Literature DB >> 34096979

Risk of Subsequent Fractures in Postmenopausal Women After Nontraumatic vs Traumatic Fractures.

Carolyn J Crandall1, Joseph C Larson2, Andrea Z LaCroix3, John A Robbins4, Jean Wactawski-Wende5, Karen C Johnson6, Maryam Sattari7, Katie L Stone8, Julie C Weitlauf9,10, Tanya R Gure11,12, Jane A Cauley13.   

Abstract

Importance: The burden of fractures among postmenopausal women is high. Although nontraumatic fractures are strong risk factors for future fracture, current clinical guidelines do not address traumatic fractures. Objective: To determine how future fracture risk varies according to whether an initial fracture is traumatic or nontraumatic. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a prospective observational study using data from the Women's Health Initiative Study (WHI) (enrollment, September 1994-December 1998; data analysis, September 2020 to March 2021), which enrolled postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years at baseline at 40 US clinical centers. The WHI Clinical Trials and WHI Bone Density Substudy, conducted at 3 of the clinical centers, asked participants to report the mechanism of incident fractures. Of 75 335 participants, information regarding incident fracture and covariates was available for 66 874 participants (88.8%), who comprised the analytic sample of this study. Mean (SD) follow-up was 8.1 (1.6) years. Interventions: None. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident clinical fractures were self-reported at least annually and confirmed using medical records. Participants reported the mechanism of incident fracture as traumatic or nontraumatic.
Results: Among the 66 874 participants in the analytic sample (mean [SD] age, 63.1 [7.0] years and 65.3 [7.2] years among women without and with clinical fracture, respectively), 7142 participants (10.7%) experienced incident fracture during the study follow-up period. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of subsequent fracture after initial fracture was 1.49 (95% CI, 1.38-1.61). Among women whose initial fracture was traumatic, the association between initial fracture and subsequent fracture was significantly increased (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.48). Among women whose initial fracture was nontraumatic, the association between initial fracture and subsequent fracture was also increased (aHR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.37-1.68). Confidence intervals for associations between initial fracture and subsequent fracture were overlapping for traumatic and nontraumatic initial fracture strata. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, among postmenopausal women older than 50 years, fracture was associated with a greater risk of subsequent fracture regardless of whether the fracture was traumatic or nontraumatic. These findings suggest that clinical osteoporosis assessment should include high-trauma as well as low-trauma fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34096979      PMCID: PMC8185628          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   44.409


  16 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Test-retest performance of a mailed version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey among older adults.

Authors:  E M Andresen; N Bowley; B M Rothenberg; R Panzer; P Katz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M T Cuddihy; S E Gabriel; C S Crowson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Susan J Curry; Alex H Krist; Douglas K Owens; Michael J Barry; Aaron B Caughey; Karina W Davidson; Chyke A Doubeni; John W Epling; Alex R Kemper; Martha Kubik; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Maureen G Phipps; Michael Pignone; Michael Silverstein; Melissa A Simon; Chien-Wen Tseng; John B Wong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE.

Authors:  Pauline M Camacho; Steven M Petak; Neil Binkley; Dima L Diab; Leslie S Eldeiry; Azeez Farooki; Steven T Harris; Daniel L Hurley; Jennifer Kelly; E Michael Lewiecki; Rachel Pessah-Pollack; Michael McClung; Sunil J Wimalawansa; Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  R E Patterson; A R Kristal; L F Tinker; R A Carter; M P Bolton; T Agurs-Collins
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evaluation of physical activity measures used in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Kelley Pettee Gabriel; James J McClain; Chong D Lee; Pamela D Swan; Brent A Alvar; Melanie R Mitros; Barbara E Ainsworth
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women.

Authors:  JoAnn E Manson; Philip Greenland; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marcia L Stefanick; Charles P Mouton; Albert Oberman; Michael G Perri; David S Sheps; Mary B Pettinger; David S Siscovick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  Abnormal Trabecular Bone Score, Lower Bone Mineral Density and Lean Mass in Young Women With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Are Prevented by Oestrogen Replacement.

Authors:  Navira Samad; Hanh H Nguyen; Hikaru Hashimura; Julie Pasco; Mark Kotowicz; Boyd J Strauss; Peter R Ebeling; Frances Milat; Amanda J Vincent
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 2.  Estradiol and Estrogen-like Alternative Therapies in Use: The Importance of the Selective and Non-Classical Actions.

Authors:  Szidónia Farkas; Adrienn Szabó; Anita Emőke Hegyi; Bibiána Török; Csilla Lea Fazekas; Dávid Ernszt; Tamás Kovács; Dóra Zelena
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Muscle density is an independent risk factor of second hip fracture: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Lu Yin; Minghui Yang; Yufeng Ge; Yandong Liu; Yongbin Su; Zhe Guo; Dong Yan; Zhengyang Xu; Pengju Huang; Jian Geng; Xingli Liu; Gang Wang; Glen M Blake; Weiming Cao; Bo He; Liang Lyu; Xiaoguang Cheng; Xinbao Wu; Lihong Jiang; Annegreet Vlug; Klaus Engelke
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 12.063

4.  Metabolomics Coupled with Pathway Analysis Provides Insights into Sarco-Osteoporosis Metabolic Alterations and Estrogen Therapeutic Effects in Mice.

Authors:  Ziheng Wei; Fei Ge; Yanting Che; Si Wu; Xin Dong; Dianwen Song
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.