Liang Shen1,2, Yongqin Liu3,4, Michelle A Allen5, Baiqing Xu1, Ninglian Wang6, Timothy J Williams5, Feng Wang1, Yuguang Zhou7, Qing Liu7, Ricardo Cavicchioli8. 1. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System and Resources Environment, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. 2. College of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, 241000, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System and Resources Environment, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. yqliu@itpcas.ac.cn. 4. Center for the Pan-third Pole Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China. yqliu@itpcas.ac.cn. 5. School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, China. 6. College of Urban and Environmental Science, Northwest University, Xian, 710069, Australia. 7. China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC), Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China. 8. School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, China. r.cavicchioli@unsw.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms drive critical global biogeochemical cycles and dominate the biomass in Earth's expansive cold biosphere. Determining the genomic traits that enable psychrophiles to grow in cold environments informs about their physiology and adaptive responses. However, defining important genomic traits of psychrophiles has proven difficult, with the ability to extrapolate genomic knowledge to environmental relevance proving even more difficult. RESULTS: Here we examined the bacterial genus Arthrobacter and, assisted by genome sequences of new Tibetan Plateau isolates, defined a new clade, Group C, that represents isolates from polar and alpine environments. Group C had a superior ability to grow at -1°C and possessed genome G+C content, amino acid composition, predicted protein stability, and functional capacities (e.g., sulfur metabolism and mycothiol biosynthesis) that distinguished it from non-polar or alpine Group A Arthrobacter. Interrogation of nearly 1000 metagenomes identified an over-representation of Group C in Canadian permafrost communities from a simulated spring-thaw experiment, indicative of niche adaptation, and an under-representation of Group A in all polar and alpine samples, indicative of a general response to environmental temperature. CONCLUSION: The findings illustrate a capacity to define genomic markers of specific taxa that potentially have value for environmental monitoring of cold environments, including environmental change arising from anthropogenic impact. More broadly, the study illustrates the challenges involved in extrapolating from genomic and physiological data to an environmental setting. Video Abstract.
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms drive critical global biogeochemical cycles and dominate the biomass in Earth's expansive cold biosphere. Determining the genomic traits that enable psychrophiles to grow in cold environments informs about their physiology and adaptive responses. However, defining important genomic traits of psychrophiles has proven difficult, with the ability to extrapolate genomic knowledge to environmental relevance proving even more difficult. RESULTS: Here we examined the bacterial genus Arthrobacter and, assisted by genome sequences of new Tibetan Plateau isolates, defined a new clade, Group C, that represents isolates from polar and alpine environments. Group C had a superior ability to grow at -1°C and possessed genome G+C content, amino acid composition, predicted protein stability, and functional capacities (e.g., sulfur metabolism and mycothiol biosynthesis) that distinguished it from non-polar or alpine Group A Arthrobacter. Interrogation of nearly 1000 metagenomes identified an over-representation of Group C in Canadian permafrost communities from a simulated spring-thaw experiment, indicative of niche adaptation, and an under-representation of Group A in all polar and alpine samples, indicative of a general response to environmental temperature. CONCLUSION: The findings illustrate a capacity to define genomic markers of specific taxa that potentially have value for environmental monitoring of cold environments, including environmental change arising from anthropogenic impact. More broadly, the study illustrates the challenges involved in extrapolating from genomic and physiological data to an environmental setting. Video Abstract.
Authors: M C Y Lau; B T Stackhouse; A C Layton; A Chauhan; T A Vishnivetskaya; K Chourey; J Ronholm; N C S Mykytczuk; P C Bennett; G Lamarche-Gagnon; N Burton; W H Pollard; C R Omelon; D M Medvigy; R L Hettich; S M Pfiffner; L G Whyte; T C Onstott Journal: ISME J Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka; Eva F Caceres; Jimmy H Saw; Disa Bäckström; Lina Juzokaite; Emmelien Vancaester; Kiley W Seitz; Karthik Anantharaman; Piotr Starnawski; Kasper U Kjeldsen; Matthew B Stott; Takuro Nunoura; Jillian F Banfield; Andreas Schramm; Brett J Baker; Anja Spang; Thijs J G Ettema Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Daniel R Colman; Saroj Poudel; Blake W Stamps; Eric S Boyd; John R Spear Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kenneth Timmis; Ricardo Cavicchioli; José Luis Garcia; Balbina Nogales; Max Chavarría; Lisa Stein; Terry J McGenity; Nicole Webster; Brajesh K Singh; Jo Handelsman; Victor de Lorenzo; Carla Pruzzo; James Timmis; Juan Luis Ramos Martín; Willy Verstraete; Mike Jetten; Antoine Danchin; Wei Huang; Jack Gilbert; Rup Lal; Helena Santos; Sang Yup Lee; Angela Sessitsch; Paola Bonfante; Lone Gram; Raymond T P Lin; Eliora Ron; Z Ceren Karahan; Jan Roelof van der Meer; Seza Artunkal; Dieter Jahn; Lucy Harper Journal: Environ Microbiol Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 5.491
Authors: Joseph J Grzymski; Christian S Riesenfeld; Timothy J Williams; Alex M Dussaq; Hugh Ducklow; Matthew Erickson; Ricardo Cavicchioli; Alison E Murray Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Ricardo Cavicchioli; William J Ripple; Kenneth N Timmis; Farooq Azam; Lars R Bakken; Matthew Baylis; Michael J Behrenfeld; Antje Boetius; Philip W Boyd; Aimée T Classen; Thomas W Crowther; Roberto Danovaro; Christine M Foreman; Jef Huisman; David A Hutchins; Janet K Jansson; David M Karl; Britt Koskella; David B Mark Welch; Jennifer B H Martiny; Mary Ann Moran; Victoria J Orphan; David S Reay; Justin V Remais; Virginia I Rich; Brajesh K Singh; Lisa Y Stein; Frank J Stewart; Matthew B Sullivan; Madeleine J H van Oppen; Scott C Weaver; Eric A Webb; Nicole S Webster Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Pratibha Panwar; Michelle A Allen; Timothy J Williams; Alyce M Hancock; Sarah Brazendale; James Bevington; Simon Roux; David Páez-Espino; Stephen Nayfach; Maureen Berg; Frederik Schulz; I-Min A Chen; Marcel Huntemann; Nicole Shapiro; Nikos C Kyrpides; Tanja Woyke; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Ricardo Cavicchioli Journal: Microbiome Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Keegan Koning; Richenda McFarlane; Jessica T Gosse; Sara Lawrence; Lynnea Carr; Derrick Horne; Nancy Van Wagoner; Christopher N Boddy; Naowarat Cheeptham Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 6.064