Literature DB >> 34145487

Can the Vaginal Photoplethysmograph and Its Associated Methodology Be Used to Assess Anal Vasocongestion in Women and Men?

Megan L Sawatsky1, Kelly D Suschinsky2, Sofija Lavrinsek3, Meredith L Chivers4, Martin L Lalumière5.   

Abstract

Forty years ago, researchers documented changes in vascular and muscular activity within the anal canal of women and men who engaged in sexual self-stimulation. Vascular changes were assessed using a photoplethysmograph that aimed to detect changes in pelvic vasocongestion. An important advantage of detecting sexual response within the anal canal is that the device, its anatomical placement, and the data output are identical for women and men, therefore facilitating gender comparisons of response patterns. In this study, the vaginal photoplethysmograph (VPP), the most common measure of genital response in women, was administered intra-anally as an anal photoplethysmograph (APG) to examine its validity and sensitivity as an indicator of sexual response. The final sample comprised 20 women and 20 men who were exposed to 12, 90-s sexual and nonsexual film clips while their APG responses were recorded. Participants also rated their sexual arousal and affective responses to the stimuli. There was evidence that APG responses were specific to sexual stimuli and were sensitive to erotic intensity in women. The degree of discrimination between sexual and nonsexual stimuli was lower in men. Unlike most sexual psychophysiological studies, the positive correlation between physiological and self-reported sexual arousal was stronger in women than in men. There was a relatively high number of data artifacts and the waveform morphology was uncharacteristic of that typically observed with VPP. The potential role of anal musculature interference on the APG signal is discussed, as well as avenues for future research.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal vasocongestion; Photoplethysmography; Sex differences; Sexual psychophysiology; Sexual response

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34145487     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02069-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  35 in total

1.  Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Amanda D Timmers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Brain Oscillations and the Importance of Waveform Shape.

Authors:  Scott R Cole; Bradley Voytek
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Specificity of sexual arousal for sexual activities in men and women with conventional and masochistic sexual interests.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Carolyn Roy; Teresa Grimbos; James M Cantor; Michael C Seto
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2013-09-21

Review 4.  The Specificity of Women's Sexual Response and Its Relationship with Sexual Orientations: A Review and Ten Hypotheses.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

5.  A sex difference in features that elicit genital response.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Gerulf Rieger; Elizabeth Latty; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

7.  Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Michael C Seto; Ray Blanchard
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-12

8.  Baseline dimensions of the human vagina.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart; Adriana Izquierdo; E Scott Pretorius; David M Shera; Mayadah Shabbout; Alka Shaunik
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Michael C Seto; Martin L Lalumière; Ellen Laan; Teresa Grimbos
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-01-05

10.  Does menstrual cycle phase influence the gender specificity of heterosexual women's genital and subjective sexual arousal?

Authors:  Jennifer A Bossio; Kelly D Suschinsky; David A Puts; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2013-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.