Literature DB >> 17453404

Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.

Esa Koskinen1, Pekka Paavolainen, Antti Eskelinen, Pekka Pulkkinen, Ville Remes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice and use of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gone through a nation wide resurgence at the start of the 21st century in Finland. We evaluated the population-based survival of UKA in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) in Finland, and the factors affecting their survival.
METHOD: The Finnish Arthroplasty Register was established in 1980. During the years 1985-2003, 1,928 primary UKAs were recorded in the register; 1,819 of these were performed for primary OA. Of these 1,819 UKAs, we selected for further analysis implants that had been used in more than 100 operations during the study period. The survival rates of UKAs were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Analysis of the whole study period showed that UKAs had a 73% (95% CI: 70-76) survival rate at 10 years, with revision for any reason as the end point. Those patients who received the Oxford menisceal bearing unicondylar (n = 1145) had a survival rate of 81% (95% CI: 72-89) at 10 years. The group that received the Miller-Galante II unicondylar (n = 330) had a 79% survival rate (95% CI: 71-87) at 10 years, whereas the Duracon (n = 196) had a survival rate of 78% (95% CI: 72-84) and the PCA (n = 146) had a survival rate of 53% (95% CI: 45-60) at 10 years. The number of UKA operations in Finland has increased markedly in recent years. At the time of operation, the mean age of the patients was 65 (38-91) years. Younger patients (<or= 65 years of age) were found to have a 1.5-fold (95% CI: 1.1-2.0; p = 0.04) increased risk of revision compared to older patients (< 65 years).
INTERPRETATION: UKA is a viable option for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. However, patients should be made aware of the lower survival of the UKAs compared with total knee arthroplasties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17453404     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610013538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  62 in total

1.  The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gunter Spahn; Gunther O Hofmann; Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Mengxia Li; Henning Neubauer; Hans Michael Klinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Incidence of osteotomies around the knee for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a 22-year population-based study.

Authors:  Tuukka T Niinimäki; Antti Eskelinen; Pasi Ohtonen; Mika Junnila; Juhana Leppilahti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

4.  Overstuffed medial compartment after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Kerens; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Balancing UKA: overstuffing leads to high medial collateral ligament strains.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Bilal F El-Zayat; Ronny De Corte; Lennart Scheys; Yan Chevalier; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Luc Labey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Is unicompartmental arthroplasty an acceptable option for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee?

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Raspugli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Jaakko Järvenpää; Jukka Kettunen; Hannu Miettinen; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparative study of the use of computer assisted navigation system for axial correction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mui-Hong Lim; Andras Tallay; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.