Literature DB >> 34077244

Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Outcomes of a National Clinical Trial Matching and Navigation Service for Patients With a Blood Cancer.

Maria Sae-Hau1, Kate Disare1, Margo Michaels2, Alissa Gentile1, Leah Szumita1, Katherine Treiman3, Elisa S Weiss1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are numerous barriers to cancer clinical trial participation in the United States. This paper describes the approach and outcomes of The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society's Clinical Trial Support Center (CTSC), whose nurse navigators assist patients with a blood cancer and their oncologists by identifying all appropriate trials based on clinical data and patient preference, facilitating informed and shared decision making, and minimizing enrollment barriers.
METHODS: Data on patients served from October 2017 to October 2019 were analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses to determine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with enrollment. Reasons for nonenrollment were examined.
RESULTS: The CTSC opened 906 patient cases during this time frame. Among all US patients with a closed case (n = 750), the clinical trial enrollment rate was 16.1%. Among those with a known enrollment outcome after a trial search (n = 537), the enrollment rate was 22.5%. Multivariate analysis controlling for variables significant in bivariate analyses (insurance, treatment status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and urban or rural residence) revealed that patients with Medicaid were less likely to enroll than those with private or commercial insurance (adjusted odds ratio, 0.054; CI, 0.003 to 0.899), and patients in treatment or maintenance were less likely to enroll than those relapsed or refractory to most recent therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.312; CI, 0.139 to 0.702). Primary reasons for nonenrollment were preference for standard of care (66.3%) and patient passed away (16.1%).
CONCLUSION: The CTSC is an effective, replicable model for addressing multilevel barriers to clinical trial participation. The findings highlight the need to increase opportunities for trial participation sooner after diagnosis and among patients with Medicaid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34077244      PMCID: PMC8677968          DOI: 10.1200/OP.20.01068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract        ISSN: 2688-1527


  49 in total

1.  A screening tool to enhance clinical trial participation at a community center involved in a radiation oncology disparities program.

Authors:  Julian W Proctor; Elaine Martz; Larry L Schenken; Rebecca Rainville; Ursula Marlowe
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  US Cancer Centers of Excellence Strategies for Increased Inclusion of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Jeanne M Regnante; Nicole A Richie; Lola Fashoyin-Aje; Michelle Vichnin; Marvella Ford; Upal Basu Roy; Kenneth Turner; Laura Lee Hall; Evelyn Gonzalez; Nestor Esnaola; Luther T Clark; Homer C Adams; Olatunji B Alese; Keerthi Gogineni; Lorna McNeill; Daniel Petereit; Ify Sargeant; Julie Dang; Coleman Obasaju; Quita Highsmith; Simon Craddock Lee; Spencer C Hoover; Erin L Williams; Moon S Chen
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials.

Authors:  Carol A Townsley; Rita Selby; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Outcomes of a cancer clinical trial matching service.

Authors:  Ted Gansler; Man Jin; Joseph Bauer; Katie Dahlquist; Larissa Tis; Katherine Sharpe; Robert Comis; Kimberly Naples; James Kepner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Representation of Minorities and Women in Oncology Clinical Trials: Review of the Past 14 Years.

Authors:  Narjust Duma; Jesus Vera Aguilera; Jonas Paludo; Candace L Haddox; Miguel Gonzalez Velez; Yucai Wang; Konstantinos Leventakos; Joleen M Hubbard; Aaron S Mansfield; Ronald S Go; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Physician perspectives on increasing minorities in cancer clinical trials: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Initiative.

Authors:  H A Pinto; W McCaskill-Stevens; P Wolfe; A C Marcus
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Warren B Sateren; Edward L Trimble; Jeffrey Abrams; Otis Brawley; Nancy Breen; Leslie Ford; Mary McCabe; Richard Kaplan; Malcolm Smith; Richard Ungerleider; Michaele C Christian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Kessely Hong; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2019-05-17

9.  Patient and physician attitudes toward breast cancer clinical trials: developing interventions based on understanding barriers.

Authors:  Michelle E Melisko; Fern Hassin; Lauren Metzroth; Dan H Moore; Beth Brown; Kiran Patel; Hope S Rugo; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Statewide cancer clinical trial navigation service.

Authors:  Karen Moffitt; Frank Brogan; Clarence Brown; Michael Kasper; Joseph Rosenblatt; Robert Smallridge; Daniel Sullivan; Jeffrey Kromrey
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Beyond race: Recruitment of diverse participants in clinical genomics research for rare disease.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; Meghan C Halley; Beatriz Anguiano; Liliana Fernandez; Jonathan A Bernstein; Matthew T Wheeler; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.