Literature DB >> 36036271

The German version of the Nottingham Clavicle Score is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate patients with clavicle and acromioclavicular pathologies.

Sebastian Scheidt1, Jakob Zapatka1, Richard Julius Freytag1, Malin Sarah Pohlentz2, Matteo Paci3, Koroush Kabir1,4, Christof Burger1, Davide Cucchi5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) is a patient-reported outcome measure developed to evaluate treatment results of clavicle, acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint pathologies. Valid, reliable and user-friendly translations of outcome measure instruments are needed to allow comparisons of international results. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to translate and adapt the NCS into German and evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version.
METHODS: The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the NCS were completed using a 'translation-back translation" method and the final version was administered to 105 German-speaking patients. The psychometric properties of this version (NCS-G) were evaluated in terms of feasibility, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change.
RESULTS: No major differences occurred between the NCS translations into German and back into English, and no content- or linguistic-related difficulties were reported. The Cronbach's alpha for the NCS-G was 0.885, showing optimal internal consistency. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.907 (95% CI 0.844-0.945), with a standard error of measurement of 5.59 points and a minimal detectable change of 15.50 points. The NCS-G showed moderate to strong correlation with all other investigated scales (Spearman correlation coefficient: qDASH: ρ =  - 0.751; OSS: ρ = 0.728; Imatani Score: ρ = 0.646; CMS: ρ = 0.621; VAS: ρ =  - 0.709). Good sensitivity to change was confirmed by an effect size of 1.17 (95% CI 0.89-1.47) and a standardized response mean of 1.23 (95% CI 0.98-1.45).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that NCS-G is reliable, valid, reproducible and well accepted by patients, showing analogous psychometric properties to the original English version. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint; Adaptation; Clavicle; Cross-cultural; German; Nottingham Clavicle Score; Patient-reported; Translation; Validation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36036271     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07129-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  38 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton; James G Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  The Oxford shoulder score revisited.

Authors:  Jill Dawson; Katherine Rogers; Ray Fitzpatrick; Andrew Carr
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Cronbach's alpha.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-22

5.  Outcomes measurements.

Authors:  P C Amadio
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Outcomes research in orthopedics: history, perspectives, concepts, and future.

Authors:  D D Bradham
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  A validation of the Nottingham Clavicle Score: a clavicle, acromioclavicular joint and sternoclavicular joint-specific patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Edmund R Charles; Vinod Kumar; James Blacknall; Kimberley Edwards; John M Geoghegan; Paul A Manning; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  The Specific AC Score (SACS): a new and validated method of assessment of isolated acromioclavicular joint pathology.

Authors:  Shane A Barwood; Jacqui A French; Lyn A Watson; Simon M Balster; Greg A Hoy; Tania Pizzari
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Shoulder injuries from birth to old age: A 1-year prospective study of 3031 shoulder injuries in an urban population.

Authors:  Martine Enger; Stein Arve Skjaker; Knut Melhuus; Lars Nordsletten; Are Hugo Pripp; Stefan Moosmayer; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  High grade acromioclavicular injury: Comparison of arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Arrisna Artha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.