Literature DB >> 32062778

Advances in monitoring soil microbial community dynamic and function.

K K Nkongolo1,2, R Narendrula-Kotha3.   

Abstract

Microorganisms are vital to the overall ecosystem functioning, stability, and sustainability. Soil fertility and health depend on chemical composition and also on the qualitative and quantitative nature of microorganisms inhabiting it. Historically, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE), single-strand conformation polymorphism, DNA amplification fingerprinting, amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, length heterogeneity PCR, and ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis were used to assess soil microbial community structure (SMCS), abundance, and diversity. However, these methods had significant shortcomings and limitations for application in land reclamation monitoring. SMCS has been primarily determined by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis. This method provides a direct measure of viable biomass in addition to a biochemical profile of the microbial community. PLFA has limitations such as overlap in the composition of microorganisms and the specificity of PLFAs signature. In recent years, high-throughput next-generation sequencing has dramatically increased the resolution and detectable spectrum of diverse microbial phylotypes from environmental samples and it plays a significant role in microbial ecology studies. Next-generation sequencings using 454, Illumina, SOLiD, and Ion Torrent platforms are rapid and flexible. The two methods, PLFA and next-generation sequencing, are useful in detecting changes in microbial community diversity and structure in different ecosystems. Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) and nanopore sequencing technologies represent third-generation sequencing (TGS) platforms that have been developed to address the shortcomings of second-generation sequencing (SGS). Enzymatic and soil respiration analyses are performed to further determine soil quality and microbial activities. Other valuable methods that are being recently applied to microbial function and structures include NanoSIM, GeoChip, and DNA stable staple isotope probing (DNA-SIP) technologies. They are powerful metagenomics tool for analyzing microbial communities, including their structure, metabolic potential, diversity, and their impact on ecosystem functions. This review is a critical analysis of current methods used in monitoring soil microbial community dynamic and functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental monitoring; Measuring microbial function and metabolism; Microbial diversity and structure; Next- and third-generation sequencing; PLFA; Soil microbial community

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32062778     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-020-00549-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  96 in total

1.  DNA stable-isotope probing (DNA-SIP).

Authors:  Eric A Dunford; Josh D Neufeld
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2.

Authors:  Zhili He; Meiying Xu; Ye Deng; Sanghoon Kang; Laurie Kellogg; Liyou Wu; Joy D Van Nostrand; Sarah E Hobbie; Peter B Reich; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  454 pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity revealed by a comparative study of soils from mining subsidence and reclamation areas.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Longqian Chen; Hongyu Wen; Tianjian Zhou; Ting Zhang; Xiali Gao
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.351

4.  Generation of multimillion-sequence 16S rRNA gene libraries from complex microbial communities by assembling paired-end illumina reads.

Authors:  Andrea K Bartram; Michael D J Lynch; Jennifer C Stearns; Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb; Josh D Neufeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Soil respiration, climate change and the role of microbial communities.

Authors:  O Roger Anderson
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2011-05-23

6.  Changes in enzymatic activities in metal contaminated and reclaimed lands in Northern Ontario (Canada).

Authors:  Ramya Narendrula-Kotha; Kabwe K Nkongolo
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 6.291

7.  Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample.

Authors:  Chengwei Luo; Despina Tsementzi; Nikos Kyrpides; Timothy Read; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  High-throughput metagenomic technologies for complex microbial community analysis: open and closed formats.

Authors:  Jizhong Zhou; Zhili He; Yunfeng Yang; Ye Deng; Susannah G Tringe; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Functional Gene Array-Based Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Detection of Microbial Populations in Complex Communities.

Authors:  Zhou Shi; Huaqun Yin; Joy D Van Nostrand; James W Voordeckers; Qichao Tu; Ye Deng; Mengting Yuan; Aifen Zhou; Ping Zhang; Naijia Xiao; Daliang Ning; Zhili He; Liyou Wu; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.496

10.  Quantifying the Sensitivity of Soil Microbial Communities to Silver Sulfide Nanoparticles Using Metagenome Sequencing.

Authors:  Casey L Doolette; Vadakattu V S R Gupta; Yang Lu; Justin L Payne; Damien J Batstone; Jason K Kirby; Divina A Navarro; Mike J McLaughlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Whole genome strategies and bioremediation insight into dehalogenase-producing bacteria.

Authors:  Habeebat Adekilekun Oyewusi; Roswanira Abdul Wahab; Fahrul Huyop
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Evaluation of changes in the microbial community structure in the sediments of a constructed wetland over the years.

Authors:  Zeinah Elhaj Baddar; Xiaoyu Xu
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.667

Review 3.  Potential of Meta-Omics to Provide Modern Microbial Indicators for Monitoring Soil Quality and Securing Food Production.

Authors:  Christophe Djemiel; Samuel Dequiedt; Battle Karimi; Aurélien Cottin; Walid Horrigue; Arthur Bailly; Ali Boutaleb; Sophie Sadet-Bourgeteau; Pierre-Alain Maron; Nicolas Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré; Lionel Ranjard; Sébastien Terrat
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Methodological Aspects of Multiplex Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-Technique to Describe the Genetic Diversity of Soil Bacteria, Archaea and Fungi.

Authors:  Agata Gryta; Magdalena Frąc
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Recent Advanced Technologies for the Characterization of Xenobiotic-Degrading Microorganisms and Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Sandhya Mishra; Ziqiu Lin; Shimei Pang; Wenping Zhang; Pankaj Bhatt; Shaohua Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 6.  Inferring microbiota functions from taxonomic genes: a review.

Authors:  Christophe Djemiel; Pierre-Alain Maron; Sébastien Terrat; Samuel Dequiedt; Aurélien Cottin; Lionel Ranjard
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Biochemical composition and function of subalpine shrubland and meadow soil microbiomes in the Qilian Mountains, Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, China.

Authors:  Qiuyun Fan; Yuguo Yang; Yuqing Geng; Youlin Wu; Zhanen Niu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Linking genomic and physiological characteristics of psychrophilic Arthrobacter to metagenomic data to explain global environmental distribution.

Authors:  Liang Shen; Yongqin Liu; Michelle A Allen; Baiqing Xu; Ninglian Wang; Timothy J Williams; Feng Wang; Yuguang Zhou; Qing Liu; Ricardo Cavicchioli
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 14.650

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.