Literature DB >> 30575961

Epidemiological, clinical and molecular characterization of Lynch-like syndrome: A population-based study.

Noora Porkka1, Laura Lahtinen2, Maarit Ahtiainen3, Jan P Böhm2, Teijo Kuopio2,4, Samuli Eldfors5, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin6,7,8, Toni T Seppälä9, Päivi Peltomäki1.   

Abstract

Colorectal carcinomas that are mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient in the absence of MLH1 promoter methylation or germline mutations represent Lynch-like syndrome (LLS). Double somatic events inactivating MMR genes are involved in the etiology of LLS tumors. Our purpose was to define the clinical and broader molecular hallmarks of LLS tumors and the population incidence of LLS, which remain poorly characterized. We investigated 762 consecutive colorectal carcinomas operated in Central Finland in 2000-2010. LLS cases were identified by a stepwise protocol based on MMR protein expression, MLH1 methylation and MMR gene mutation status. LLS tumors were profiled for CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and somatic mutations in 578 cancer-relevant genes. Among 107 MMR-deficient tumors, 81 (76%) were attributable to MLH1 promoter methylation and 9 (8%) to germline mutations (Lynch syndrome, LS), leaving 14 LLS cases (13%) (3 remained unclassified). LLS carcinomas were diagnosed at a mean age of 65 years (vs. 44 years in LS, p < 0.001), had a proximal to distal ratio of 1:1, and all were BRAF V600E-negative. Two somatic events in MMR genes were identifiable in 11 tumors (79%). As novel findings, the tumors contained an average of 31 nonsynonymous somatic mutations/Mb and 13/14 were CIMP-positive. In conclusion, we establish the epidemiological, clinical and molecular characteristics of LLS in a population-based study design. Significantly more frequent CIMP-positivity and lower rates of somatic mutations make a distinction to LS. The absence of BRAF V600E mutation separates LLS colorectal carcinomas from MLH1-methylated colorectal carcinomas with CIMP-positive phenotype.
© 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CpG Island Methylator phenotype; DNA mismatch repair; MSI; colorectal carcinoma; lynch syndrome; lynch-like syndrome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30575961     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  11 in total

Review 1.  Liquid Biopsy as a Source of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Management of Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Gergely Buglyó; Jakub Styk; Ondrej Pös; Ádám Csók; Vanda Repiska; Beáta Soltész; Tomas Szemes; Bálint Nagy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  How Should We Test for Lynch Syndrome? A Review of Current Guidelines and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Richard Gallon; Peter Gawthorpe; Rachel L Phelps; Christine Hayes; Gillian M Borthwick; Mauro Santibanez-Koref; Michael S Jackson; John Burn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome and Strategies to Distinguish Lynch-Related Tumors from Sporadic MSI/dMMR Tumors.

Authors:  Julie Leclerc; Catherine Vermaut; Marie-Pierre Buisine
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  MLH1 promoter hypermethylation predicts poorer prognosis in mismatch repair deficiency endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Enami Kaneko; Naoki Sato; Tae Sugawara; Aya Noto; Kazue Takahashi; Kenichi Makino; Yukihiro Terada
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Lynch-like Syndrome: Potential Mechanisms and Management.

Authors:  Alejandro Martínez-Roca; Mar Giner-Calabuig; Oscar Murcia; Adela Castillejo; José Luis Soto; Anabel García-Heredia; Rodrigo Jover
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Endometrial Carcinoma: From Universal to Age-Selective MLH1 Methylation Analysis.

Authors:  Annukka Pasanen; Mikko Loukovaara; Elina Kaikkonen; Alisa Olkinuora; Kirsi Pylvänäinen; Pia Alhopuro; Päivi Peltomäki; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Ralf Bützow
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Prognostic significance of spatial and density analysis of T lymphocytes in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hanna Elomaa; Maarit Ahtiainen; Sara A Väyrynen; Shuji Ogino; Jonathan A Nowak; Marjukka Friman; Olli Helminen; Erkki-Ville Wirta; Toni T Seppälä; Jan Böhm; Markus J Mäkinen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Teijo Kuopio; Juha P Väyrynen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 9.075

8.  Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Annukka Pasanen; Mikko Loukovaara; Ralf Bützow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Comparison of microsatellite instability detection by immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques in colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Franceska Dedeurwaerdere; Kathleen Bm Claes; Jo Van Dorpe; Isabelle Rottiers; Joni Van der Meulen; Joke Breyne; Koen Swaerts; Geert Martens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Does breast carcinoma belong to the Lynch syndrome tumor spectrum? - Somatic mutational profiles vs. ovarian and colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Noora K Porkka; Alisa Olkinuora; Teijo Kuopio; Maarit Ahtiainen; Samuli Eldfors; Henrikki Almusa; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Päivi Peltomäki
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.