Literature DB >> 34100833

What Are the Functional Outcomes and Pain Scores after Medial Clavicle Fracture Treatment?

Matthew H Lindsey1, Phillip Grisdela1, Laura Lu1, Dafang Zhang2, Brandon Earp2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medial clavicle fractures are uncommon, occurring in older and multiply injured patients. The management of these fractures and the factors that predispose toward poor outcomes are controversial. Furthermore, the functional outcomes of treatment are not well characterized or correlated with fracture patterns. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To determine minimum 1-year functional outcomes using QuickDASH scores and pain scores after medial clavicle fractures and (2) to identify factors associated with these outcome variables.
METHODS: In an institutional review board-approved, retrospective study, we identified adult patients with medial clavicle fractures at two tertiary care referral centers in a single metropolitan area in the United States from January 2010 to March 2019. Our initial query identified 1950 patients with clavicle fractures, from which 74 adult patients with medial clavicle fractures and at least 1 year of follow-up were identified. We attempted to contact these eligible patients by telephone for functional outcomes and pain scores. Twenty-six patients were deceased according to the most recent Social Security Death Index data and public obituaries, three declined participation, and 14 could not be reached, leaving 42% of the total (31 of 74) and 65% (31 of 48) of living patients included in the analysis. Demographic characteristics, fracture characteristics, and clinical and radiographic union as assessed by plain radiography and CT were collected through record review. Twenty-nine patients were treated nonoperatively and two patients underwent open reduction internal fixation. Sixty-eight percent (21 of 31) of the included patients also had radiographic follow-up at least 6 weeks postoperatively; two patients had persistent nonunion at a mean of 5 ± 3 years after injury. Our primary response variable was the QuickDASH score at a minimum of 1 year (median [range] 5 years [2 to 10]). Our secondary response variable was the pain score on a 10-point Likert scale. A bivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with these response variables. The following explanatory variables were studied: age, gender, race, dominant hand injury, employment status, manual labor occupation, primary health insurance, social deprivation, BMI, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, Charlson Comorbidity Index, nonisolated injury, high-energy mechanism of injury, nondisplaced fracture, fracture comminution, superior-inferior fracture displacement, medial-lateral fracture shortening, and surgical treatment of the medial clavicle fracture.
RESULTS: The mean QuickDASH score was 12 ± 15, and the mean pain score was 1 ± 1 at a mean of 5 ± 3 years after injury. The mortality rate of the cohort was 15% (11 of 74) at 1 year, 22% (16 of 74) at 3 years, and 34% (25 of 74) at 5 years after injury. With the numbers available, no factors were associated with the QuickDASH score or pain score, but it is likely we were underpowered to detect potentially important differences.
CONCLUSION: Medial clavicle fractures have favorable functional outcomes and pain relief at minimum 1-year follow-up among those patients who survive the trauma, but a high proportion will die within 3 years of the injury. This likely reflects both the frailty of a predominantly older patient population and the fact that these often are high-energy injuries. The outcome measures in our cohort were not associated with fracture displacement, shortening, or comminution; however, our sample size was underpowered on these points, and so these findings should be considered preliminary. Further studies are needed to determine the subset of patients with this injury who would benefit from surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34100833      PMCID: PMC8509964          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  29 in total

Review 1.  Migration of pins used in operations on the shoulder.

Authors:  F A Lyons; C A Rockwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Surgical treatment of displaced medial clavicle fractures using a small T-shaped plate and tension band sutures.

Authors:  Kyung Cheon Kim; Hyun Dae Shin; Soo Min Cha
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Migration of a Kirschner wire from the clavicle into the intrathoracic trachea.

Authors:  Mitsuo Nakayama; Masatoshi Gika; Hiroki Fukuda; Takeshi Yamahata; Kohei Aoki; Syugo Shiba; Keisuke Eguchi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  The operative outcomes of displaced medial-end clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Verinder S Sidhu; Deborah Hermans; David G Duckworth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation.

Authors:  F L Allman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Multiple fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  N D Clement; S Aitken; A D Duckworth; M M McQueen; C M Court-Brown
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-02

7.  Displaced medial end clavicular fractures treated with an inverted distal clavicle plate contoured through 90 degrees.

Authors:  Andrew Titchener; Abbas See; Lee Van Rensburg; Graham Tytherleigh-Strong
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Displaced Medial-End Clavicle Fractures Treated with Locking Plate Osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Zhongyu Liu; Jinli Zhang; Xu Tian; Shilian Kan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-10-09

9.  Medial injuries of the clavicle: more prevalent than expected? A big data analysis of incidence, age, and gender distribution based on nationwide routine data.

Authors:  Mustafa Sinan Bakir; Jan Unterkofler; Lyubomir Haralambiev; Simon Kim; Roman Carbon; Axel Ekkernkamp; Stefan Schulz-Drost
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Single-center experience in the treatment of extremely medial clavicle fractures with vertical fixation of double-plate: A retrospective study.

Authors:  He Liu; Chuangang Peng; Ziyan Zhang; Baoming Yuan; Guangkai Ren; Junlong Yu; Dankai Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  3 in total

1.  Editorial Comment: Selected Proceedings from the Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons 2020 Annual Meeting.

Authors:  Brian T Barlow; Jennifer Smith
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  The German version of the Nottingham Clavicle Score is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate patients with clavicle and acromioclavicular pathologies.

Authors:  Sebastian Scheidt; Jakob Zapatka; Richard Julius Freytag; Malin Sarah Pohlentz; Matteo Paci; Koroush Kabir; Christof Burger; Davide Cucchi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  CORR Insights®: What Are the Functional Outcomes and Pain Scores after Medial Clavicle Fracture Treatment?

Authors:  Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.