Literature DB >> 19454638

Intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection for chronic myocardial ischemia: a randomized controlled trial.

Jan van Ramshorst1, Jeroen J Bax, Saskia L M A Beeres, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, Stijntje D Roes, Marcel P M Stokkel, Albert de Roos, Willem E Fibbe, Jaap J Zwaginga, Eric Boersma, Martin J Schalij, Douwe E Atsma.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Previous studies have suggested that bone marrow cell injection may improve myocardial perfusion and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection on myocardial perfusion and LV function in patients with chronic myocardial ischemia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at a Netherlands university hospital, May 1, 2005-March 3, 2008 (6-month follow-up ended September 2008) of 50 patients with chronic myocardial ischemia (mean age [SD], 64 [8] years; 43 men). INCLUSION CRITERIA: severe angina pectoris despite optimal medical therapy and myocardial ischemia. All patients were ineligible for conventional revascularization.
INTERVENTIONS: Intramyocardial injection of 100 x 10(6) autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells or placebo solution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primarily, the summed stress score, a 17-segment score for stress myocardial perfusion assessed by Tc-99m tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Secondary included LV ejection fraction (LVEF), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class, and Seattle Angina Questionnaire quality-of-life score (mean difference >5% considered clinically significant).
RESULTS: After 3-month follow-up, the summed stress score (mean [SD]) improved from 23.5 (4.7) to 20.1 (4.6) (P < .001) in the bone marrow cell group, compared with a decrease from 24.8 (5.5) to 23.7 (5.4) (P = .004) in the placebo group. In the bone marrow cell-treated patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a 3% absolute increase in LVEF was observed at 3 months (95% CI, 0.5% to 4.7%; n = 18), but the placebo group showed no improvement. CCS angina score improved significantly in the bone marrow cell group (6-month absolute difference, -0.79; 95% CI, -1.10 to -0.48; P < .001) compared with no significant improvement in the placebo group. Quality-of-life score increased from 56% (9%) to 64% (12%) at 3 months and 69% (12%) at 6 months in bone marrow cell-treated patients, compared with a smaller increase in the placebo group from 57% (11%) to 61% (14%) to 64% (17%). The improvements in CCS class and quality of life score were significantly greater in bone marrow cell-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In this short-term study of patients with chronic myocardial ischemia refractory to medical treatment, intramyocardial bone marrow cell injection resulted in a statistically significant but modest improvement in myocardial perfusion compared with placebo. Further studies are required to assess long-term results and efficacy for mortality and morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: trialregister.nl Identifier: NTR400 and isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN58194927.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19454638     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  91 in total

1.  Cell therapy for refractory angina: time for more ACTion.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Robert D Simari
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 2.  Advancements in pharmacotherapy for angina.

Authors:  Ankur Jain; Islam Y Elgendy; Mohammad Al-Ani; Nayan Agarwal; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 3.  Protein localization in the plant Golgi apparatus and the trans-Golgi network.

Authors:  C Saint-Jore-Dupas; V Gomord; N Paris
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Intramyocardial navigation and mapping for stem cell delivery.

Authors:  Peter J Psaltis; Andrew C W Zannettino; Stan Gronthos; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  General overview of the Seventh International Symposium on Stem Cell Therapy and Cardiovascular Innovations.

Authors:  Enrique Gutiérrez; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; Eugenia Vázquez Alvarez; Adolfo Villa; Lucia Fernández; Sandra Vázquez; José Lorenzo; Eugenia Fernández-Santos; Pedro L Sánchez; Francisco Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Tracking stem cells for cardiovascular applications in vivo: focus on imaging techniques.

Authors:  Yingli Fu; Nicole Azene; Yi Xu; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-08-01

Review 7.  Cell tracking and the development of cell-based therapies: a view from the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network.

Authors:  Martin Rodriguez-Porcel; Marvin W Kronenberg; Timothy D Henry; Jay H Traverse; Carl J Pepine; Stephen G Ellis; James T Willerson; Lemuel A Moyé; Robert D Simari
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

8.  Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave myocardial revascularization therapy for refractory angina pectoris.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; Megha Prasad; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel; Guy S Reeder; Darshak Karia; Anthony N DeMaria; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 9.  Antagonist molecules in the treatment of angina.

Authors:  Ashish K Gupta; David Winchester; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.889

Review 10.  Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.