Literature DB >> 24379080

Does menstrual cycle phase influence the gender specificity of heterosexual women's genital and subjective sexual arousal?

Jennifer A Bossio1, Kelly D Suschinsky, David A Puts, Meredith L Chivers.   

Abstract

Unlike men, heterosexual women's genital arousal is gender nonspecific, such that heterosexual women show relatively similar genital arousal to sexual stimuli depicting men and women but typically report greater subjective arousal to male stimuli. Based on the ovulatory-shift hypothesis-that women show a mid-cycle shift in preferences towards more masculine features during peak fertility-we predicted that heterosexual women's genital and subjective arousal would be gender specific (more arousal towards male stimuli) during peak fertility. Twenty-two naturally-cycling heterosexual women were assessed during the follicular and luteal phases of their menstrual cycle to examine the role of menstrual cycle phase in gender specificity of genital and subjective sexual arousal. Menstrual cycle phase was confirmed with salivary hormone assays; phase at the time of first testing was counterbalanced. Women's genital and subjective sexual arousal patterns were gender nonspecific, irrespective of cycle phase. Cycle phase at first testing session did not influence genital or subjective arousal in the second testing session. Similar to previous research, women's genital and subjective sexual arousal varied with cues of sexual activity, but neither genital nor subjective sexual arousal varied by gender cues, with the exception of masturbation stimuli, where women showed higher genital arousal to the stimuli depicting male compared to female actors. These data suggest that menstrual cycle phase does not influence the gender specificity of heterosexual women's genital and subjective sexual arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24379080     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-013-0233-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  6 in total

1.  Menstrual Cycle Changes in Daily Sexual Motivation and Behavior Among Sexually Diverse Cisgender Women.

Authors:  Lisa M Diamond; Janna A Dickenson; Karen L Blair
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 2.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  Automatic Direction of Spatial Attention to Male Versus Female Stimuli: A Comparison of Heterosexual Men and Women.

Authors:  Robert J Snowden; Catriona Curl; Katherine Jobbins; Chloe Lavington; Nicola S Gray
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-02-08

4.  Can the Vaginal Photoplethysmograph and Its Associated Methodology Be Used to Assess Anal Vasocongestion in Women and Men?

Authors:  Megan L Sawatsky; Kelly D Suschinsky; Sofija Lavrinsek; Meredith L Chivers; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-18

5.  Understanding heterosexual women's erotic flexibility: the role of attention in sexual evaluations and neural responses to sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Janna A Dickenson; Lisa Diamond; Jace B King; Kay Jenson; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women's Sexual Arousal.

Authors:  Arnaud Wisman; Ilan Shrira
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.