Literature DB >> 34145315

Comparison of microsatellite instability detection by immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques in colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Franceska Dedeurwaerdere1, Kathleen Bm Claes2,3,4, Jo Van Dorpe5,4, Isabelle Rottiers5, Joni Van der Meulen2,4,6, Joke Breyne7, Koen Swaerts7, Geert Martens8,9.   

Abstract

DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) testing is crucial for diagnosing Lynch syndrome and detection of microsatellite unstable (MSI) tumors eligible for immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the relative diagnostic performance of three molecular MSI assays: polymerase chain reaction (PCR), MSI testing by Idylla and next-generation-sequencing (NGS) on 49 tumor samples (28 colorectal and 21 endometrial adenocarcinomas) versus immunohistochemistry (IHC). Discrepancies were investigated by MLH1 methylation analysis and integrated with germline results if available. Overall, the molecular assays achieved equivalent diagnostic performance for MSI detection with area under the ROC curves (AUC) of respectively 0.91 for Idylla and PCR, and 0.93 for NGS. In colorectal cancers with tumor cell percentages ≥ 30% all three molecular assays achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 1) versus IHC. Also, in endometrial cancers, all three molecular assays showed equivalent diagnostic performance, albeit at a clearly lower sensitivity ranging from 58% for Idylla to 75% for NGS, corresponding to negative predictive values from 78 to 86%. PCR, Idylla and NGS show similar diagnostic performance for dMMR detection in colorectal and endometrial cancers. Molecular MSI analysis has lower sensitivity for dMMR detection in endometrial cancer indicating that combined use of both IHC and molecular methods is recommended.Clinical Trial Number/IRB: B1172020000040, Ethical Committee, AZ Delta General Hospital.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34145315     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91974-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  48 in total

1.  Epidemiological, clinical and molecular characterization of Lynch-like syndrome: A population-based study.

Authors:  Noora Porkka; Laura Lahtinen; Maarit Ahtiainen; Jan P Böhm; Teijo Kuopio; Samuli Eldfors; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Toni T Seppälä; Päivi Peltomäki
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing in phenotyping colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor; Lawrence J Burgart; Olga Leontovich; Richard M Goldberg; Julie M Cunningham; Daniel J Sargent; Catherine Walsh-Vockley; Gloria M Petersen; Michael D Walsh; Barbara A Leggett; Joanne P Young; Melissa A Barker; Jeremy R Jass; John Hopper; Steve Gallinger; Bharati Bapat; Mark Redston; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Somatic mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 are a frequent cause of mismatch-repair deficiency in Lynch syndrome-like tumors.

Authors:  Arjen R Mensenkamp; Ingrid P Vogelaar; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Monique Goossens; Hicham Ouchene; Sandra J B Hendriks-Cornelissen; Michael P Kwint; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Iris D Nagtegaal; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Edward Martin; Mark Arnold; Karamjit Khanduja; Philip Kuebler; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Kaisa Sotamaa; Thomas W Prior; Judith Westman; Jenny Panescu; Dan Fix; Janet Lockman; Ilene Comeras; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895-2015.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Carrie L Snyder; Trudy G Shaw; Christopher D Heinen; Megan P Hitchins
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Immunohistochemistry as first-line screening for detecting colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: a 2-antibody panel may be as predictive as a 4-antibody panel.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; Laura H Tang; Efsevia Vakiani; Jose G Guillem; Zsofia K Stadler; Robert A Soslow; Nora Katabi; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Larissa K Temple; Garrett M Nash; W Douglas Wong; Kenneth Offit; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability.

Authors:  J M Cunningham; E R Christensen; D J Tester; C Y Kim; P C Roche; L J Burgart; S N Thibodeau
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  H T Lynch; P M Lynch; S J Lanspa; C L Snyder; J F Lynch; C R Boland
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part II. The utility of microsatellite instability testing.

Authors:  Liying Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part I. The utility of immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Jinru Shia
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.568

View more
  6 in total

1.  Microsatellite Instability-High Endometrial Cancers with MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Have Distinct Molecular and Clinical Profiles.

Authors:  Beryl L Manning-Geist; Ying L Liu; Kelly A Devereaux; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Qin C Zhou; Weining Ma; Pier Selenica; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Lea A Moukarzel; Timothy Hoang; Sushmita Gordhandas; Maria M Rubinstein; Claire F Friedman; Carol Aghajanian; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Zsofia K Stadler; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Alexia Iasonos; Dmitriy Zamarin; Lora H Ellenson; Yulia Lakhman; Diana L Mandelker; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 13.801

2.  Mesothelioma Mouse Models with Mixed Genomic States of Chromosome and Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Yurong Song; Shaneen S Baxter; Lisheng Dai; Chelsea Sanders; Sandra Burkett; Ryan N Baugher; Stephanie D Mellott; Todd B Young; Heidi E Lawhorn; Simone Difilippantonio; Baktiar Karim; Yuwaraj Kadariya; Ligia A Pinto; Joseph R Testa; Robert H Shoemaker
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Relationship between ATOH1 and tumor microenvironment in colon adenocarcinoma patients with different microsatellite instability status.

Authors:  Weiming Mou; Lingxuan Zhu; Tao Yang; Anqi Lin; Qiong Lyu; Linlang Guo; Zaoqu Liu; Quan Cheng; Jian Zhang; Peng Luo
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.429

4.  Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing and the Molecular Tumor Board for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Report from KSMO and KCSG Precision Medicine Networking Group.

Authors:  Shinkyo Yoon; Miso Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Han Sang Kim; Seung Tae Kim; Jihun Kim; Hongseok Yun; Changhoon Yoo; Hee Kyung Ahn; Hyo Song Kim; In Hee Lee; In-Ho Kim; Inkeun Park; Jae Ho Jeong; Jaekyung Cheon; Jin Won Kim; Jina Yun; Sun Min Lim; Yongjun Cha; Se Jin Jang; Dae Young Zang; Tae Won Kim; Jin Hyoung Kang; Jee Hyun Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 5.  Development of New Cancer Treatment by Identifying and Focusing the Genetic Mutations or Altered Expression in Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Yun-Hsin Tang; Chiao-Yun Lin; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 6.  Microsatellite Instability: From the Implementation of the Detection to a Prognostic and Predictive Role in Cancers.

Authors:  Martina Amato; Renato Franco; Gaetano Facchini; Raffaele Addeo; Fortunato Ciardiello; Massimiliano Berretta; Giulia Vita; Alessandro Sgambato; Sandro Pignata; Michele Caraglia; Marina Accardo; Federica Zito Marino
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.