Literature DB >> 16168255

A sex difference in features that elicit genital response.

Meredith L Chivers1, J Michael Bailey.   

Abstract

Previous research suggests that women's genital arousal is an automatic response to sexual stimuli, whereas men's genital arousal is dependent upon stimulus features specific to their sexual interests. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that a nonhuman sexual stimulus would elicit a genital response in women but not in men. Eighteen heterosexual women and 18 heterosexual men viewed seven sexual film stimuli, six human films and one nonhuman primate film, while measurements of genital and subjective sexual arousal were recorded. Women showed small increases in genital arousal to the nonhuman stimulus and large increases in genital arousal to both human male and female stimuli. Men did not show any genital arousal to the nonhuman stimulus and demonstrated a category-specific pattern of arousal to the human stimuli that corresponded to their stated sexual orientation. These results suggest that stimulus features necessary to evoke genital arousal are much less specific in women than in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16168255     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  24 in total

1.  Effects of mindfulness training on body awareness to sexual stimuli: implications for female sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  R Gina Silverstein; Anne-Catharine H Brown; Harold D Roth; Willoughby B Britton
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.312

2.  Gender differences in the motivational processing of facial beauty.

Authors:  Boaz Levy; Dan Ariely; Nina Mazar; Won Chi; Scott Lukas; Igor Elman
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2008-05

Review 3.  Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-08-01

Review 4.  A neural circuit encoding sexual preference in humans.

Authors:  Timm B Poeppl; Berthold Langguth; Rainer Rupprecht; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Human and ape: the legend, the history and the DNA.

Authors:  A A Diamandopoulos; C P Goudas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 6.  Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Michael C Seto; Martin L Lalumière; Ellen Laan; Teresa Grimbos
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-01-05

Review 7.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

8.  Automatic and deliberate affective associations with sexual stimuli in women with superficial dyspareunia.

Authors:  Marieke Brauer; Peter J de Jong; Jorg Huijding; Ellen Laan; Moniek M ter Kuile
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-06-03

9.  Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes: long-term findings from the DCCT/ EDIC study cohort.

Authors:  Paul Enzlin; Raymond Rosen; Markus Wiegel; Jeanette Brown; Hunter Wessells; Patricia Gatcomb; Brandy Rutledge; Ka-Ling Chan; Patricia A Cleary
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Can the Vaginal Photoplethysmograph and Its Associated Methodology Be Used to Assess Anal Vasocongestion in Women and Men?

Authors:  Megan L Sawatsky; Kelly D Suschinsky; Sofija Lavrinsek; Meredith L Chivers; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.