Literature DB >> 18072857

Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films.

Meredith L Chivers1, Michael C Seto, Ray Blanchard.   

Abstract

In this study, the authors investigated the hypothesis that women's sexual orientation and sexual responses in the laboratory correlate less highly than do men's because women respond primarily to the sexual activities performed by actors, whereas men respond primarily to the gender of the actors. The participants were 20 homosexual women, 27 heterosexual women, 17 homosexual men, and 27 heterosexual men. The videotaped stimuli included men and women engaging in same-sex intercourse, solitary masturbation, or nude exercise (no sexual activity); human male-female copulation; and animal (bonobo chimpanzee or Pan paniscus) copulation. Genital and subjective sexual arousal were continuously recorded. The genital responses of both sexes were weakest to nude exercise and strongest to intercourse. As predicted, however, actor gender was more important for men than for women, and the level of sexual activity was more important for women than for men. Consistent with this result, women responded genitally to bonobo copulation, whereas men did not. An unexpected result was that homosexual women responded more to nude female targets exercising and masturbating than to nude male targets, whereas heterosexual women responded about the same to both sexes at each activity level. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18072857     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  30 in total

1.  Moderated Mediation of Perceived Intoxication and Sexual Arousal on Determinants of Sexual Risk Behavior in Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Katherine A Buckheit; Luke D Mitzel; Stephen A Maisto; Tibor Palfai; Peter Vanable
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  The neural basis of sex differences in sexual behavior: A quantitative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Adam Safron; Danilo Bzdok; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 3.  Assessment of female sexual arousal in forensic populations.

Authors:  Natasha M Knack; Lisa Murphy; Rebekah Ranger; Cindy Meston; J Paul Fedoroff
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Effects of mindfulness training on body awareness to sexual stimuli: implications for female sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  R Gina Silverstein; Anne-Catharine H Brown; Harold D Roth; Willoughby B Britton
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Sexual attraction to others: a comparison of two models of alloerotic responding in men.

Authors:  Ray Blanchard; Michael E Kuban; Thomas Blak; Philip E Klassen; Robert Dickey; James M Cantor
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-09-17

6.  Late positive potential to explicit sexual images associated with the number of sexual intercourse partners.

Authors:  Nicole Prause; Vaughn R Steele; Cameron Staley; Dean Sabatinelli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 7.  A neural circuit encoding sexual preference in humans.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-22

9.  Female same-sex sexuality from a dynamical systems perspective: sexual desire, motivation, and behavior.

Authors:  Rachel H Farr; Lisa M Diamond; Steven M Boker
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2014-09-06

Review 10.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.