Gazzar; Linda McPhail; Patrick Millet; Anuradha Rao; Vidula T Vachharajani; Barbara K Yoza; Charles E McCall
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.962

8.  mTOR- and HIF-1α-mediated aerobic glycolysis as metabolic basis for trained immunity.

Authors:  Shih-Chin Cheng; Jessica Quintin; Robert A Cramer; Kelly M Shepardson; Sadia Saeed; Vinod Kumar; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Joost H A Martens; Nagesha Appukudige Rao; Ali Aghajanirefah; Ganesh R Manjeri; Yang Li; Daniela C Ifrim; Rob J W Arts; Brian M J W van der Veer; Brian M J W van der Meer; Peter M T Deen; Colin Logie; Luke A O'Neill; Peter Willems; Frank L van de Veerdonk; Jos W M van der Meer; Aylwin Ng; Leo A B Joosten; Cisca Wijmenga; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Ramnik J Xavier; Mihai G Netea
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: raising awareness to reduce mortality.

Authors:  Elizabeth Slade; Pritpal S Tamber; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  PKM2 regulates the Warburg effect and promotes HMGB1 release in sepsis.

Authors:  Liangchun Yang; Min Xie; Minghua Yang; Yan Yu; Shan Zhu; Wen Hou; Rui Kang; Michael T Lotze; Timothy R Billiar; Haichao Wang; Lizhi Cao; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Cancer and the Circadian Clock.

Authors:  Ayesha A Shafi; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Understanding the significance of biological clock and its impact on cancer incidence.

Authors:  Shalie Malik; James Stokes Iii; Upender Manne; Rajesh Singh; Manoj K Mishra
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Mitochondrial and bioenergetic dysfunction in trauma-induced painful peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Tony K Y Lim; Malena B Rone; Seunghwan Lee; Jack P Antel; Ji Zhang
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.395

4.  Hypoxia and classical activation limits Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival by Akt-dependent glycolytic shift in macrophages.

Authors:  S K Matta; D Kumar
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2016-05-30

Review 5.  Increased Dicarbonyl Stress as a Novel Mechanism of Multi-Organ Failure in Critical Illness.

Authors:  Bas C T van Bussel; Marcel C G van de Poll; Casper G Schalkwijk; Dennis C J J Bergmans
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Sirtuins and Immuno-Metabolism of Sepsis.

Authors:  Xianfeng Wang; Nancy L Buechler; Alan G Woodruff; David L Long; Manal Zabalawi; Barbara K Yoza; Charles E McCall; Vidula Vachharajani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Clifford S Deutschman; Ricard Ferrer; Ishaq Lat; Flavia R Machado; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Mark E Nunnally; Massimo Antonelli; Laura E Evans; Judith Hellman; Sameer Jog; Jozef Kesecioglu; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Physical forces modulate cell differentiation and proliferation processes.

Authors:  Laurent Schwartz; Jorgelindo da Veiga Moreira; Mario Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 9.  Lactate and Immunosuppression in Sepsis.

Authors:  Benjamin Nolt; Fei Tu; Xiaohui Wang; Tuanzhu Ha; Randi Winter; David L Williams; Chuanfu Li
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Toward a Reasoned Classification of Diseases Using Physico-Chemical Based Phenotypes.

Authors:  Laurent Schwartz; Olivier Lafitte; Jorgelindo da Veiga Moreira
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.