Literature DB >> 34099952

Prosthesis size distribution in Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - Based on more than 1900 Chinese patients.

Fang-Xing Wang1, Hua-Ming Xue1, Tong Ma1, Tao Yang1, Tao Wen1, Yi-Hui Tu1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is difficult to determine the optimal size of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) prosthesis both pre-operatively and intra-operatively. Inappropriate femoral and tibial components are still the leading cause of failure. Several guidelines based on the Western population may not apply to the Chinese patients. We consequently try to investigate distributions of Oxford-UKA prosthesis in Chinese patients in order to provide a good reference for surgeons preoperatively.
METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2019, 1909 patients (2307 knees) with primary anteromedial osteoarthritis accepted Oxford phase III UKA. Statistical analyses were performed on the distributions of the femoral, tibial, and matching of the femoral-tibial prosthesis. The possible factors affecting the sizes of femoral components, including gender, height based on gender were investigated.
RESULTS: 1. The distributions of femoral size components include extra-large (XL) 0, large (L) 1.08%, medium (M) 26.09%, small (S) 59.64%, extra-small (XS) 13.18%; the tibial sizes components were F 0, E 0.69%, D 7.80%, C 19.59%, B 24.79%, A 34.16%, AA 12.96%. 2. The matching of femur-tibia components were L-E 0.52%,L-D 0.52%,M-E 0.17%, M-D 7.28%,M - C 16.60%,M - B 1.95%,M-A 0.13%, M-AA 0.04%, S-C 2.99%, S-B 22.67%, S-A 31.12%, S-AA 2.82%, XS-B 0.17%, XS-A 2.90% and XS-AA 10.10%. The optimal matches between femoral and tibial components were: XL with F; L with E; M with C and D; S with A and B. 3. The patient's gender and height based on gender are necessary considerations for selection of femoral components (P<0.01).
CONCLUSION: In Chinese patients, the size of femoral components is mainly small (S) for women, medium (M) for men. The tibial components of female patients are mainly A and B, whereas C is predominant for male patients. The more commonly used matching forms are S-A and S-B.
© 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distribution of prosthesis; Knee prosthesis; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34099952      PMCID: PMC8165290          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  31 in total

1.  The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  S R Ridgeway; J P McAuley; D J Ammeen; G A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

2.  Reliability of templating in estimating the size of uni-condylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Venay Bothra; Gerard Lemon; Derek Lang; David M Smith; Ahmad M Ali
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ph Hernigou; G Deschamps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The precision and accuracy of templating the size of unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ata G Kasis; R J Pacheco; W Hekal; Munthir J Farhan; David M Smith; Ahmad M Ali
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Posterior femoral condylar offsets of a Chinese population.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Tsung-Yuan Tsai; Bin Yue; Young-Min Kwon; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Marc Mariani; Michael H Bourne; Richard T Jackson; Scott T Jackson; Portia Jones
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl; Otto Robertsson; Lars Lidgren; Lisa Miller; David Davidson; Stephen Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

Authors:  B T Rougraff; D A Heck; A E Gibson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Esa Koskinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Antti Eskelinen; Pekka Pulkkinen; Ville Remes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).

Authors:  Qidong Zhang; Qian Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Zhaohui Liu; Liming Cheng; Debo Yue; Nianfei Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.