Literature DB >> 10479384

Competitive foraging in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola.

.   

Abstract

Reproductive skew models have greatly enhanced the study of sociality but are applicable only to societies where the aim of the members of the group is to reproduce. In 'foraging societies', where the aim of the members of the group is to grow, quite different parameters will govern the form that the societies take. We examined factors that influence the structure of foraging groups in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola (Eresidae). In particular, we examined food distribution and consumption within groups, and how this related to predictions derived from two models. One model indicates that colonies in which individuals compete for resources via interference competition are more likely to survive than those in which individuals divide resources using scramble competition. The second model predicts the proportions of hunters, cheaters and scavengers expected in foraging groups. We found that food was not distributed evenly among group members, and that spiders that fed primarily on the head and thorax of the prey during the middle of a feeding event gained the most body mass. Spiders even lost mass if they fed only in the last hour of a foraging event. Large spiders had a competitive advantage (via interference competition) in obtaining preferred positions, and could ingest food faster than small spiders. Distributing food among colony members in this manner could cause large size differences between colony members, as predicted by the models. The implications of competitive foraging for sociality are discussed. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479384     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  13 in total

1.  Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Lauren P Luscuskie; Graham A Montgomery; Sara Geary; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Carl N Keiser
Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 0.559

2.  Foraging under conditions of short-term exploitative competition: the case of stock traders.

Authors:  Serguei Saavedra; R Dean Malmgren; Nicholas Switanek; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Producers and scroungers: feeding-type composition changes with group size in a socially foraging spider.

Authors:  Marlis Dumke; Marie E Herberstein; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Rediet Geremew; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.

Authors:  Colin M Wright; James L L Lichtenstein; Graham A Montgomery; Lauren P Luscuskie; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Benefits of cooperation with genetic kin in a subsocial spider.

Authors:  J M Schneider; T Bilde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evolving nutritional strategies in the presence of competition: a geometric agent-based model.

Authors:  Alistair M Senior; Michael A Charleston; Mathieu Lihoreau; Jerome Buhl; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Benefits of Group Living Include Increased Feeding Efficiency and Lower Mass Loss during Desiccation in the Social and Inbreeding Spider Stegodyphus dumicola.

Authors:  Bram Vanthournout; Michelle Greve; Anne Bruun; Jesper Bechsgaard; Johannes Overgaard; Trine Bilde
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Relatedness facilitates cooperation in the subsocial spider, Stegodyphus tentoriicola.

Authors:  Jasmin Ruch; Lisa Heinrich; Trine Bilde; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Evidence for loss of nepotism in the evolution of permanent sociality.

Authors:  Reut Berger-Tal; Yael Lubin; Virginia Settepani; Marija Majer; Trine Bilde; Cristina Tuni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.