OBJECTIVE: To validate a revision of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA(R)-SF) against the full MNA, a standard tool for nutritional evaluation. METHODS: A literature search identified studies that used the MNA for nutritional screening in geriatric patients. The contacted authors submitted original datasets that were merged into a single database. Various combinations of the questions on the current MNA-SF were tested using this database through combination analysis and ROC based derivation of classification thresholds. RESULTS: Twenty-seven datasets (n=6257 participants) were initially processed from which twelve were used in the current analysis on a sample of 2032 study participants (mean age 82.3y) with complete information on all MNA items. The original MNA-SF was a combination of six questions from the full MNA. A revised MNA-SF included calf circumference (CC) substituted for BMI performed equally well. A revised three-category scoring classification for this revised MNA-SF, using BMI and/or CC, had good sensitivity compared to the full MNA. CONCLUSION: The newly revised MNA-SF is a valid nutritional screening tool applicable to geriatric health care professionals with the option of using CC when BMI cannot be calculated. This revised MNA-SF increases the applicability of this rapid screening tool in clinical practice through the inclusion of a "malnourished" category.
OBJECTIVE: To validate a revision of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA(R)-SF) against the full MNA, a standard tool for nutritional evaluation. METHODS: A literature search identified studies that used the MNA for nutritional screening in geriatric patients. The contacted authors submitted original datasets that were merged into a single database. Various combinations of the questions on the current MNA-SF were tested using this database through combination analysis and ROC based derivation of classification thresholds. RESULTS: Twenty-seven datasets (n=6257 participants) were initially processed from which twelve were used in the current analysis on a sample of 2032 study participants (mean age 82.3y) with complete information on all MNA items. The original MNA-SF was a combination of six questions from the full MNA. A revised MNA-SF included calf circumference (CC) substituted for BMI performed equally well. A revised three-category scoring classification for this revised MNA-SF, using BMI and/or CC, had good sensitivity compared to the full MNA. CONCLUSION: The newly revised MNA-SF is a valid nutritional screening tool applicable to geriatric health care professionals with the option of using CC when BMI cannot be calculated. This revised MNA-SF increases the applicability of this rapid screening tool in clinical practice through the inclusion of a "malnourished" category.
Authors: M Dolores Ruiz-López; Reyes Artacho; Patricio Oliva; Rosario Moreno-Torres; Jorge Bolaños; Carlos de Teresa; M Carmen López Journal: Nutrition Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: E Wynn Dumartheray; M-A Krieg; J Cornuz; D R Whittamore; D P Lovell; P Burckhardt; S A Lanham-New Journal: J Hum Nutr Diet Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.089
Authors: B Vellas; H Villars; G Abellan; M E Soto; Y Rolland; Y Guigoz; J E Morley; W Chumlea; A Salva; L Z Rubenstein; P Garry Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Yves Rolland; Fabien Pillard; Adrian Klapouszczak; Emma Reynish; David Thomas; Sandrine Andrieu; Daniel Rivière; Bruno Vellas Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: K E Charlton; C Nichols; S Bowden; K Lambert; L Barone; M Mason; M Milosavljevic Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: A Pezzana; E Cereda; P Avagnina; G Malfi; E Paiola; Z Frighi; I Capizzi; E Sgnaolin; M L Amerio Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Luca Pasina; Lorenzo Colzani; Laura Cortesi; Mauro Tettamanti; Antonella Zambon; Alessandro Nobili; Andrea Mazzone; Paolo Mazzola; Giorgio Annoni; Giuseppe Bellelli Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Barbara J Polivka; Rodney Folz; John Myers; Russell Barnett; Demetra Antimisiaris; Anna Jorayeva; Bryan Beatty Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.228