| Literature DB >> 34154543 |
Yang Song1,2, Miao Liu2, Wang-Ping Jia1,2, Ke Han1,2, Sheng-Shu Wang1, Yao He3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although there have been studies on the association between nutritional status and functional limitations, there were few studies on Asian centenarians in community. Therefore, this study aims to identify associations between nutritional status and functional limitations among centenarians in China.Entities:
Keywords: ADL; Centenarians; Functional limitations; MNA-SF; Malnutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34154543 PMCID: PMC8218470 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02312-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Distribution of baseline characteristics of centenarians in different nutritional status
| Characteristics | Total | Nutritional status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, M (IQR), years | 102.0(3.0) | 102.0(3.0) | 102.0(3.0) | 102.0(3.0) | 0.533 |
| Woman, % | 822(82.0) | 93(75.6) | 545(81.2) | 184(88.5) | 0.008 |
| Primary school and below, % | 982(98.2) | 7(5.7) | 11(1.6) | 2(1.0) | 0.006 |
| Living with families, % | 863(86.1) | 104(84.6) | 565(84.2) | 194(93.3) | 0.004 |
| Physical activity, % | 129(12.9) | 23(18.7) | 93(13.9) | 13(6.3) | 0.002 |
| BMI, M (IQR) | 17.9(16.0-19.9) | 21.8(20.3–23.8) | 17.8(15.9–19.5) | 17.1(16.0-18.4) | < 0.001 |
| Hb, M (IQR), g/L | 114.0(20.0) | 119.0(18.0) | 114.0(19.0) | 112.0(21.8) | < 0.001 |
| ALB, M (IQR), g/L | 4.6(1.2) | 4.8(1.2) | 4.6(1.1) | 4.5(1.3) | < 0.001 |
| TC, M (IQR), mmol/L | 38.5(5.1) | 40.2(3.7) | 38.6(4.9) | 37.4(6.2) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes, % | 96(9.6) | 13(10.6) | 63(9.4) | 20(9.6) | 0.920 |
| Hypertension, % | 757(75.5) | 99(80.5) | 501(74.7) | 157(75.5) | 0.385 |
| Heart disease, % | 41(4.1) | 5(4.1) | 26(3.9) | 10(4.8) | 0.839 |
a All p-values were significant at P < 0.05
Fig. 1Proportion of centenarians with BADL/IADL limitation under the different nutritional status
Fig. 2Functional status of centenarians according to nutritional status [n (%)]
Multivariable logistic regression analysis for the association between nutritional status and BADL limitation a, b
| Nutritional status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 2.952(1.506–5.787) | 22.277(10.978–45.208) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 2.864(1.448–5.664) | 20.955(10.169–43.179) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 2.388(1.190–4.792) | 16.770(7.972–35.280) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 2.390(1.189–4.804) | 17.060(8.093–35.964) | ˂0.001 |
| Man | ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 2.340(0.658–8.319) | 12.600(2.977–53.323) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 2.457(0.652–9.260) | 12.438(2.702–57.259) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 2.201(0.538–9.004) | 19.033(3.454-104.881) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 2.262(0.548–9.334) | 19.658(3.497–110.510) | ˂0.001 |
| Woman | ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 3.214(1.447–7.136) | 25.390(11.074–58.213) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 3.176(1.421–7.102) | 25.071(10.790-58.253) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 2.731(1.196–6.240) | 19.913(8.340-47.548) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 2.765(1.207–6.336) | 20.824(8.680–49.960) | ˂0.001 |
a Crude model: None adjusted; Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, educational level, residence types, physical activity; Model 2: Model 1 plus hemoglobin, serum albumin, total cholesterol; Model 3: Model 2 plus diabetes, hypertension, heart disease
b Described as OR (95 %CI)
Multivariable logistic regression analysis for the association between nutritional status and IADL limitation a
| Nutritional status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 2.265(1.531–3.351) | 15.411(8.436–28.153) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 2.221(1.457–3.385) | 13.298(7.069–25.019) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.919(1.247–2.952) | 10.880(5.700-20.769) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.908(1.236–2.945) | 11.221(5.853–21.511) | ˂0.001 |
| Man | ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 3.025(1.253–7.304) | 13.750(3.585–52.740) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 2.929(1.126–7.617) | 11.802(2.828–49.255) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 2.483(0.947–6.514) | 9.941(2.301–42.960) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 2.629(0.958–7.214) | 11.146(2.452–50.664) | ˂0.001 |
| Woman | ||||
| Crude model | 1 | 2.046(1.313–3.188) | 14.745(7.462–29.134) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1 | 2.099(1.308–3.368) | 13.986(6.856–28.534) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.828(1.124–2.972) | 11.308(5.457–23.432) | ˂0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.858(1.138–3.035) | 12.007(5.761–25.027) | ˂0.001 |
a The adjusted covariates in models are the same as in Table 2