Literature DB >> 35849120

Microsatellite Instability-High Endometrial Cancers with MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Have Distinct Molecular and Clinical Profiles.

Beryl L Manning-Geist1, Ying L Liu2,3,4, Kelly A Devereaux5, Arnaud Da Cruz Paula1, Qin C Zhou6, Weining Ma7, Pier Selenica5, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy5, Lea A Moukarzel1, Timothy Hoang5, Sushmita Gordhandas1, Maria M Rubinstein2,4, Claire F Friedman2,4, Carol Aghajanian2,4, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum1,8, Zsofia K Stadler2,3,4, Jorge S Reis-Filho5, Alexia Iasonos6, Dmitriy Zamarin2,4, Lora H Ellenson5, Yulia Lakhman7, Diana L Mandelker5, Britta Weigelt5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial carcinomas are underpinned by distinct mechanisms of DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D). We sought to characterize the clinical and genetic features of MSI-H endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic mutations in MMR genes or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1ph). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Of > 1,100 patients with endometrial cancer that underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing, 184 had MSI-H endometrial cancers due to somatic MMR mutations or MLH1ph, or harbored pathogenic germline MMR mutations. Clinicopathologic features, mutational landscape, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) scores were compared among MMR-D groups using nonparametric tests. Log-rank tests were used for categorical associations; Kaplan-Meier method and Wald test based on Cox proportional hazards models were employed for continuous variables and survival analyses.
RESULTS: Compared with patients with germline (n = 25) and somatic (n = 39) mutations, patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers (n = 120) were older (P < 0.001), more obese (P = 0.001) and had more advanced disease at diagnosis (P = 0.025). MLH1ph endometrial cancers were enriched for JAK1 somatic mutations as opposed to germline MMR-D endometrial cancers which showed enrichment for pathogenic ERBB2 mutations. MLH1ph endometrial cancers exhibited lower tumor mutational burden and TIL scores compared with endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic MMR mutations (P < 0.01). MLH1ph endometrial cancer patients had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on univariate analysis, but in multivariable models, stage at diagnosis remained the only predictor of survival. For stage I/II endometrial cancer, two-year PFS was inferior for patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers compared with germline and somatic MMR groups (70% vs. 100%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: MLH1ph endometrial cancers likely constitute a distinct clinicopathologic entity compared with germline and somatic MMR-D ECs with potential treatment implications. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35849120      PMCID: PMC9529954          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-0713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  50 in total

1.  Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Diana Miao; Claire A Margolis; Wenhua Gao; Martin H Voss; Wei Li; Dylan J Martini; Craig Norton; Dominick Bossé; Stephanie M Wankowicz; Dana Cullen; Christine Horak; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Adam Tracy; Marios Giannakis; Frank Stephen Hodi; Charles G Drake; Mark W Ball; Mohamad E Allaf; Alexandra Snyder; Matthew D Hellmann; Thai Ho; Robert J Motzer; Sabina Signoretti; William G Kaelin; Toni K Choueiri; Eliezer M Van Allen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mismatch repair deficiency identifies patients with high-intermediate-risk (HIR) endometrioid endometrial cancer at the highest risk of recurrence: A prognostic biomarker.

Authors:  Floor J Backes; Jennifer Haag; Casey M Cosgrove; Adrian Suarez; David E Cohn; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014.

Authors:  R Salgado; C Denkert; S Demaria; N Sirtaine; F Klauschen; G Pruneri; S Wienert; G Van den Eynden; F L Baehner; F Penault-Llorca; E A Perez; E A Thompson; W F Symmans; A L Richardson; J Brock; C Criscitiello; H Bailey; M Ignatiadis; G Floris; J Sparano; Z Kos; T Nielsen; D L Rimm; K H Allison; J S Reis-Filho; S Loibl; C Sotiriou; G Viale; S Badve; S Adams; K Willard-Gallo; S Loi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Defining obesity as a disease.

Authors:  M J Müller; C Geisler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Relationship between MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 gene-specific alterations and tumor mutational burden in 1057 microsatellite instability-high solid tumors.

Authors:  Mohamed E Salem; J Nicholas Bodor; Alberto Puccini; Joanne Xiu; Richard M Goldberg; Axel Grothey; W Michael Korn; Anthony F Shields; William M Worrilow; Edward S Kim; Heinz-Josef Lenz; John L Marshall; Michael J Hall
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Analysis of mutational signatures in primary and metastatic endometrial cancer reveals distinct patterns of DNA repair defects and shifts during tumor progression.

Authors:  Charles W Ashley; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Rahul Kumar; Diana Mandelker; Xin Pei; Nadeem Riaz; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Cancer Statistics, 2021.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Analysis of survival by tumor response.

Authors:  J R Anderson; K C Cain; R D Gelber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Heidi Britton; Melissa K McConechy; Jessica N McAlpine; Remi Nout; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Y Brucker; Joseph W Carlson; Elisabeth Epstein; Tilman T Rau; Tjalling Bosse; David N Church; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 7.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.