PURPOSE: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is the largest research program ever initiated in the United States with a focus on diet and health. Therefore, it is important to understand and document the measurement characteristics of the key dietary assessment instrument: the WHI food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). METHODS: Data are from 113 women screened for participation in the WHI in 1995. We assessed bias and precision of the FFQ by comparing the intake of 30 nutrients estimated from the FFQ with means from four 24-hour dietary recalls and a 4-day food record. RESULTS: For most nutrients, means estimated by the FFQ were within 10% of the records or recalls. Precision, defined as the correlation between the FFQ and the records and recalls, was similar to other FFQs. Energy adjusted correlation coefficients ranged from 0.2 (vitamin B12) to 0.7 (magnesium) with a mean of 0.5. The correlation for percentage energy from fat (a key measure in WHI) was 0.6. Vitamin supplement use was common. For example, almost half of total vitamin E intake was obtained from supplements. Including supplemental vitamins and minerals increased micronutrient correlation coefficients, which ranged from 0.2 (thiamin) to 0.8 (vitamin E) with a mean of 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: The WHI FFQ produced nutrient estimate, that were similar to those obtained from short-term dietary recall and recording methods. Comparison of WHI FFQ nutrient intake measures to independent and unbiased measures, such as doubly labeled water estimates of energy expenditure, are needed to help address the validity of the FFQ in this population.
PURPOSE: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is the largest research program ever initiated in the United States with a focus on diet and health. Therefore, it is important to understand and document the measurement characteristics of the key dietary assessment instrument: the WHI food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). METHODS: Data are from 113 women screened for participation in the WHI in 1995. We assessed bias and precision of the FFQ by comparing the intake of 30 nutrients estimated from the FFQ with means from four 24-hour dietary recalls and a 4-day food record. RESULTS: For most nutrients, means estimated by the FFQ were within 10% of the records or recalls. Precision, defined as the correlation between the FFQ and the records and recalls, was similar to other FFQs. Energy adjusted correlation coefficients ranged from 0.2 (vitamin B12) to 0.7 (magnesium) with a mean of 0.5. The correlation for percentage energy from fat (a key measure in WHI) was 0.6. Vitamin supplement use was common. For example, almost half of total vitamin E intake was obtained from supplements. Including supplemental vitamins and minerals increased micronutrient correlation coefficients, which ranged from 0.2 (thiamin) to 0.8 (vitamin E) with a mean of 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: The WHI FFQ produced nutrient estimate, that were similar to those obtained from short-term dietary recall and recording methods. Comparison of WHI FFQ nutrient intake measures to independent and unbiased measures, such as doubly labeled water estimates of energy expenditure, are needed to help address the validity of the FFQ in this population.
Authors: Joshua H Gordon; Michael J LaMonte; Jiwei Zhao; Robert J Genco; Thomas R Cimato; Kathleen M Hovey; Matthew A Allison; Charles P Mouton; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Lesley F Tinker; Gloria E Sarto; Barbara V Howard; Ying Huang; Marian L Neuhouser; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Jeannette M Beasley; Karen L Margolis; Charles B Eaton; Lawrence S Phillips; Ross L Prentice Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Brian M Wolpin; Kimmie Ng; Ying Bao; Peter Kraft; Meir J Stampfer; Dominique S Michaud; Jing Ma; Julie E Buring; Howard D Sesso; I-Min Lee; Nader Rifai; Barbara B Cochrane; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rowan T Chlebowski; Walter C Willett; JoAnn E Manson; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Nataŝa Tasevska; Arthur Schatzkin; Julie Mares; Lesley Tinker; Nancy Potischman; Victor Kipnis Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Meryl S Leboff; Rupali Narweker; Andrea LaCroix; Lieling Wu; Rebecca Jackson; Jennifer Lee; Douglas C Bauer; Jane Cauley; Charles Kooperberg; Cora Lewis; Asha M Thomas; Steven Cummings Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jung Ho Gong; Kenneth Lo; Qing Liu; Jie Li; Shuiqing Lai; Aladdin H Shadyab; Chrisa Arcan; Linda Snetselaar; Simin Liu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Betsy C Wertheim; Andrea Z LaCroix; Ross L Prentice; Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley F Tinker; Stephen Kritchevsky; James M Shikany; Charles Eaton; Zhao Chen; Cynthia A Thomson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 5.562