| Literature DB >> 34154550 |
Joshua T Smith1, Elissa M Eckhardt2, Nicole B Hansel2, Tahmineh Rahmani Eliato3, Isabella W Martin4, Cheryl P Andam5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections due to Staphylococcus aureus cause significant patient morbidity and mortality worldwide. Of major concern is the emergence and spread of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in bloodstream infections, which are associated with therapeutic failure and increased mortality.Entities:
Keywords: Bloodstream infection; Genome evolution; Methicillin resistance; Multidrug resistance; Staphylococcus aureus
Year: 2021 PMID: 34154550 PMCID: PMC8215799 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06293-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Methicillin resistance and phylogenetic relationships of S. aureus isolates. a Yearly sampling of methicillin resistance based on either cefoxitin or oxacillin phenotypic screenings. b Yearly distribution of sequence types (ST) throughout the study period. Gray bars indicate STs either previously unknown or rare (< 3 individuals). c Midpoint-rooted maximum likelihood tree showing phylogenetic structure of 323 S. aureus isolates. Clade colors on the branches represent sequence clusters (SC) defined by the BAPS program. Inner ring shows the phenotypic results of methicillin resistance screening as described above. Outer ring shows the distribution of different STs
Fig. 2Antimicrobial resistance gene and class distribution among 323 isolates. a Gene presence-absence matrix showing the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes and SCCmec types across the phylogeny (tree is identical to that in Fig. 1c). Red blocks indicate presence of gene listed to the right of the panel. SCCmec types are color-coded as green = Type II, aqua = Type IV, blue = Type V. b Histogram showing distribution of the number of antimicrobial classes each genome is resistant to. c Bar chart showing the number of genomes resistant to each individual antimicrobial class.
Fig. 3Bayesian phylogeny and population dynamics of CC5 and CC8. Bayesian maximum clade credibility time-calibrated phylogeny of CC5 (a) and CC8 (b) based on non-recombining regions of the core genome. Divergence date (median estimate with 95% highest posterior density dates in brackets) is indicated in blue on the tree. Bayesian skygrowth plot showing changes in effective population size (Ne) over time of CC5 (c) and CC8 (d). Median is represented by a black line and 95% confidence intervals are in blue
Fig. 4Recombination parameters comparing CC5 and CC8. Core genome alignment of each CC was used as input in mcorr with 1000 bootstrapped replicates. d – diversity brought into the population by recombination and clonal diversity; θ – mutational divergence; ϕ – recombinational divergence; γ/μ relative rate of recombination to mutation (equivalent to ratio of ϕ/θ); f̅ – mean fragment size of a recombination event; c – recombination coverage. For all panels, brackets indicate results of Welch’s t-test of group comparisons; n.s. - not significant; *** - p < 0.0001