Literature DB >> 29946735

Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Susan J Curry1, Alex H Krist2,3, Douglas K Owens4,5, Michael J Barry6, Aaron B Caughey7, Karina W Davidson8, Chyke A Doubeni9, John W Epling10, Alex R Kemper11, Martha Kubik12, C Seth Landefeld13, Carol M Mangione14, Maureen G Phipps15, Michael Pignone16,17, Michael Silverstein18, Melissa A Simon19, Chien-Wen Tseng20,21, John B Wong22.   

Abstract

Importance: By 2020, approximately 12.3 million individuals in the United States older than 50 years are expected to have osteoporosis. Osteoporotic fractures, particularly hip fractures, are associated with limitations in ambulation, chronic pain and disability, loss of independence, and decreased quality of life, and 21% to 30% of patients who experience a hip fracture die within 1 year. The prevalence of primary osteoporosis (ie, osteoporosis without underlying disease) increases with age and differs by race/ethnicity. With the aging of the US population, the potential preventable burden is likely to increase in future years. Objective: To update the 2011 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for osteoporosis. Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for and treatment of osteoporotic fractures in men and women, as well as risk assessment tools, screening intervals, and efficacy of screening and treatment in subgroups. The screening population was postmenopausal women and older men with no known previous osteoporotic fractures and no known comorbid conditions or medication use associated with secondary osteoporosis. Findings: The USPSTF found convincing evidence that bone measurement tests are accurate for detecting osteoporosis and predicting osteoporotic fractures in women and men. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that clinical risk assessment tools are moderately accurate in identifying risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. The USPSTF found convincing evidence that drug therapies reduce subsequent fracture rates in postmenopausal women. The USPSTF found that the evidence is inadequate to assess the effectiveness of drug therapies in reducing subsequent fracture rates in men without previous fractures. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis with bone measurement testing to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years and older. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis with bone measurement testing to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years at increased risk of osteoporosis, as determined by a formal clinical risk assessment tool. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men. (I statement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29946735     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.7498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  98 in total

1.  The exploration of feature extraction and machine learning for predicting bone density from simple spine X-ray images in a Korean population.

Authors:  Sangwoo Lee; Eun Kyung Choe; Hae Yeon Kang; Ji Won Yoon; Hua Sun Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  What information can the lay public find about osteoporosis treatment? A descriptive study coding the content and quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet.

Authors:  L N Fuzzell; M J Richards; L Fraenkel; S L Stark; M C Politi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Editorial: Secondary Fracture Prevention-What's Your System?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  UNDERSTANDING OSTEOPOROSIS SCREENING PRACTICES IN MEN: A NATIONWIDE PHYSICIAN SURVEY.

Authors:  Palak Choksi; Brittany L Gay; David Reyes-Gastelum; Megan R Haymart; Maria Papaleontiou
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Using Biomechanical Computed Tomography for Patients With a Previous Abdominal CT.

Authors:  Maria Pisu; David L Kopperdahl; Cora E Lewis; Kenneth G Saag; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-03-24       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Effects of Milk and Dairy Products on the Prevention of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures in Europeans and Non-Hispanic Whites from North America: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pilar Matía-Martín; Macarena Torrego-Ellacuría; Angélica Larrad-Sainz; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Federico Cuesta-Triana; Miguel Ángel Rubio-Herrera
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

7.  Serial Bone Density Measurement and Incident Fracture Risk Discrimination in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Joseph Larson; Nicole C Wright; Deepika Laddu; Marcia L Stefanick; Andrew M Kaunitz; Nelson B Watts; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Catherine R Womack; Karen C Johnson; Laura D Carbone; Rebecca D Jackson; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 8.  Quality Measures and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Osteoporosis-an Update.

Authors:  S French; S Choden; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Evaluating a Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Population for Patients at High Risk of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Xuxuan Liu; Aeman Choudhury; Cody Anderson
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2019-11

10.  Elevated fracture risk for adults with neurodevelopmental disabilities.

Authors:  Daniel G Whitney; Michelle S Caird; Karl J Jepsen; Neil S Kamdar; Christina N Marsack-Topolewski; Edward A Hurvitz; Mark D Peterson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.