Alina van de Burgt1, Petra Dibbets-Schneider2, Cornelis H Slump3, Arthur J H A Scholte4, Douwe E Atsma4, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei2,5, Floris H P van Velden2. 1. Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. l.oei@utwente.nl. 2. Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantitative SPECT enables absolute quantification of uptake in perfusion defects. The aim of this experimental study is to assess quantitative accuracy and precision of a novel iterative reconstruction technique (Evolution; GE Healthcare) for the potential application of response monitoring using 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Acquisitions of an anthropomorphic torso phantom with cardiac insert containing defects (with varying sizes), filled with 99mTc-pertechnetate, were performed on a SPECT/CT (Discovery 670 Pro, GE Healthcare). Subsequently, volumes of interest of the defects were manually drawn on CT to assess the recovery coefficient (RC). Bull's eye plots were composed to evaluate the uptake per segment. Finally, 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT scans of 10 CAD patients were used to illustrate clinical application. RESULTS: The phantom study indicated that Evolution showed convergence after 7 iterations and 10 subsets. The average repeatability deviation of all configurations was 2.91% and 3.15% (%SD mean) for filtered (Butterworth) and unfiltered data, respectively. The accuracy after post-filtering was lower compared to the unfiltered data with a mean (SD) RC of 0.63 (0.05) and 0.70 (0.07), respectively (p < 0.05). More artificial defects were found on Bull's eye plots created with the unfiltered data compared to filtered data. Eight out of ten patients showed significant changes in uptake before and after treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Quantification of 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT seems feasible for CAD patients when 7 iterations (10 subsets), Butterworth post-filtering (cut off frequency 0.52 in cycles/cm, order of 5) and manual CT-delineation are applied. However, future prospective patient studies are required for clinical application.
BACKGROUND: Quantitative SPECT enables absolute quantification of uptake in perfusion defects. The aim of this experimental study is to assess quantitative accuracy and precision of a novel iterative reconstruction technique (Evolution; GE Healthcare) for the potential application of response monitoring using 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Acquisitions of an anthropomorphic torso phantom with cardiac insert containing defects (with varying sizes), filled with 99mTc-pertechnetate, were performed on a SPECT/CT (Discovery 670 Pro, GE Healthcare). Subsequently, volumes of interest of the defects were manually drawn on CT to assess the recovery coefficient (RC). Bull's eye plots were composed to evaluate the uptake per segment. Finally, 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT scans of 10 CAD patients were used to illustrate clinical application. RESULTS: The phantom study indicated that Evolution showed convergence after 7 iterations and 10 subsets. The average repeatability deviation of all configurations was 2.91% and 3.15% (%SD mean) for filtered (Butterworth) and unfiltered data, respectively. The accuracy after post-filtering was lower compared to the unfiltered data with a mean (SD) RC of 0.63 (0.05) and 0.70 (0.07), respectively (p < 0.05). More artificial defects were found on Bull's eye plots created with the unfiltered data compared to filtered data. Eight out of ten patients showed significant changes in uptake before and after treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Quantification of 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/CT seems feasible for CAD patients when 7 iterations (10 subsets), Butterworth post-filtering (cut off frequency 0.52 in cycles/cm, order of 5) and manual CT-delineation are applied. However, future prospective patient studies are required for clinical application.
Authors: Michael K O'connor; Brad Kemp; Frank Anstett; Paul Christian; Edward P Ficaro; Eric Frey; Mark Jacobs; James N Kritzman; Robert A Pooley; Michael Wilk Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Piotr J Slomka; James Gerlach; Ling de Yang; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Louise E J Thomson; Guido Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Louise D Metz; Mary Beattie; Robert Hom; Rita F Redberg; Deborah Grady; Kirsten E Fleischmann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-12-29 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Angela Collarino; Lenka M Pereira Arias-Bouda; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Pieternel van der Tol; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Floris H P van Velden Journal: Med Phys Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Stephan Gerhard Nekolla; Georg Dobrozemsky; Thomas Grubinger; Barry Lynn Shulkin; Markus Schwaiger Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Jan van Ramshorst; Jeroen J Bax; Saskia L M A Beeres; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Stijntje D Roes; Marcel P M Stokkel; Albert de Roos; Willem E Fibbe; Jaap J Zwaginga; Eric Boersma; Martin J Schalij; Douwe E Atsma Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Caroline Jaarsma; Tim Leiner; Sebastiaan C Bekkers; Harry J Crijns; Joachim E Wildberger; Eike Nagel; Patricia J Nelemans; Simon Schalla Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hein J Verberne; Wanda Acampa; Constantinos Anagnostopoulos; Jim Ballinger; Frank Bengel; Pieter De Bondt; Ronny R Buechel; Alberto Cuocolo; Berthe L F van Eck-Smit; Albert Flotats; Marcus Hacker; Cecilia Hindorf; Philip A Kaufmann; Oliver Lindner; Michael Ljungberg; Markus Lonsdale; Alain Manrique; David Minarik; Arthur J H A Scholte; Riemer H J A Slart; Elin Trägårdh; Tim C de Wit; Birger Hesse Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 9.236